- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

[patch] use delete[] where necessary
by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de July 3, 2008

July 3, 2008

Hi, attached patch uses delete[] for deleting arrays as required by C++. Cheers, Johannes

2 3

Re: patch: rm unused dw configure.in options]
by corvid＠lavabit.com July 3, 2008

July 3, 2008

Jorge accidentally applied my dw2 configure.in change (sent off-list) to dillo2 instead, so let's put the libjpeg stuff back in case anyone needs it:

2 1

[patch] fix findtext for single char searches
by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de July 2, 2008

July 2, 2008

Hi, attached patch fixes a segfault when searching for single characters. Cheers, Johannes

1 0

what's next
by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de June 30, 2008

June 30, 2008

Hi, for me dillo-fltk is pretty stable, fast, and generally a joy to use. I still see the following issues: * In rare cases the screen contents is not properly redrawn due to the redraw optimization. I'm looking for a way to reproduce it. Anyone else seeing this? * The cursor is not always updated properly when over a link. This happens while page is rendered and also when drag-scrolling with the middle mouse button. * The bus error I had posted about is still there and I have seen it once as a segafault with similar stack trace on a Linux box. I still don't have a way to reproduce it though. Any other problems or missing features? Jorge, what do you think about officially releasing what we have in the near future? Or do you prefer to wait for the big stuff (like CSS)? Cheers, Johannes

2 1

Should --enable-ansi be removed?
by corvid＠lavabit.com June 30, 2008

June 30, 2008

I tried enabling it out of curiosity, and I see that the code doesn't come close to compiling with it. Since it complains a lot about the various MSG(...) macros (warning: anonymous variadic macros were introduced in C99), I'm guessing that the answer will be yes.

3 3

[patch] use prefs.vw_fontname
by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de June 27, 2008

June 27, 2008

Hi, attached patch uses prefs.vw_fontname instead of hardcoded "Bitstream Charter" in web.cc. Thereby it avoids opening "Bitstream Charter" if it is not selected in dillorc. This saves about 500k in initial startup size with --disable-xft It hardly saves anything in the xft case. I don't know why. I would have expected it the other way round.... Cheers, Johannes

