- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

re: fltk binary
by David McBain March 25, 2006

March 25, 2006

hi dillo.org, i'm sure i've seen mention of dillo fltk based static binaries being available somewhere, but i can't see anything like this on main site. please let me know if i've been hallucinating or not! cheers, dmcbain __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

1 0

dillo on cygwin native
by David Dombrowsky March 24, 2006

March 24, 2006

So far the only easily compilable web browser I can find for the cygwin platform is dillo. It compiles and starts up just fine, but any time it has to use the dpid daemon, it dies. The source of the error has something to do with the socket handling in the source for dpid. Does anyone have any experience building dillo on native cygwin (cygwin-X)? Also, what about the fltk2 toolkit? I can't get that to build in cygwin either. I know that's another project, but dillo directly depends on it. Any help would be greatly appreciated. One of my desktops is empty and I need to put a browser there. -David Dombrowsky

2 2

dillo-0.8.6-rc1
by Jorge Arellano Cid March 24, 2006

March 24, 2006

Hi there, The new dillo-0.8.6-rc1.tar.bz2 tarball is ready for testing! Please grab it from: http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-0.8.6-rc1.tar.bz2 ... test and send feedback. Packagers are encouraged to include the statically linked FLTK2 GUI for downloads in their end-user packages. -- Cheers Jorge.-

4 4

dillo and no-cache
by digitek March 23, 2006

March 23, 2006

Hello All. Nice browser! I noticed 0.8.5 loads pages from cache regardless of the 'content=no-cache' meta tag. Near as I can tell from the mailing list, this is by design. I also found the no-cache patch for 0.8.2 and applied to 0.8.5 (by hand). Is this the best way right now to get cache control working? Thanks -- digitek(a)charter.net key id: 0xF6FA6D1E huh?: http://google.com/search?q=gnupg+secure+email

3 4

[article] trimming down autoconf's configure scripts by using pkg-config
by Enrico 'nekrad' Weigelt March 23, 2006

March 23, 2006

Hi folks, here's a little article I wrote about an approach for encapsulating platform dependent stdc-lib fixes (ie. some platforms have broken string handling, etc) behind pkg-config. It is mostly directed on autoconf (It is the one I have most of my daily trouble with), but of course the approach works with other buildsystems, even plain make, too. The permanent URL of the article: * http://www.metux.de/articles/coding/trimming-down-autoconf-with-pkg-config I'm also currently working on concrete wrapper packages: * http://wiki.metux.de/public/OSS_QM_Taskforce/projects/stdc-pkgconfig Comments and suggestions please to the Maillist: oss-qm-discuss(a)metux.de Thanks. -- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service phone: +49 36207 519931 www: http://www.metux.de/ fax: +49 36207 519932 email: info(a)metux.de cellphone: +49 174 7066481 ---------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Progress on porting to FLTK2?
by Roberto C. Sanchez March 22, 2006

March 22, 2006

Hello, I became interested in Dillo a while back and even made some small contributions and helped fix some bugs, but I was eventually disuaded by the fact that Dillo uses GTK+. I was happy when I heard that Dillo would be ported to FLTK. Has there been any progress on this? I would like to start contributing again, but I have not seen anything other than a few mailing list posts in the archive and a mention of it on the "Current Plans" page. -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://familiasanchez.net/~roberto

5 6

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo-0.8.6-rc1
by Jorge Arellano Cid March 22, 2006

March 22, 2006

Hi Francis, Thanks for the good feedback. On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 09:21:21AM +0000, Francis Daly wrote: > On Tue, Mar 21, 2006 at 02:13:38PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > Hi there, > > > ... test and send feedback. > > Some minor thing that you might like to tidy before release: > > * ChangeLog has a few entries with a leading hyphen. Yes, this visually separates batches of patches by the same authors. > * ChangeLog says > > * Added dpi/downloads.cc (Default FLTK2-based GUI for downloads dpi). > and > * Made the downloads plugin dillo-cookie aware. > > It's only the *old* plugin which handles cookies. (And modifying the new > one to is more than just a two line addition, because the arguments are > counted in (I think) two other places.) But overall, it's no regression > from 0.8.5, so no problem. It just might be worth clarifying the > distinction. Ooops. This is a BUG! I'll clarify the distinction in rc2. > * README says > > Here's a list of some well known problems: > > * no FRAMES rendering > * no https -- read the FAQ to enable a protoype. > > while the code now defaults to https enabled. Change README or change > dpi/https.c > > If you choose to change README and you want to keep at least two problems, > you could mention "javascript" or "http authentication". But only if > you consider their absence a problem ;-) > > Leaving https enabled will get the code tested more, but will likely cause > a warning for each https: url accessed, unless the user's distribution > happens to store trusted root certs in /etc/ssl/certs. > > You can choose whether you want https.c polished more before being exposed > to the world. Possibly a note in README or FAQ saying "dillo reads root > certs from the directories /etc/ssl/certs or $HOME/.dillo/certs; they > should be named after the hash of the certificate subject name -- see > e.g. the openssl x509 documentation, '-hash' option for more information." Yes, this needs some fixes. I'll disable the https dpi as usual (it's too rough now, and it needs a conversion from dpi filter to dpi server too). Sending the users to dig the openssl x509 documentation is too much, and the https dpi hangs when there are concurrent https requests. As for the known problems, I'll add "http authentication". :-) > (Yes, I know, if I *really* cared, there'd be patches in this mail. But > I'm not sure if you're looking at releasing in a day or a week, and > think the things should be mentioned early so you can consider whether > you want to change any of them.) I think more or less one week. Until the release candidate is tested and not having new problems. -- Cheers Jorge.- PS: Your email reply was addressed to me, not to the list. (usually a MUA choice that needs a tweak)

1 0

Refresh via external signal?
by Bill Gatliff March 21, 2006

March 21, 2006

Greetings again! If I have an instance of Dillo already running, is there a way for an external program to tell it to browse a certain URL? I'm trying to "drive" Dillo from another application as part of a mobility-impaired application... Thanks! b.g. -- Bill Gatliff bgat(a)billgatliff.com

4 5

[mike@easysw.com: Re: FLTK2-based Dillo for Debian installer]
by Jorge Arellano Cid March 21, 2006

March 21, 2006

Hi there, A follow-up of FLTK2-based Dillo for Debian installer. -- Cheers Jorge.-

2 2

Audio?
by Bill Gatliff March 21, 2006

March 21, 2006

Greetings! Can Dillo "do audio" for web pages that have it? b.g. -- Bill Gatliff bgat(a)billgatliff.com

2 2