- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

[Dillo-dev]https (eg for posting to ps2 bulletin boards)
by robert w hall June 2, 2004

June 2, 2004

Every time I read the playstation2-linux lists I realise how very useful dillo will be when it gets just a little further. How's the short/medium term future of https looking?(*) If an official plugin is in the offing then that's probably what we should all wait for. Otherwise, is the patch from 0.7 resurrectable?? Bob (*You need ssl to post to the ps2 bulletin board) -- robert w hall

3 4

[Dillo-dev]dillo as a debian package ..?
by Jorge Arellano Cid June 1, 2004

June 1, 2004

Hi! It's been a long time since the debian package for Dillo is not updated. Since 0.7.3 to be accurate. :-( I've contacted Phil and, surprisingly, the only reason for them not being made is lack of time. Is here a Debian developer that can take the burden, or help Phil, or at least provide us with an x86 .deb to link to from the download page? It seems important because Debian lingering on 0.7.3 implicitly passes the (wrong) message of the latter versions of dillo not being worth an upgrade. TIA Jorge.- ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Jesper Olsen <__lazer __at phreaker__ net__> To: jcid(a)dillo.org Subject: dillo as a debian package ..? hello there .. Is there somewhere around where i can get dillo-0.8.1 as a .deb file?? i can't find it, i've almost looked everywhere :s MaNN, thank you for a wonderful browser .. it runs top stable and fast on my 166mhz .. well, it is a shame that i can't get the new versions of the browser ! DILLO ROCKS!!!!! - lazer

3 5

Re: [Dillo-dev]Some remarks on the UI
by Nicola Girardi June 1, 2004

June 1, 2004

This is what I replied privately to Sebastian: > BTW, it is not very obvious, that there is a menu behind these two > buttons. Perhaps there should be, in the icon, a small arrow > directed downdwards, or so. In fact I didn't ever discovered there was such (useful) menu. :-( > (ii) It provides a function for attaching a menu in a better way, > than we have currently, for the "Back" and "Forward" menus, > and for the bug meter. Another menu I didn't catch, the bug meter menu. :-) > Comments welcome. Very nice. :-)

1 0

Re: [Dillo-dev]page increment (was: very simple question, and many kudos!)
by Sebastian Geerken May 31, 2004

May 31, 2004

On Mon, May 31, Brian Hechinger wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 03:09:03PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > > > Scrolling half a page is actually standard behaviour of Gtk, look > > e.g. at gtk_layout_size_allocate() (in gtklayout.c), which is more or > > less responsible for this in our case, since our code uses > > GdkAdjustment::page_increment, which is set there. > > hmmmmmm. can't say i care for that behavior. maybe i should whine to the GTK > folks and see if i can either get that changed, or at least get it setup so > there is some way to override it at run/compile time? They won't probably change it, especially since dillo depends on Gtk 1.2, which development has been closed, AFAIK. > > The attached patch "solves" it, but I'm not sure, wether the standard > > behaviour should be overridden. > > how hard would it be to make it a runtime option? something in dillorc? that > way you can have standard behavior and also the option to change its behavior > to satisfy people like me? Actually, it envolves reading Havoc Pennington's essay "Free software and good user interfaces" (http://ometer.com/free-software-ui.html) especially the section "The Question of Preferences", and considering, whether or not this configuration option should be added. Actually, I'd rather like it either having applied or not (not configurable), the others should apply the patch. (Adding the code is BTW rather simple, just look at how other options are handled in "prefs.c".) > how about this. let me know when the CVS tree stablizes and i'll write that > for you. It will probably still take some time, it is a bit more difficult than I thought. Sebastian

1 0

[Dillo-dev]helper applications and their uses
by Randy May 25, 2004

May 25, 2004

Hello, First of all,let me say that i don't know a command-line from a chorus line-my feeble knowlege of Linux consists mainly of downloading Apt and Synaptic for my RH7.3 and FC1 distros,and handling it all from the GUI. Just letting you know that your'e dealing with a novice here. : ) I like the concept behind Dillo,simple and fast.I understand that you might be working on a version for frames later on,which would be even better of course.My question though-without reliance on the usual Mozilla plug-ins(which Galeon,Epiphany and Firefox also use) is there anything I can download as a helper application? Would the full Java,for example,interact at all with Dillo when browsing the Web? Would Realplayer,or Gxine with Real plug-ins(i'm on Gnome,of course). Thanks in Advance, Randy

2 1

[Dillo-dev]Dillo RPM available for Yellow Dog Linux 3.0
by Kelson Vibber May 25, 2004

May 25, 2004

In case anyone's interested, I posted an RPM for Yellow Dog Linux 3.0 over the weekend. The usual place: http://www.hyperborea.org/software/dillo/ -- Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

1 0

[Dillo-dev]0.8.1 text centering error? (fwd)
by Jorge Arellano Cid May 23, 2004

May 23, 2004

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: 18 May 2004 04:15:11 PDT From: Gregg <dude(a)scorpiorising.ca> To: Dillo <dillo-dev(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de> Subject: [Dillo-dev]0.8.1 text centering error? Hello, I have compiled and run Dillo 0.8.1 flawlessly on Debian woody. However, I notice the browser "centering text" that wasn't on 0.8.0 and earlier. Example: http://www.cknw.com - my daily news, now shows the headlines as centred. Is this supposed to be? Thanks, -- Gregg _______________________________________________ Dillo-dev mailing list Dillo-dev(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev

