January 2005 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

[Dillo-dev]cookies disabled ??
by Patrick Shanahan 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

I am having cookie problems and do not understand. pat@wahoo:~> dillo my.yahoo.com dillorc:170: unexpected string constant "splash", expected symbol dillo_dns_init: Here we go! The cookies file has a file lock: disabling cookies in this dillo! Where would the file lock be? Or, how do I defeat it? -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/photos

2 2

[Dillo-dev]Broken link
by Livio Soares 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

Hi, In the main website, there is a typo causing a broken link: | <h2> Current plans </h2> | <p> | The "current plans" section has its | <a href='/plans.html'>own page</a> now<br> | (it's also accessible from the left column's top links). '/plans.html' should be '/Plans.html' best regards, Livio

2 1

[Dillo-dev]0.8.4 final just released!
by Jorge Arellano Cid 12 Jan '05

12 Jan '05

Hi there, After the testing and fixing, finally, the new dillo-0.8.4 was released today (11-01-2005). The official freshmeat announcement will be tomorrow. Please grab the tarball ASAP and report it compiles and runs :) Kelson, Phill, packagers, and interested people: Please make your tarballs ASAP as this release includes a security fix. -- Best Luck Jorge.-

4 4

[Dillo-dev]CAN-2005-12
by Jorge Arellano Cid 11 Jan '05

11 Jan '05

Hi there, Please send your reports on testing 0.8.4-rc1 ASAP. I wish to release it by Tuesday if possible. Otherwise, it seems I'll have to make a security-fix-release first and then the official 0.8.4. So far rc1 has passed flawlessly the testing process. -- Cheers Jorge.-

7 16

Re: [Dillo-dev]CAN-2005-12
by Patrick Shanahan 11 Jan '05

11 Jan '05

* Roberto Sanchez <roberto(a)familiasanchez.net> [01-10-05 18:57]: > What you want is checkinstall: have it and use it, but have a spec for dillo and would rather generate a *proper* SuSE rpm rather than use checkinstall when possible. thanks, -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/photos

1 0

[Dillo-dev]how to reply a message
by Yu Zenghui 09 Jan '05

09 Jan '05

why is what I send always a new thread? How to reply a thread?

2 1

[Dillo-dev]a_Http_init() question
by Roberto Sanchez 08 Jan '05

08 Jan '05

I was reading through some of the code and noticed this code segment in a_Http_init() (file: src/IO/http.c, line 82): gchar *env_proxy = getenv("http_proxy"); if (env_proxy && strlen(env_proxy)) HTTP_Proxy = a_Url_new(env_proxy, NULL, 0, 0, 0); if (!HTTP_Proxy && prefs.http_proxy) HTTP_Proxy = a_Url_dup(prefs.http_proxy); It appears to me that this will take first an HTTP proxy from the user's environment. Then, if one is defined in the Dillo preferences, use it to override the one from the environment. I think that the order of the tests should be reversed. The reason is that every *nix program I can think of will place precedence on settings from the environment *over* those in the configuration files. The behavior above would be confusing to an experienced *nix user. -Roberto Sanchez

2 2

[Dillo-dev]Bug #340
by Roberto Sanchez 08 Jan '05

08 Jan '05

I just tried to duplicate Bug #340, but I could not. Could anyone else confirm this? I am using today's CVS. If it is no longer reproducible, i.e., Dillo behaves correctly, maybe Jorge can mark the bug as done? -Roberto Sanchez

2 1

[Dillo-dev]Re: Re: cache replace
by Yu Zenghui 07 Jan '05

07 Jan '05

it's great! can you tell me what version does your patch apply? thank you! >there's a patch that i've been using for years, it's perfectly stable (but i'm >not sure if it applies cleanly to current versions): > >http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/pipermail/dillo-dev/2003-January/000073.html > >- Thorben

1 0

[Dillo-dev]dillo-0.8.4-rc1
by Jorge Arellano Cid 07 Jan '05

07 Jan '05

Hi, I just finished packing the tarball for dillo-0.8.4-rc1. Please excuse me for the delay, but I received a security notice that needed to be addressed (CAN-2005-0012), and I discovered a minor bug with the HEAD tag implicit-close handling code. All of this is fixed in the tarball now, plus a few comments. Please grab it ASAP, test it throughly and report your findings (finding no problems is a good sign ;). Some emphasis should be put on the newest file server dpi and on compiling on 64 bit machines. Enjoy! -- Cheers Jorge.-

4 6