- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

trimming system includes
by corvid＠lavabit.com June 21, 2009

June 21, 2009

Would anyone have strong objections if I go through and make some patches to remove system includes where I can't see any evidence that any code now in that file still needs that header?

3 3

experimental patch: nowrap
by corvid＠lavabit.com June 20, 2009

June 20, 2009

Currently dillo does not handle the case where certain regions of a line can be wrapped and other regions cannot. A prominent example is the list of browsers at the bottom of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dillo Here is a patch that minimizes memory use (adds one int per textblock) at some cost of recalculating things http://www.dillo.org/test/nowrap.patch When whitespace isn't WHITE_SPACE_NORMAL, Textblock::add* functions still add words to the word list, but postpone wrapping until the entire nowrap/pre chunk has been added or a break has been seen. This is so that we know whether to put it all on a new line. Some possibilities: Putting some kind of spanWidth in each Word, calculating it in addNowrapWords and sticking this nonzero value into the beginning word. We'd have to remember to deal with it if things in the span changed size, or if dillo got on-the-fly display:none someday or whatever. Taking the time to stick the whole chunk into one word when the style is all the same. (Similar difficulties as the above.) I'm not sure whether that would make life more difficult if dillo got bidirectional text someday. Putting the nowrap Words into a Something, so that what is now a Word list would contain Word Word Word Something Word Something Word... That sounds complicated. Let the add* functions put the nowrap Words through wordWrap, and keep track of shifts between normal/nowrap in a line. When a line is completed, set up rewrap to do it over. This would be in an effort to "push down the bubble" of ickiness around add*/addNowrapWords/rewrap, although the resulting new bubble of ickiness that would pop up next to it would perhaps be similar. Small things that might or might not be improvements: make breaks have normal whitespace, and make lines with only one word have normal whitespace (text/plain).

1 0

dillo-2.1.tar.bz2
by jcid＠dillo.org June 18, 2009

June 18, 2009

Hi, Working on: 1.- Solve the OpenSSL license issue and upload rc3. On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 05:24:25PM +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Jorge Arellano Cid<jcid(a)dillo.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:01:12PM +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > > [...] > > ?Devid: please send me the .deb and its directions when done. > DONE! You can find it at https://launchpad.net/~d.filoni/+archive/ppa > . However I found an error checking my package using lintian: > > E: dillo: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl > N: > N: This package appears to be covered by the GNU GPL but depends on the > N: OpenSSL libssl package and does not mention a license exemption or > N: exception for OpenSSL in its copyright file. The GPL (including version > N: 3) is incompatible with some terms of the OpenSSL license, and therefore > N: Debian does not allow GPL-licensed code linked with OpenSSL libraries > N: unless there is a license exception explicitly permitting this. > N: > N: If only the Debian packaging, or some other part of the package not > N: linked with OpenSSL, is covered by the GNU GPL, please add a lintian > N: override for this tag. Lintian currently has no good way of > N: distinguishing between that case and problematic packages. > N: > N: Severity: serious, Certainty: wild-guess > > Can you please fix it? AFAIS, the only program that links to OpenSSL is the https dpi. i.e. The ssl-enabled dillo binary doesn't link to it. https.filter.dpi links to it. IANAL, but it looks like giving permission for this dpi is enough, and it's already done in its sources (dpi/https.c): * [...] * As a special exception permission is granted to link the code of * the https dillo plugin with the OpenSSL project's "OpenSSL" * library, and distribute the linked executables, without including * the source code for OpenSSL in the source distribution. You must * obey the GNU General Public License, version 3, in all respects * for all of the code used other than "OpenSSL". * */ Please let me know if this is _really_ enough or if some extra legal formula must be added somewhere else. TIA. -- Cheers Jorge.-

