- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Google captcha and cached images at VDR Forum registration
by miro.rovis＠croatiafidelis.hr 29 Aug '15

29 Aug '15

I'm a little too tired and really sleepy, but I mention that I hope the Dillo developers will be able to tell me more on the issues that I thoroughly investigated, and posted a lot of captures and screencasts to document it. Please see, discarding what it unnecessary, the forum topic: Why, oh why the Schmoog captcha? https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1027382.html (esp. the post just posted an hour ago or so) and find it documented at: http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr/foss/cap/cap-150824-Schm-capt/ I did my best. Regards! Good night! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

1 0

Dillo-dev Digest, Vol 19, Issue 11 - UI font size
by plmalternate＠gmail.com 29 Aug '15

29 Aug '15

> From: Jeremy Henty <onepoint at starurchin.org> > Plmalternate Plmalternate wrote: > >> If I could figure out how to change the UI font size so it was big >> enough for me to see, it would be perfect. > > I do this by setting "font_factor=1.4" in dillorc (it is under > "RENDERING SECTION"). > > Regards, > > Jeremy Henty Thank you, sir. I tried that wth 1.4, 1.5, and 5.0, rebooting each time. Makes no difference I can see on either a 32 bit Ubuntu 14.04 with plain Openbox or a 64 bit PCLOS with LXDE. I suspected I should put something in ~/.fltk/fltk.org/fltk.prefs but when I searched on that filename the only things I found touching on the subject did so simply to say that was wrong. Just to be clear: I'm talking about the font size of the text buttons/menus: 1st bar: "File" & whatever is in the url field like "example.com" 2nd bar left: "Back", "Forw", "Home", "Reload", "Save", "Stop", "Book", and "Tools". 2nd bar right: "Images x of y" & "Page z kb" For some of those there is a corresponding icon, the size of which is SLIGHTLY adjustable through Tools, Panel Size, but text size doesn't change as far as I can see. I could do without the icons, personally, but that's just me.

1 0

UI font size
by plmalternate＠gmail.com 28 Aug '15

28 Aug '15

Thanks for such a fast and small browser. If I could figure out how to change the UI font size so it was big enough for me to see, it would be perfect. Point me toward a link maybe? If this is doable with either the dillorc or the style.css, including a directory with more than just one example of each in the installation, or alternately, on the website, might spare y'all getting emails like this. Also, you might consider one of the ad driven free forum sites, for mutual user support. Thanks for reading. -- I'm on the waiting list for an email account at protonmail.com where I'll be philip.mundhenk at protonmail.com or maybe philip.mundhenk at protonmail.ch until the DIME project gets off the ground. Because the Bill of Rights needs to be more than "a literary fiction".

3 2

News about TLS support?
by arrowscript＠mail.com 26 Aug '15

26 Aug '15

Hi, any news about TLS support? I'm running Dillo in OpenBSD -current and TLS can't be used: ** ERROR **: dpi.c: can't start dpi daemon Yes, I checked dpi daemon and privileges. I compiled dillo in linux using the flag to enable TLS support, and even there I can't use TLS. Sincerely, Dillo is the best software for www browsing in my opinion, but I can't use them without TLS support [and Vi bindings]. Regards.

1 0

javascript
by brucembeach＠gmail.com 26 Aug '15

26 Aug '15

Hello everybody I completely happy with dillo just the way it is. I consider it insane to go on the web with javascript enabled and apart from gmail I don't normally have cookies enabled. (how can I differentiate the two users? i.e I have dillo of user 1 on the the screen and a dillo of user 2 also on the screen but the 2 dillo's are identical in appearance). Anyway all of a sudden after using dillo for a year or so I find there is a website that I absolutely must get on but it requires javascript. Well okay I search the web to try to find something, anything that has javascript (I've been searching for day and night for about a week now) and find that there are two things 1) Massive huge bloatware 2) dillo Most things don't build, or don't have any kind of a build system or are for x86 (I'm on arm) so I figure I have to bite the bullet and build firefox. I've been rolling my own system for about 20 years so so I know whats involved but after two config failures and it failing on the gigantic final link after an 8 hour build, I come to the conclusion that lifes not worth it. I don't want that piece of junk on my computer anyway. Links2 at one time had javascript but they abandoned it and elinks has javascript as long as you have seamonkey installed (tarball>190Mbytes) Anybody got any ideas? I did find one thing. "duktape" (http://duktape.org/)which seems to be an exceptionlly fine piece of code which is an embeddable Ecmascript E5/E5.1 engine with a focus on portability and compact footprint. All the examples compiled out of the box and linking it to dillo (duktape.c duktape.h) took a few minutes to change the makefile. The size's of the files are dillo 558,480 dillo 767,456 with ducttape I don't know enough to be able to do anything with it (I work with hardware) but thought someone might be interested as a route to get javascript on dillo. Bruce

