September 2011 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Query dpid or running dillos
by dennisn＠dennisn.dyndns.org 07 Sep '11

07 Sep '11

Is there a way to query dillo (or dpid?) for the links it currently has open? (dpidc/dillo don't seem to have such an option :p) "dillo --xid XID" is able to access a specific window... but I guess there is no way to currently read that "property" (link). (Oh, speaking of which, the "--xid XID" feature is buggy here ... it loads the link, but renders with a wide (200pixel-ish?) margin on the left, which doesn't match the actual clickable button/link-areas on the page. Dillo version 2.2.1, fltk-1.3.0.)

2 2

dillo_port1.3 only opens so many tabs, then stops opening more tabs
by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com 07 Sep '11

07 Sep '11

I just noticed, pulling a git/svn/cvs copy yesterday, I can only open so many tabs (screen/display width?) and then Dill will stop opening new tabs after a link is clicked to open in a new tab. The only thing printed within the startx stdout is "Nav_open_url:(include_clicked_url_here) and no other activity such as "a_Nav_expect_done: repush!" or "[cookies dpi]:" etc... -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

2 3

page that redraws endlessly
by corvid＠lavabit.com 06 Sep '11

06 Sep '11

http://www.dillo.org/test/redraws.html For me, it still breaks with default dillorc options, and also with a dillo from April 2010.

3 12

prefs.show_url
by corvid＠lavabit.com 03 Sep '11

03 Sep '11

I just found that turning off prefs.show_url messes up the appearance of the UI.

1 0

valgrind still unhappy despite expect changes
by jcid＠dillo.org 02 Sep '11

02 Sep '11

On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 06:53:54PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > I can't reproduce this with valgrind-3.6.1 on wheezy. > > > > No valgrind error report before or after these debug messages: > > > > a_Nav_cancel_expect_if_eq:: calling a_Nav_cancel_expect > > Dillo: normal exit! > > > > I tested by pushing a remote URL on CLI and closing the window > > before the page data starts flowing (i.e. to cancel the > > "expect"), and also with the cancelled download code path. > > Neither one produced an error. > > I saw that there was another log entry the other day > http://starurchin.org/dillo/valgrind/7ea9fc809376ddf7dde2908e2ecf999aea2741… > > Do you think something sneaky could be going on, or does it seem > like it must come down to configuration differences somehow? AFAIS, either one is possible... Me not being able to reproduce it says it's most probably be OK for the codepaths I tested (FWIW, the ones I can see). If there's an untested codepath, well... OTOH, valgrind produces some false positives (its docs say it) and gcc optimization can also play a role... So, I'd try to find a simple test case that produces the log. Then, test this problematic codepath here, and see what comes out of the exercise. Can you reproduce the bug? Do you have a simple test case? -- Cheers Jorge.-

4 16