2 2

dillo-2.1.tar.bz2
by jcid＠dillo.org June 18, 2009

June 18, 2009

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 05:24:25PM +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Jorge Arellano Cid<jcid(a)dillo.org> wrote: > > [...] > > ?BTW, the rc2 version of dillo-2.1 (hopefully final) was > > just uploaded to http://www.dillo.org/download/ so packagers > > can make the respective files. > > > > ?The idea is to make the announcement tomorrow in the morning. > > > > ?Devid: please send me the .deb and its directions when done. > DONE! You can find it at https://launchpad.net/~d.filoni/+archive/ppa > . However I found an error checking my package using lintian: > > E: dillo: possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl > N: > N: This package appears to be covered by the GNU GPL but depends on the > N: OpenSSL libssl package and does not mention a license exemption or > N: exception for OpenSSL in its copyright file. The GPL (including version > N: 3) is incompatible with some terms of the OpenSSL license, and therefore > N: Debian does not allow GPL-licensed code linked with OpenSSL libraries > N: unless there is a license exception explicitly permitting this. > N: > N: If only the Debian packaging, or some other part of the package not > N: linked with OpenSSL, is covered by the GNU GPL, please add a lintian > N: override for this tag. Lintian currently has no good way of > N: distinguishing between that case and problematic packages. > N: > N: Severity: serious, Certainty: wild-guess > > Can you please fix it? OK guys, don't hurry! ---------------------------------------------------- Let's make the announcement early this Saturday 20. ---------------------------------------------------- That way we have until tomorrow to sort out the packaging problem and this license issue. I'd proceed in this order: 1.- Solve the OpenSSL license issue and upload rc3. 2.- To enable-ssl or not enable-ssl (define what to do). 3.- Get to the less painful package-system for the user given the current situation. (most probably distribution repositories) 4.- Future planning: how to get dillo2 into distros to enlarge its user base. FLTK2 vs FLTK-1.3 * I have plenty of info here, but will hold on until the previous points are done. Thanks for all the help. -- Cheers Jorge.-

1 0

dillo-2.1.tar.bz2
by jcid＠dillo.org June 17, 2009

June 17, 2009

On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 03:33:56AM +0000, corvid wrote: > I just remembered that the README needs to be updated > since it talks about all of the new things that 2.0 brought. I just updated the repo. Please give it a review and fix the grammar where necessary. The patch for working keyboard under numlock was also committed (overlooked by me). Those having trouble with rc1, please confirm the repo (rc2) works OK now. When I get both OKs, I'll upload a new tarball for making the respective packages. If there's anything else pending, speak now! -- Cheers Jorge.-

1 0

keyboard shortcuts non-functioning under KDE 3.5.10
by paul＠claws-mail.org June 17, 2009

June 17, 2009

Hi, I've got recent code from mercurial, June 1st. No keyboard shortcuts are working for me using KDE 3.5.10. I was speaking to Johannes Hofmann about this problem, he asked me what my locale was (it's en-GB.UTF-8) and also asked me to report the problem here. Do you need more information from me? Whilst I'm here I would like to say thanks to Johannes for sorting out the --xid option, Claws Mail now has a dillo plugin again! with regards Paul -- "Thanks to his green candle, the 'Pataphysician can lighten our darkness."

6 10

dillo-2.1.tar.bz2
by jcid＠dillo.org June 16, 2009

June 16, 2009

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 09:34:43PM +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote: > I'm working on the Debian/Ubuntu package. I'm the Debian developer of > dillo so I know what I do, however I will not upload this in Debian > until fltk doesn't fix the license (it should be December 2001 in > order to get uploaded in Debian). I will send you the package > tomorrow. Excellent. -- Cheers Jorge.-

2 1

Limiting number connections made to server
by dennisn＠dennisn.dyndns.org June 16, 2009

June 16, 2009

Currently, I don't think dillo places any kind of regulation on the number of connections it tries to make with an http server, and this causes bad things to happen with some -- ie. if it tries to open a page with hundreds of thumbnails, it can crash some http servers. Is there a way to limit the number of connections made?

3 3

dillo-2.1.tar.bz2
by jcid＠dillo.org June 16, 2009

June 16, 2009

Hi there, We're approaching quickly to the release of dillo-2.1 ! :) The idea is to make the official announcement this Thursday 18 (June) I've uploaded the source tarball: http://www.dillo.org/download/ We need the main .deb and .rpm before Thursday (e.g. Ubuntu & Debian current, same for the most used Fedora). Would you mind Andreas, Kelson? Any comments, confirmation of OK-ness, tests or last minute touches, this is the moment. TIA. -- Cheers Jorge.-

1 0

release candidate 1
by jcid＠dillo.org June 15, 2009

June 15, 2009

Johannes, Corvid, I'll be out of town this weekend, please attend any problem on the repo. as it's rc1. The idea is to make a release next week. On the pending things that you may like to advance: - write the dillo-2.1 about:splash page - check making packages - polish FAQ and help text -- Cheers Jorge.-

2 2