- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev]Can't start dpid
by Barry Kauler April 10, 2004

April 10, 2004

Ok, for those reading this thread for the first time, the problem is dpid won't start in my custom Puppy Linux distro. Maybe I've found the solution? I have a build environment, but then I run a script to create the Puppy filesystem, which copies files from the build environment. It copies dillo, dpid, dpidc into /usr/local/bin, all of the stuff in /usr/local/lib/dillo gets copied across, however, the script doesn't copy dpidrc and dillorc from /usr/local/etc, as in Puppy all of /usr is read-only. Instead, I have placed dpidrc and dillorc into ~/.dillo, except that this seems to have not been upgraded. I'm running Puppy right now and what I see in ~/.dillo are the files .073 cookiesrc dillorc So, is this my problem? I just checked the dates on those files, and they are from the old 0.7.3 version. It does seem that my oversight is to blame here! One question though, is there any problem with continuing to use the old dillorc? I ask this as when people upgrade to the latest Puppy they may have modified dillorc and I don't want to just overwrite their dillorc file. Looks like Puppy and Dillo are back in business! Puppy v0.8.5 should be out soon, like maybe another week. Regards, Barry Kauler On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 00:56:07 -0600 Barry Kauler <bkauler(a)goosee.com> wrote: > Ok, I've joined the dillo-dev list! > > On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 08:13:17 -0400 (CLT) > Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)dillo.org> wrote: > > > > I should also explain that I have my own distro, Puppy Linux, > > > and everything is compiled against uClibc, not glibc. > > > (www.goosee.com/puppy) > > > > Oh, it would be interesting to have Dillo running under uClibc! > > Dillo has been in Puppy right from the start (which was about one > year ago). A few months ago I changed over to uClibc and recompiled > everything, including Dillo, and all was well until I upgraded to > Dillo v0.8.0. > > > Check if you can run them crom the CLI: > > > > cd /usr/local/lib/dillo/dpi/hello > > ./hello.filter.dpi > > I'm doing this as root. When I try this I get: > > hello.dpi:: starting... > > and that's it, nothing more, doesn't exit until I ctrl-c. > No error message. > ...what is it supposed to do? > > Regards, > Barry Kauler > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev

1 0

[Dillo-dev]Re: bugfix for bug#500
by Jorge Arellano Cid April 8, 2004

April 8, 2004

On Thu, 8 Apr 2004, Andreas Mueller wrote: > Hi, Hi! > the attached small patch fixes bug#500. > > > Andreas Thanks a lot, that one was hard to chase! Commited. Cheers Jorge.-

1 0

[Dillo-dev]Theme for Dillo 0.8.0
by Gregg April 8, 2004

April 8, 2004

Hi all, I made a button theme for 0.8.0 - Cobalt. Enjoy! -- Gregg

2 1

[Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 and Dillo's future
by John April 8, 2004

April 8, 2004

As a major fan of lite-weight apps I am very unhappy that so many of my favorite applications are being ported to GTK2. I've been following the Dillo Dev list and I know that there is an effort to port Dillo over to FLTK which may be a good alternative to GTK2. But I have to ask, why not just keep using GTK 1.2? GTK 1.2 is mature, and lite. Perhaps it will start an effort to keep GTK 1.x alive? John

2 1

[Dillo-dev]why use "ccc chain" instead of calling the function directly?
by Lei Jin April 7, 2004

April 7, 2004

Use "ccc chain" mechanism makes the code seeming uniform. But it cause the source code difficult to understand because lots of indirect function call and variety of parameters. I wonder whether we can call the target function directly instead of using "ccc chain", but I do not know if there is difference between these two methods ??? ( such as the process's address space??? )..... --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? 惠普TT游戏剧，玩游戏，中大奖！

2 3

[Dillo-dev]New dillo user (contributor?)
by January Weiner April 7, 2004

April 7, 2004

Hello, first of all, let me thank you for this great piece of software. It's fast, it's simple, it keeps up good Unix traditions -- small, efficient programs which do one job. I have used dillo a couple of years ago, but it was a little too brittle and not mature enough for me, especially due to the lack of tables (or was it CSS?) -- anyway, it is very nice now[*]. A thing that's really lacking (at least for me) -- is a.. man page. I'm an unbelievably traditional when it comes to man pages, mostly because of the apropos database[#]. Further, an introductory readme page for users (with shortcuts etc., and not necessarily compilator options) would also be a nice thing to have, I think. How about that -- if you do not have anything principally against man pages / readme's for newbie's, I'll write it, and promise to keep up with Dillo's releases for the next 12 months. I do not have much time, but at least a rudimentary man page should be in each programs distribution. Is there any document available on Dillos shortcuts and configuration, or should I download the sources right away? Regards, January P.S. A nice detail: when running dillo for the first time, make it copy the dillorc into ~/.dillo/. This is the first place a literate Unix user will look for a configuration when he or she notices that Dillo created ~/.dillo/. Tested on three individuals :-) [*] the only thing I really miss is the support for ISO-8859-2. [#] besides, it took me a couple of minutes to figure out that "s <keyword>" is not a thing you should type in the address widget, but an abbreviation for "ctrl-s keyword", esp. because ctrl-s is such a widespread shortcut for "save". -- ------------ Dr January Weiner 3 ------------------+--------------- Division of Bioinformatics, University of Muenster | Schlo�platz 4 (+49)(251)21634 | D48149 M�nster http://www.uni-muenster.de/Biologie.Botanik/ebb/ | Germany

1 1

[Dillo-dev]Disable toolbars
by Florian Angehrn April 7, 2004

April 7, 2004

if i don't want both toolbars, what do i have to change in the sourcecode? many thanks for your great product (and an answer :)!

2 1

[Dillo-dev]Can't start dpid
by Barry Kauler April 7, 2004

April 7, 2004

Hi, I'm not on the list, so hope this can be submitted! Kindly also reply a copy to bk(a)goosee.com I have been following Dillo for sometime, as a user, and recently upgraded to v0.8.0. Problem is, when I click on a ftp url, the message: "Error: can't start dpid daemon" So, I tried to start dpid directly on the commandline: # dpid # dpid.c:352: register_all: fatal error: -can't find the directory for dpis So, is there something missing here? -- what is dpis? Appreciate any advice on this! Regards, Barry Kauler

2 1

Re: [Dillo-dev]progress on AIX? (fwd)
by Jorge Arellano Cid April 7, 2004

April 7, 2004

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 22:29:57 +0200 From: Riccardo Mottola <rollei(a)tiscalinet.it> To: Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)dillo.org> Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev]progress on AIX? Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Riccardo wrote: > > > > [...] > > > Please try changing these to int. This is: > > > > > > #define socklen_t int > > I did that right now and recompiled. Only a bunch of files recompiled. > > > > I still get the same SIGILL, illegal instruction. > > Does current CVS produce SIGILL too? This time, boostrapping and configuring was like a charm. but I get a SIGILL anyway... And no usable bt, as always. Program received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. 0x0 in ?? () from /usr/local/build/dillo-cvs/dillo/src/dillo (gdb) bt #0 0x0 in ?? () from /usr/local/build/dillo-cvs/dillo/src/dillo clueless. I remember there was a german guy on the list who used AIX. -R

1 0

[Dillo-dev]progress on AIX?
by Riccardo April 6, 2004

April 6, 2004

Hello, I posted the buildlog I got on AIX... did someone had a look at it to see if there are some warnings or errors that could explain the brokeness of dillo on aix? -Ric

2 4