2 2

Memory usage
by jcid＠dillo.org June 26, 2008

June 26, 2008

Hi there, I've been reviewing memory usage these days, and found some weird numbers that I'd like to understand. Taking the huge mysql page (13MB), I made the following memory measures (with ps). Load a bare dillo, load the simple directory where the huge page is located, then the huge page, then back, then forward, back, forward and back. I did this for dillo2.19Jun, dillo2.21Jun, dillo-fltk (with zone allocators) and dillo1. All in GNU/Linux with image_off. Here are the numbers: ----------- Memory test ----------- %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND 0.1 9672 4144 pts/10 S+ 09:37 0:00 ./dillo-fltk.19Jun bare 0.2 10376 4756 pts/10 S+ 09:37 0:00 ./dillo-fltk.19Jun dir list 6.9 176176 144776 pts/10 S+ 09:37 0:02 ./dillo-fltk.19Jun huge page 5.4 123556 113216 pts/10 S+ 09:37 0:02 ./dillo-fltk.19Jun back 7.0 176176 146240 pts/10 S+ 09:37 0:05 ./dillo-fltk.19Jun forward 5.6 127020 117720 pts/10 S+ 09:37 0:05 ./dillo-fltk.19Jun back 7.0 176172 146240 pts/10 S+ 09:37 0:07 ./dillo-fltk.19Jun forward 5.6 127016 117716 pts/10 S+ 09:37 0:08 ./dillo-fltk.19Jun back %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND 0.1 9672 4140 pts/10 S+ 09:26 0:00 ./dillo-fltk.21Jun bare 0.2 10376 4760 pts/10 S+ 09:26 0:00 ./dillo-fltk.21Jun dir list 5.9 147904 123988 pts/10 S+ 09:31 0:02 ./dillo-fltk.21Jun huge page 4.9 111668 101944 pts/10 S+ 09:31 0:02 ./dillo-fltk.21Jun back 6.0 147780 124792 pts/10 S+ 09:31 0:05 ./dillo-fltk.21Jun forward 5.0 115008 105780 pts/10 S+ 09:31 0:05 ./dillo-fltk.21Jun back 6.0 147780 124856 pts/10 S+ 09:31 0:07 ./dillo-fltk.21Jun forward 5.1 115008 105844 pts/10 S+ 09:31 0:07 ./dillo-fltk.21Jun back %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND 0.1 9676 4084 pts/10 S+ 11:16 0:00 ./dillo-fltk bare 0.2 10464 4768 pts/10 S+ 11:17 0:00 ./dillo-fltk dir list 5.4 136960 112920 pts/10 S+ 11:17 0:04 ./dillo-fltk huge page 4.3 100724 90864 pts/10 S+ 11:17 0:04 ./dillo-fltk back 5.4 136952 113756 pts/10 S+ 11:17 0:09 ./dillo-fltk forward 4.5 104180 94744 pts/10 S+ 11:17 0:09 ./dillo-fltk back 5.4 136888 113776 pts/10 S+ 11:17 0:13 ./dillo-fltk forward 4.5 104116 94764 pts/10 S+ 11:17 0:14 ./dillo-fltk back %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND 0.1 8408 3524 pts/10 S+ 10:59 0:00 ./dillo1 bare 0.1 24788 3564 pts/10 S+ 11:01 0:00 ./dillo1 dir list 8.7 226996 182220 pts/10 S+ 11:01 0:07 ./dillo1 huge page 6.8 165880 141792 pts/10 S+ 11:01 0:09 ./dillo1 back 8.8 226952 184176 pts/10 S+ 11:01 0:17 ./dillo1 forward 6.9 166264 144024 pts/10 S+ 11:01 0:18 ./dillo1 back 8.8 226968 184216 pts/10 S+ 11:01 0:26 ./dillo1 forward 6.9 166264 144060 pts/10 S+ 11:01 0:27 ./dillo1 back Besides showing clearly a sane memory usage reduction pattern, there's a strange fact I don't understand. Once back from the huge page, I'd expect memory usage to drop to what it was before plus the 13MB of cached data, plus some KB of overhead, BUT the RSS keeps near 90MB. This happens with dillo1 too. My thoughts: * If this memory is not freed, it'd be great to find the huge leak. * If it's freed but not returned to the OS., dillo would consume as much memory as the biggest page it has loaded. Clearly not a desirable situation. * It may be that the O.S. knows it can claim back this memory when necessary but prefers to keep it assigned to the same process until it finds better use for it. ------------------------------------------- Huge page with different memory allocators: ------------------------------------------- %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND 5.4 134912 113740 pts/17 S+ 18:56 0:02 ./dillo-fltk step: 2x 5.4 134916 113752 pts/17 S+ 18:57 0:02 ./dillo-fltk step: 2x 5.4 134828 113660 pts/17 S+ 18:58 0:02 ./dillo-fltk step: 2x 5.0 114940 105432 pts/17 S+ 18:53 0:02 ./dillo-fltk step: 1 5.0 111976 105488 pts/17 S+ 18:54 0:03 ./dillo-fltk step: 1 5.0 114872 105416 pts/17 S+ 18:54 0:02 ./dillo-fltk step: 1 5.1 117796 106436 pts/17 S+ 18:59 0:02 ./dillo-fltk step: cst 5.1 117568 106404 pts/17 S+ 19:00 0:02 ./dillo-fltk step: cst 5.1 117820 106460 pts/17 S+ 19:00 0:02 ./dillo-fltk step: cst This data comes from a memory usage reduction by tunning the simpleVector memory allocator. The first is the current one, which allocates in chunks of 2*numAlloc, the second allocates one by one and the third is a custom one I made. The 1-allocator is the best memory usage reducer but it's slower (roughly 20%). The cst-allocator reduces a bit less but is almost as fast as the 2x-allocator (2% slower or so). Memory reduction: VSZ RSS ----------------------------- 1-allocator 15% 7.3% cst-allocator 13% 6.5% ----------------------------- Well, compared with the 1000% "leak" above... :-) -- Cheers Jorge.-

2 5

[patch] Region is no Shape
by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de June 23, 2008

June 23, 2008

Hi, attached patch cleans up Region. It no longer derives from Shape. Region has grown pretty specialize for handling redraws. Also it was never used as Shape object anyway. Cheers, Johannes

2 1

form.cc: more refactoring
by onepoint＠starurchin.org June 23, 2008

June 23, 2008

A set of small patches that clean up form.cc , mostly to do with DilloHtmlSelect . * refactor by creating new functions: - a_Html_parse_stash() - DilloHtmlSelect::ensureSelection() - DilloHtmlSelect::addOptionsTo() - DilloHtmlSelect::appendValuesTo() - DilloHtmlSelect::getCurrentOption() (cf. other getCurrent* methods) * make DilloHtmlSelect::options private * rename DilloHtmlInput::getInputValues() to appendValuesTo() (the new name is more mnemonic and consistent with the DilloHtmlSelect method above) Regards, Jeremy Henty

2 5

back to that SELECT segfault
by corvid＠lavabit.com June 23, 2008

June 23, 2008

In SELECT, if standard_widget_colors is set, color and backgroundColor are set to NULL. This tells FltkResource::setWidgetStyle() to leave the colors on the widget alone. If an inline element inside a SELECT calls style->color->getColor() or style->backgroundColor->getColor(), we get that crash. This currently means FONT and IMG. OBJECT and A would as well if that a_Color_vc code were uncommented. options: - four IN_SELECT tests. - letting Html_stack_cleanup_at_open() be called for inline elements in order to close the SELECT or something if IN_SELECT and the new tag isn't OPTION or OPTGROUP. - generating our own standard widget colors to put into color and backgroundColor. I don't like the first one because someone innocently adding a getColor somewhere in the future will never know about this danger. (a good example would be adding the a_Color_vc to open_frame())

3 5