- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

dillo-0.7.3.tar.bz2
by Jorge Arellano Cid Aug. 7, 2003

Aug. 7, 2003

Hi there! Yesterday I posted an email about 0.7.3 but forgot to mention the most important part: the URL! :-) There's a tarball of 0.7.3 at: http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-0.7.3.tar.bz2 The plan was to test it yesterday (it already passed my tests and Seb's too) and to announce it on Wednesday while letting our packagers some time to update them for announce time. So there it is, and will be announced on Thursday. Please get it and give it some hard testing. Kelson, Phil, Oliver: please make update your packages with it. Sorry for the mistake. Cheers Jorge.- Frank: after I upload 0.8.0-pre I'll have some time to look in your work. Now that 0.7.3 release is almost done, I guess Sebastian will have some time too (we were working on a plan for CSS, and then Sebastian had to make a detailed review of the incremental resizing mechanism because of some discovered bugs. I was working on 0.8.0-pre (plugins) and on the release). All this explanation is to state that it is not lack of interest, but lack of manpower. You'd be amazed to know all of the things I'm working in parallel. PS: the above note applies to all of you waiting for an answer from my side...

5 12

Re: [Dillo-dev] Porting Dillo to uClinux target
by Jorge Arellano Cid Aug. 6, 2003

Aug. 6, 2003

On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Manigandan wrote: > Hi, > I am trying to port dillo to uClinux based coldfire > target(5272). Has some one already did this ?What should be my > starting point ? Is there some good document for porting dillo to > new targets ? Interesting: a long time ago I was almost hired to do it! AFAIR, nobody has reported how to do it yet, but I think it is possible with the required expertise. I mean it involves not only knowing Dillo internals, but also about the porting state of the libraries it depends upon: mainly glib, GTK+ and pthread. It seems that if Dillo is upgraded to use GTK+2 the task gets a bit simpler (and we have plans to do it so). This link may help: (and an email to its author) https://mailman.uclinux.org/pipermail/uclinux-dev/2003-March/015973.html Finally, if you work for a company interested enough to sponsor the port, you can contact us to make a plan. Cheers Jorge.-

1 0

Porting Dillo to uClinux target
by Manigandan Aug. 6, 2003

Aug. 6, 2003

Hi, I am trying to port dillo to uClinux based coldfire target(5272). Has some one already did this ?What should be my starting point ? Is there some good document for porting dillo to new targets ? Thanks, Mani

1 0

Re: [Dillo-dev] Question about frames (have them working, but...)
by Frank de Lange Aug. 6, 2003

Aug. 6, 2003

On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 02:44:08PM +0300, madis wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Frank de Lange wrote: > > > http://www.geocities.com/ikbenfrank/dillo-20030804-tabs.patch.gz > > dillo with this patch shows only noframes part on some framed sites: > > http://www.hot.ee/klubipegasus/ > http://www.lamlaw.com/ That is caused by the extra <body> tag these sites add (lamlaw has a complete body section - something a frame document should not have, http://www.hot.ee/klubipegasus/ has an extra body tag in the noframes section.) The specs say something like this: Use the <frameset> tag in lieu of a <body> tag in the frame document. You may not include any other content except valid <head> and <frameset> content in a frame document. Combining frames with a conventional document containing <body> may result in unpredictable browser behavior. So, again (this is to the list), should Dillo follow the specs - and thus produce unwanted results - or try to work around the cruft some sites serve? Fixing this would be relatively easy, and the fix can be optional (--enable-pedantic or --enable-quirks or whatever...) By the way, some sites check the browser string to decide what type of content to send, these may also send non-frames content. Same goes for sites which use Javascript to test for browser versions. So even if Dillo has full frame support one day, it can still happen that a site does not serve it (functional) frame documents... Cheers//Frank -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / +46-734352015 \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +31-640037120 / \ frank(a)unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]