3 3

Weirdly scaled images (again)
by fusionfile＠gmail.com 17 Aug '15

17 Aug '15

The Dillo user v4hn recently sent a message to this list regarding incorrect image scaling. She or he expresses exactly what I have on my mind: http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2015-July/010596.html I use Dillo 3.0.4 from the Debian stable repositories and I experience the ugly image scaling on many sites, for instance on the two largest news (paper) sites here in Sweden: http://www.dn.se http://www.svd.se I can imagine that most people trying out Dillo will find the stretched-out images very off-putting. Changing the aspect ratio of an image is something you almost never want do do, and changing the aspect ratio of a photo is a big no-no. What's your view on this? Do you use Dillo with CSS disabled? Actually, I think it would be better if image scaling was not implemented at all, rather than broken like this. I'm not familiar with the Dillo code base but I'm a programmer proficient with C and I know some C++, so if I (with some hints) can help I would be more than glad to. Regards, August

2 2

weirdly scaled images
by me＠v4hn.de 16 Aug '15

16 Aug '15

Hey everyone, thanks for the great project. :-) It is awesome to have a graphical browser at ones hand that starts up in less than a second and still supports most of the stuff I need. Now, for quite some time I've been using dillo to read news on http://www.heise.de and it has always annoyed me that some of the images on the main page are weirdly scaled. Because these images are of size 160x90 but are scaled to what feels like 98% of the window's width, they are barely recognizable and distracting. Now with the new release out which still shows this behaviour, I thought I'd ask whether someone's got an idea what the problem might be in this case. Because I'm not at all familiar with the dillo source code and/or the resp. web standards I didn't dare to debug this myself up to now. Would be absolutely awesome if someone could have a look at it, v4hn

4 5

Dillo CPU-hog lock on slashdot
by jcid＠dillo.org 31 Jul '15

31 Jul '15

Hi there, Trying to read about this laptop on slashdot dillo locks with 100% CPU and increasing memory footprint. :-P [1] http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/15/01/20/1655242/librem-a-laptop-custom-… -- Cheers Jorge.-

2 2

different profiles for different sites
by dillo-dev＠toykeeper.net 30 Jul '15

30 Jul '15

Hi, I just wanted to share a simple idea I've found useful. Basically, I have two hotkeys to run dillo with different profiles using a trivial wrapper script: #!/bin/sh FLAVOR=$1 ; shift cd $HOME/.dillo cp dillorc.$FLAVOR dillorc dillo "$@" This way, I can have different user-agents per profile, to allow me to get different behaviors. If I want to use google images or get search results on the first page, I ask Dillo to pretend it's Lynx: http_user_agent="Lynx/2.8.8dev.3 libwww-FM/2.14 SSL-MM/1.4.1" Or if I want to do google searches like "5 meters in feet" or "local weather" or "pizza near me", I ask Dillo to pretend it's an old version of Firefox: http_user_agent="Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/20091201 Firefox/3.5.6" Many sites are picky about the user-agent and won't work right with my usual config, but this way I can get them all to function as desired. :) -- Selene

1 0

[DNG] Will there be a MirDevuan "WTF"?
by miro.rovis＠croatiafidelis.hr 23 Jul '15

23 Jul '15

--- I sent this message three hours ago, but didn't include the list address. Sorry! --- On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:49:34PM -0700, James Powell wrote: ( shouldn't it be like below?, by the netiqette --see KalolaZ just arrived letter in the Multi-seat thread-- ? ) > > Since you would still like it around, in opportunistic or in some other > > way that I should call it, I think a question is due. > > Can you tell to the public what is the purpose of the > > user-not-asked-about, in fact mostly user-never-even-knowing-about-it > > encrypted ssh channel that dbus sets up, along with all the > > non-GNU-compatible remote procedure calls (which are there for what > > purpose?) that dbus implements? > > > > Is that for FOSS stands for? > > > First off cool your jets, and trying call me out on knowing the > internals of an IPC in Userspace I didn't develop is very childish. > Why not? If you're promoting it, or persuading Devuan into the acceptance of it? Anyway, can anyone answer that question? > I honestly don't care if D-Bus what it does other than be a > communication and messaging relay between applications and processes, > as long as it does what it does, and doesn't infringe on anything > else. > > D-Bus is used and is a requirement for some services and software. > You're unfortunately not going to have your cake and coffee with > getting rid of D-Bus. Well then, keep it for those cases, don't put it in all the Devuan boxen by default. Will be fine! > Yes, it's not the greatest design, but it is > friendly at least to the whole UNIX spectrum. > "friendly"... No comment. > Devuan's main purpose is getting rid of systemd as a hard dependency > and allowing user choice in init software, not ripping apart every > project to cater to ever niche and fundamentalist out there preaching > what they feel is FOSS, and also to not start a witch hunt on software > projects. What fundamentalists? The Gentoo folks? Thorsten mirabilos Glaser with his MirDebian "WTF" project, a fundamentalist? Me, a fundamentalist? What do you mean? My desire to, after have achived it for me (but only in Gentoo), some freedom and some security, to teach, if we get a true-foss Devuan that can get its MirDevuan "WTF" fork for itself, to teach newbies to build their system hardened-against-intrusion and surveillance-defeating, that desire of mine a fundamentalist desire? --- The rest cut out because somewhat made disorderly and illegible by probably hotmail defaults (that the immediate sender who I'm replying to apparently uses) or for some other reason. --- Regards! -- Miroslav Rovis Zagreb, Croatia http://www.CroatiaFidelis.hr

1 0