- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

[Dillo-dev]dillo-0.8.2
by Jorge Arellano Cid July 7, 2004

July 7, 2004

Hi guys, I just uploaded the new dillo-0.8.2 to our site. It will be announced just after Kelson and Phil can upgrade the Dillo packages they make, and after Sebastian and I finish setting a much requested donations link. Thanks to all of you that have asked for a way to support the Dillo project. More about this later... Please download the new tarball and don't hesitate to write if you find a glitch. It may be still on time to fix (before the announcement). Best Jorge.-

3 4

[Dillo-dev]Life goes fast...
by Jorge Arellano Cid July 7, 2004

July 7, 2004

Hi there, The official 0.8.2 announcement is still pending, but the CVS already started to move! --I hope this to be a good sign. Cheers Jorge.- PS: 0.8.2 will be released as is, not with the latest patch(es).

1 0

Re: [Dillo-dev]dillo-0.8.2
by Jorge Arellano Cid July 6, 2004

July 6, 2004

On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, robert w hall wrote: > In article <Pine.LNX.4.60.0407061545350.1610(a)infinity.cl>, Jorge > Arellano Cid <jcid(a)dillo.org> writes >> >> Hi guys, >> >> I just uploaded the new dillo-0.8.2 to our site. > ... > > any changes from rc2? Good question... No, just stuff like the text switch from "0.8.2-rc2" to "0.8.2". Cheers Jorge.-

1 0

[Dillo-dev]Download with external utility?
by Todd Slater July 1, 2004

July 1, 2004

In one of the 0.7 releases I had a patch that allowed me to right-click a link and choose to download with an external utility as specified in ~/.dillo/dillorc. It seems that the last time I tried it on a newer (0.8) release it did not "take" the patch. I can, however, still use the open in external browser option, which was part of the same patch. Should I still be able to apply the download patch to the newest versions rather easily, and if so how? Thanks, Todd -- Name that tune #10: Now a very great man once said that some people will rob you with a fountain pen; it didn't take too long to find out just what he was talking about.

1 0

Re: [Dillo-dev]Hi, i am newer to this list.
by Hermit July 1, 2004

July 1, 2004

Hi, Jorge Sure, i wish i can collaborate with your guys, but how can i join this team? are there any task list? or even you can assign some tasks to me ? BGs/Hermit Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 13:05:07 -0400 (CLT) From: Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)dillo.org> To: Dillo mailing list <dillo-dev(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de> Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev]Hi, i am newer to this list. Hi, > Hi, All > i am newer to this list. now i try to port dillo > to a embedded device. there are few memory and storage > in this kind of device. > dillo is based on gtk+, it is impossible to port > gtk to embedded device because of its size. We know that, and GTK2 is even bigger. > now i try to make dillo to base on microwin+fltk. > i know that there are plan to make dillo base on fltk. > maybe your guys can give me some suggestion about how > to port dillo to base on fltk? Do you want to do it alone? Why not collaborate with us? Cheers Jorge.- _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? 100兆邮箱够不够用？雅虎电邮自助扩容！ http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/100m/*http://cn.promo.yahoo.com/minisite…

2 1

[Dillo-dev]dillo-0.8.2-rc2.tar.bz2 (rc2)
by Jorge Arellano Cid July 1, 2004

July 1, 2004

Hi guys, The first release candidate got only one problem report (on headers), but I couldn't help adding a couple of tiny enhancements. So this is it: + * Set some initial socket-buffering for dpis (in dpid). + * Made the rendered area keep its focus after a form submition. + * Fixed some include files in src/IO/. The socket-buffering helps with 2.6.x kernels (probably a bug in the kernel: the "first" data transfer in the sockets usually is slow, from then and on, it goes as fast as with 2.4.x, but if you don't use the socket for a long time it gives you another slow start). The second fix is just a UI improvement. The third is a cleanup. Please test it from: http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-0.8.2-rc2.tar.bz2 Cheers Jorge.-

1 0

[Dillo-dev]Anything new worth trying out?
by Jeremy Henty June 26, 2004

June 26, 2004

Hi, I've been running a dillo I checked out of CVS on June 6. I was wondering if there was any reason to update. If you have any new features you'd like road-tested I'd be glad to give them a spin. Or should I wait for things to stabilise? Cheers, Jeremy Henty

1 1

[Dillo-dev]dillo-0.8.2-rc1.tar.bz2
by Jorge Arellano Cid June 25, 2004

June 25, 2004

Hi there! I just uploaded the dillo-0.8.2-rc1 (release candidate 1) to our site: http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-0.8.2-rc1.tar.bz2 It's basically what we've been testing in the CVS, so it should be stable. What needs platform testing is the compilation process. This tarball was packaged with the newest auto* tools, so please report back how it goes. If no glitches are found, it'll become our dillo-0.8.2. Cheers Jorge.-

2 1

[Dillo-dev]Hi, i am newer to this list.
by �ffffc4�ffffac�ffffc8�ffffbb �ffffcd�fffff5 June 25, 2004

June 25, 2004

Hi, All i am newer to this list. now i try to port dillo to a embedded device. there are few memory and storage in this kind of device. dillo is based on gtk+, it is impossible to port gtk to embedded device because of its size. now i try to make dillo to base on microwin+fltk. i know that there are plan to make dillo base on fltk. maybe your guys can give me some suggestion about how to port dillo to base on fltk? Thank you very much. BGs/Hermit _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? 嫌邮箱太小？雅虎电邮自助扩容！ http://cn.rd.yahoo.com/mail_cn/tag/10m/*http://cn.mail.yahoo.com/event/10m.…

2 1

[Dillo-dev]BUG#569
by Jorge Arellano Cid June 21, 2004

June 21, 2004

Hi there, What do you guys think of this? 569 Impact: feature fault At: run time Type: misbehaviour Comments: In Dillo, BACK button sends me to other previous html file, not to the previous position in the same file. It is a problem. I tested this BACK BUTTON function in Mozilla and IE. They worked. Please solve this glitch. I really need this function. HTReproduce: In a long html file, click a tag that sends you to the another part in the same html file. Then click BACK BUTTON in the menu bar. You would be in the previous other html file, not in the previous position in the same file. It is a fault behavior. WorkedBy: polsci* hitel* net Submitter: polsci* hitel* net Since the beginning, Dillo's behaviour is as described above. We have received almost no complaints, so it doesn't seem that bad in practice. Would it be worth to change it? Cheers Jorge.-

3 2