2 3

Segfaults with png files
by William Trenker Aug. 5, 2003

Aug. 5, 2003

I built Dillo 0.7.2 from source and it works great except when there is a png file on the web page I'm browsing. In that case, Dillo segfaults with this message on the command line: Png_error_handling: Application was compiled with png.h from libpng-1.0.12 Segmentation fault What have I done wrong? Can you give me any suggestion how to fix this? Thanks, Bill

3 2

Frame support in tab patch, found a bug...
by Frank de Lange Aug. 5, 2003

Aug. 5, 2003

Hi'all, I just noted an interesting typo in the frame support code, which makes some framed sites look really weird. I'll fix in in the next patch, but (as it is a very simple thing to change) you might want to fix your copy asap. in html.c, in the function Html_tag_open_frameset():1971 change: gint col = *frame_number / html->stack[html->stack_top].frameset_cols; gint row = *frame_number % html->stack[html->stack_top].frameset_cols; to: gint col = *frame_number % html->stack[html->stack_top].frameset_cols; gint row = *frame_number / html->stack[html->stack_top].frameset_cols; So, in essence, switch the '/' and '%' operators. It will still make a mess of the layout as it does not obey frame sizing, but at least it is a geometrically correct mess... Cheers//Frank -- WWWWW ________________________ ## o o\ / Frank de Lange \ }# \| / +46-734352015 \ \ `--| _/ <Hacker for Hire> \ `---' \ +31-640037120 / \ frank(a)unternet.org / `------------------------' [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est." ]

1 0

dillo-0.7.3-rc2
by Jorge Arellano Cid Aug. 3, 2003

Aug. 3, 2003

Hi there! Today I was decided to upload 0.8.0-pre but found some problems with one plugin. At the same time Sebastian sent me a fix for the bug that delays 0.7.3 (very simple), so most probably our current CVS holds the final 0.7.3! Please give it a hard test. If everything goes fine, it'll be released by Tuesday or Wednesday. With regard to 0.8.0-pre, please expect it to be in CVS at announce time. I know I have delayed it a lot, but it comes with much more than what was anticipated (and I believe you'd prefer it to be working right! :). Cheers Jorge.- PS: Phil, Kelson: Please be prepared to upgrade your packages before 0.7.3 is announced. That is, if testing don't say otherwise! I'll let you know one or two days before the announcement.

2 1

Re: [Dillo-dev] [PATCH] version 6 of Dillo tab patch now available
by Jorge Arellano Cid July 31, 2003

July 31, 2003

On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Kelson Vibber wrote: > On Friday 25 July 2003 10:30 am, Mattias Östergren wrote: > > When visiting a page without a title or an image dillo displays the URL in > > the windows titlebar, but the tab is empty. Feature or bug? > > That reminds me, I had a patch to add a title to the Bookmarks page - > something I noticed because of this. (attached) Done! And also tagged current CVS as "release-0_7_3-rc1". Cheers Jorge.-

1 0

Dillo as a component (library)
by Owen Cliffe July 31, 2003

July 31, 2003

2 questions: Is there an intention to have dillo expose itself as a library, i noticed sylpheed, but more generally it would be nice to have libdillo or something (for other things). When/if is gtk+2 compatibility happening? is there a patch floating around somewhere? owen -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- owen cliffe (postgraduate) Email: occ(a)cs.bath.ac.uk Department of Computer Science Web: http://www.cs.bath.ac.uk/~occ Univ. Bath, Bath, England BA2 7AY Tel: (+44) 1225 386183

1 0

bravo !!!! (fwd)
by Jorge Arellano Cid July 31, 2003

July 31, 2003

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 03:10:22 +0200 (CEST) From: nicolas.jouanne(a)free.fr To: jcid(a)softhome.net Subject: bravo !!!! thanx a lot to all dillo contributers. you simply wrote the browser of my dreams :) congratulations ! Nicolas nicolas.jouanne(a)free.fr ps: and it's effectively *fast* . thanx again and go on

1 0