Jorge wrote:
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 11:06:33PM +0000, corvid wrote:
> > BTW, is there a reason why MSG_HTTP doesn't have an "if (prefs.show_msg)"?
>
> Not much of a reason.
> IIRC sometime ago I regarded those as "more important", or at least
> they should be visible before searching bugs from the parser and up.
>
> > And is there a reason why only MSG gets a fflush?
>
> Most probably in a debugging session, important messages were
> beong buffered and so the flush.
>
> I'd say yes, let's have the fflush and prefs.show_msg act on all of them.
> Patch is welcomed! :)
I'm sending this to the list in case I'm doing something clumsy
or dangerous. It's working for me, anyway.