1 0

[Dillo-dev]Re: White spaces handling (was: Weird glitch with rendering)
by Jorge Arellano Cid May 23, 2004

May 23, 2004

Hi Sebastian, > Just FYI: I remember from the old discussion, that DwPage originally > collapsed spaces (i.e. calls to a_Dw_page_add_space), and that I > suggested some changes, so that this is not done anymore. Your patch > would reverse this change again. > > The discussion goes attached. I read the whole thread you sent me. BTW, the whole whitespace issue re-started when I found one of the patches you mentioned. I then read the past emails, and started to try to follow. It is not easy to make a clean picture of it though! --This mainly because of the way it used to be handled inside Dillo and because the SPECS seem not definitive in this matter. Here I'll try to cite past emails and comment my current thoughts: > [...] > This is because a_Dw_page_add_space is called twice, and this function > does actually not add a space, but change the current one. I've worked > on two solutions: > > 1. The first patch (underlined-spaces-clean.diff) changes the > behavior of a_Dw_page_add_space, but needs some changes in the > HTML parser, to control better when this function is called, > i.e. to ignore spaces after <A> and before </A>. This one seems the best candidate. With regard to fixing the parser for ignoring these spaces, see my comments below. > 2. The second one (underlined-spaces-kludgy.diff) tries to adjust > spaces, depending on rather hairy conditions. It works already > (if I'm not wrong, it has quite the same results as the code > before, except the bug). This option is no longer valid. As you clearly described: <q> > > > 2. The second one (underlined-spaces-kludgy.diff) tries to adjust > > > spaces, depending on rather hairy conditions. It works already > > > (if I'm not wrong, it has quite the same results as the code > > > before, except the bug). > > As I've now noticed, this will not work for CSS, e.g. the following > code: > > One non-underlined word > > will be displayed: > > One non-underlined word > ---- ----- > > just because this patch lets DwPage assume something about the > document structure (change from non-underline to underline == > beginning of a tag) which it can (and should) not. > </q> Now, > > Despite of the file names, I'm not sure if the changes in the HTML > parser can be done cleanly. So, if you think that this is difficult to > realize, apply the second patch. Especially, there is probably also an > other DwPage function necessary to remove again the last space, when > </A> is read after a space. I believe the parser is not very hard to modify for ignoring the spaces as patch 1.- requires. The problem is that the SPEC is not clear about exactly how these spaces should be collapsed. For instance: > A different case is "Some text". Your patch will make > "Some text" of it, but it should be really be > "Some text." Yes, I agree, "collapsing" here should be: 'Some text' => 'Some text' as you note. but what do we do with this: 'Some text' If we ignore white space after the start tag and before the end tag, it becomes 'Sometext' (with no space at all!) If we "collapse" as the SPEC says should be done, we have two possibilities: 'Some text' (as it was: underline the whitespace) and 'Some text' (move the space out of the tag) AFAICT, the SPEC leaves the choice open, and advices HTML authors against whitespace inside the tags. IMO, always collapsing white space after the start tag and before the end tag is the simplest to implement. Even more, as the SPEC doesn't define what to do in this case, it's an option left to the User Agent: <q source='HTML4.01 SPEC, 9.1'> In order to avoid problems with SGML line break rules and inconsistencies among extant implementations, authors should not rely on user agents to render white space immediately after a start tag or immediately before an end tag. Thus, authors, and in particular authoring tools, should write: We offer free <A>technical support</A> for subscribers. and not: We offer free<A> technical support </A>for subscribers. </q> Now, this solution would also account for the special SGML line break rules: <q source='HTML-4.01 SPEC B.3.1'> SGML (see [ISO8879], section 7.6.1) specifies that a line break immediately following a start tag must be ignored, as must a line break immediately before an end tag. This applies to all HTML elements without exception. The following two HTML examples must be rendered identically: Thomas is watching TV. Thomas is watching TV. So must the following two examples: <A>My favorite Website</A> <A> My favorite Website </A> </q> Note that Firebird doesn't follow the SGML line break rules! This is not to say we should follow, but that we may find some buggy pages out there, but at least at this point the SPEC is quite clear. ;) > I'm not completely sure, we should carefully evaluate the specs, I'd > suggest to delay this for the 0.8.2 release. Neither I am sure! :-) At this point I see that applying patch 1, plus making the parser ignore whitespaces after a start tag and before an end tag is a correct solution that can endure a reality test. I'll start coding it. Please let me know your thoughts or any point I'm still missing. Best Jorge.- PS: This work is for 0.8.2.

2 9

[Dillo-dev]BugTrack
by Jorge Arellano Cid May 22, 2004

May 22, 2004

Hi there! Dillo's bugtrack was just updated so email addresses are mangled with images to protect from SPAM robots. The "submitter" camp was also added, so we can contact the poster for details. Cheers Jorge.-

1 0

[Dillo-dev]javascript links
by Jorge Arellano Cid May 22, 2004

May 22, 2004

Hi there, The CVS is just updated for 0.8.2-pre. The first patch is a tiny handler for javascript links. It's very simple, it will try to make a normal link from a javascript-based href. Please test it and tell me how it works. Cheers Jorge.-

1 0