August 2011 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: Debian Packages of 2.2.1
by jcid＠dillo.org 03 Aug '11

03 Aug '11

Hi Axel, On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 12:38:28PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi Klaumi, hi Jorge, > > Klaumi Klingsporn schrieb am Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 03:32:57PM +0200: > > only to let you know: I built some Debian packages of the stable > > release 2.2.1 today which can be found at: > > Looks as it the binary package is statically linked against FLTK 2 > which is not part of the source package nor in the build-dependencies, > i.e. it must be installed manually to be able to build the package. > Ugly, but understable. > > FLTK 2 never was in Debian mainly because first it had a non-free > license, and when that was fixed it became deprecated. Yes, we worked on the license issue with the FLTK team... > Being an > alpha-version was way less the problem. Such things can go into Debian > Experimental and often also do. Sure, and policy was the main obstacle for all distros. (absolutely understandable to my taste). > > [...] > > After doing that I saw, that Axel Beckert just built packages of > > dillo3 for experimental. > > Yep, did that at DebCamp between the timestamp of the 2.2.1 ChangeLog > (17.7., see http://hg.dillo.org/dillo/file/tip/ChangeLog) and when it > was uploaded (26.7. according to http://www.dillo.org/download/) So > the release of 2.2.1 was new to me. (I really should subscribe to the > Dillo ML. :-) Or you can subscribe to freshmeat for the announcements. (and avoid the mailing-list traffic). > I packaged Dillo 3 as that's the only Dillo version which currently > compiles in Debian, i.e. with all build-dependencies available in > Debian. > > > So hopefully Dillo will return to Debian in near future. > > As soon as Dillo 3 has been released I plan to upload it to unstable, > too. FLTK 1.3 is in unstable only for a few weeks yet, too, as the > final release happened there just recently, too. It was in > experimental for half a year or so before. Good! We have dillo-3.0 scheduled for release in August. (BTW, fltk-1.3 already made it into squeeze). Thanks for the update. -- Cheers Jorge.-

5 11

Questions about beta testing
by waltdnes＠waltdnes.org 03 Aug '11

03 Aug '11

Hi all; I joined the list recently. It's been a long time since I last ran beta software consistently. Ironically, it was the Phoenix browser beta (later to become Firebird, and then Firefox). I was unhappy about how bloated the major browser had become, and I wanted a lightweight browser. It looks like I've come full circle. Iam not a C programmer. I'm a "power user" instead. I remember about extracting the tarball, going into its directory and then executing... ./configure --with-various-options && make && make install ...but that's about all. Like the subject says, I have some questions 1) I assume that all files that go into /usr/whatever in a normal install under a package manager, will end up in /usr/local/whatever if I build from the tarball. Is that correct? 2) How do I uninstall the program? Or can I simply install new versions over top of old ones? 3) Can I assume that the configure defaults are the reverse of the options? E.g. if the "configure" file has... --enable-ssl Enable ssl, https (ALPHA CODE) --enable-ipv6 Build with support for IPv6 --disable-cookies Don't compile support for cookies --disable-png Disable support for PNG images ...then are the defaults --disable-ssl --disable-ipv6 --enable-cookies --enable-png ? Which one is the default here? Hopefully the "enable" version. --disable-dependency-tracking speeds up one-time build --enable-dependency-tracking do not reject slow dependency extractors 4) I run Gentoo linux, in 64-bit mode on an Intel i3. The first 4 statements in my /etc/make.conf are... CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -mfpmath=sse -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe" CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" MAKEOPTS="-j1" I believe that CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS are read directly by gcc. Is CHOST used outside of Gentoo's package-management? And how do I pass MAKEOPTS to make? Yes, I know that "-j1" slows down the build process slightly. But the final binary is just as fast. And the first time you waste a couple of hours on mysterious failures during the build process, you lose all the time you "saved" with a higher "-j" value. I see it every so often on the Gentoo mailing list. Here is what I'm looking at to automate the build process... #!/bin/bash export CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -mfpmath=sse -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe" export CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" ./configure --enable-ssl && make && make install Any comments? -- Walter Dnes <waltdnes(a)waltdnes.org>

4 5

changing cursor, open() calls
by corvid＠lavabit.com 03 Aug '11

03 Aug '11

I was running dillo under strace, and whenever the cursor moves over a link, out comes: open("/home/corvid/.icons/default/cursors/hand2", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/home/corvid/.icons/default/index.theme", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/share/icons/default/cursors/hand2", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/share/icons/default/index.theme", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/share/pixmaps/default/cursors/hand2", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open("/usr/share/pixmaps/default/index.theme", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) ..and looks for an xterm cursor when over a Fl_Input, and then looks for things like open("/usr/share/X11/locale/compose.dir", O_RDONLY) = 4 open("/usr/share/X11/locale/iso8859-1/Compose", O_RDONLY) = 4 ..now and then when dealing with the toolbar or its tooltips or something. Maybe FLTK has a deep reason for this, but I would have expected it to make up its mind when it first needed all of this during execution.

1 0

style bug, perhaps
by corvid＠lavabit.com 03 Aug '11

03 Aug '11

I reload the following, and the link border around the first image disappears. If the problem's in the style attr copying/comparison/etc., I'm failing to see it. I can see that the style has border type of none and border width of 0. I started to try to watch ":link img, :visited img {border: 1px solid}" get applied, but... <html> <body> <a href="whatever.html"> <img src="whatever.jpg"> </a> <button type='submit' name='button'"> <img src="something.jpg" alt="Search"> </button> </body> </html> BTW, Jeremy's valgrind logs have an interesting variety of 1.3 bugs for us now.

3 4

Images Not Updating (Using Cache on Page Reload)
by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

I just noticed, dillo_port1.3 using fltk-1.3 is not refreshing/reloading images when page Reload is pressed. The images I noticed not reloading are found on my weather forecast page: http://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?zoneid=AKZ222 (... thinking, this might be more in depth such as the images being embedded in javascript or something which mitigates this issue.) -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

2 1

Re: Debian Packages of 2.2.1
by jcid＠dillo.org 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

Hi, On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 03:32:57PM +0200, Klaumi Klingsporn wrote: > Hi folks, > only to let you know: I built some Debian packages of the stable > release 2.2.1 today which can be found at: > > http://apt.klaumikli.de/testing > > After doing that I saw, that Axel Beckert just built packages of dillo3 > for experimental. So hopefully Dillo will return to Debian in near > future. Excellent. Our idea is to get back into Debian with our soon to be released dillo-3.0 (based in fltk-1.3 which already made it into squeeze). > Thanks for the nice program! :-) -- Cheers Jorge.-

1 0

What's pending in dillo-3.0 for a release
by jcid＠dillo.org 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

Hi there, Fltk-1.3 is out there, and we've worked our pending issues list. What's still pending? BTW, I'm working on a focus bug (recently discovered): loading [1], and scrolling down with the down arrow key, makes the rendering area lose focus (taken by the selection list when it becomes visible), and mouse-clicking doesn't recover it. [1] http://www.dillo.org/test/form-select-multiple.html -- Cheers Jorge.-

4 11

valgrind & undeleted windows
by corvid＠lavabit.com 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

http://starurchin.org/dillo/valgrind/5125438759603857c01a7368aa40cd64873f5e… appears to have to do with the // TODO: free memory //delete window(); in CustTabs::remove_tab()

1 0

valgrind & Cancel the expected URL after offering a download (BUG#982)
by corvid＠lavabit.com 01 Aug '11

01 Aug '11

This one appears to stem from that fix http://starurchin.org/dillo/valgrind/6120526f753eba6e5646cbfe382a68d971c39d…

1 0