January 2012 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Horizontal scrolling with mouse buttons
by jcid＠dillo.org 07 Aug '12

07 Aug '12

On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 02:18:33PM -0400, saulgoode(a)flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com wrote: > Quoting Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)dillo.org>: > > > Please try dillo-3.0-pre, following these directions [1]. > >Then report back how it goes. > > > > [1] http://www.dillo.org/source.html > > With that build, the horizontal scroll buttons are inactive. To my > mind this is satisfactory behavior as it does not interfere with the > vertical scrolling of the mouse wheel (previously the only way to > restore vertical wheel scrolling was to restart the program). Good! This looks like an issue with fltk-1.3. FWIW, inside fltk-1.3 src/Fl_x.cxx:1443, there's no code to handle those buttons. Having something like the following may be worth a try (if you're a coder): if (xevent.xbutton.button == Button4) { Fl::e_dy = -1; // Up event = FL_MOUSEWHEEL; } else if (xevent.xbutton.button == Button5) { Fl::e_dy = +1; // Down event = FL_MOUSEWHEEL; + } else if (xevent.xbutton.button == Button6) { + Fl::e_dx = -1; // Left + event = FL_MOUSEWHEEL; + } else if (xevent.xbutton.button == Button7) { + Fl::e_dx = +1; // Right + event = FL_MOUSEWHEEL; } else { Fl::e_state |= (FL_BUTTON1 << (xevent.xbutton.button-1)); event = FL_PUSH; checkdouble(); } > Thank you for your response. :) -- Cheers Jorge.-

3 2

TitanTV does not show the default channel listing
by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com 02 Feb '12

02 Feb '12

Just a quick note, having a pain in the arse viewing titantv.com channel listings. Seems Dillo keeps pulling an unwanted channel listing page instead of my default channel listing. I even deleted all other channel listings and restarted Dillo (and dpid, including rebooting) and I'm still getting a unwanted listing. Changed user agent too. ELinks seems to be doing similar, but I once got it to display my default channel listing without having to delete other listings. But now even ELinks is now showing the same listing that Dillo displays. Only browser that seems to work is Seamonkey (Mozilla) here.

2 5

Ping
by jcid＠dillo.org 31 Jan '12

31 Jan '12

Hi, This is just a test to check mailing list delivery works OK. -- Cheers Jorge.-

2 1

No subject
by bogus＠does.not.exist.com 30 Jan '12

30 Jan '12

server screwing around and trying to push more eye candy. -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

1 0

Handling of HTML entities without terminating semicolon (bug 1043)
by qartis＠gmail.com 08 Jan '12

08 Jan '12

Currently any inline HTML entity will be converted if the whole entity name matches up to a non-alnum, even if there is no trailing semicolon. For example, foo&lt,bar would be converted, but foo&ltbar wouldn't. This means that an improperly encoded url like /foo.html?a=b&lang=en would not work, because &lang would be translated to a Left Angle Bracket. But we can't just require all HTML entites to have a terminating semicolon, because that would cause worse behavior on all the broken websites that rely on lazy entity termination. Webkit has a fairly good solution for this. Their entity list (http://trac.webkit.org/browser/trunk/Source/WebCore/html/parser/HTMLEntityN…) has defined duplicate elements without trailing semicolons for some tags only. By my count, 106/2125 tags have a duplicate zero-semicolon definition. Does anybody know how Webkit chose which tags are valid without a semicolon? Is that defined in an RFC somewhere? Another option would be to require entites to have a terminating semicolon when they're part of a tag attribute. That's assuming most pages that encode their tag attributes do it properly. For example, <a href="error.cgi?msg=Unauthorized&nbsp."> wouldn't behave as it used to.

1 0

Happy new year!
by jcid＠dillo.org 02 Jan '12

02 Jan '12

Hi, It is with great pleasure that I come bearing good wishes for this new year (2012). 2011 ended being very good for he Dillo project: > Hi there, > > Please receive my best wishes and thanks to the team. > > Let's hope this year will help our project thrive again, in > both the distros and the collaboration agreement we're trying to > make. > > (-: 2011 :-) As you can see, those wishes became real during the year! Hopefully 2012 will see floats and a continuation of our collaboration agreement. Ah, and it may also materialize a very good event WRT the development team. :) Cheers! -- Cheers Jorge.-

1 0