- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

[PATCH]: escape illegal characters instead of stripping them

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:30:37AM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 07:15:28PM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > > > This patch makes Dillo escape all illegal URL characters instead > > of stripping them. > > Committed an improved version. Yes, that *is* neater. I'll remember that! Jeremy Henty

Jan. 31, 2008

Re: patch: image input as submit input

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 07:43:26PM +0000, place wrote: > In which I display my oh-so-impressive ability to, uhhh, uncomment code... :-) > It mostly just allows one to discover that there are lots > of paypal buttons out there. Half-committed. i.e. I left the outer spam_safe if, as an incentive to implement the real image input widget! ;-) -- Cheers Jorge.-

Jan. 31, 2008

[PATCH]: escape illegal characters instead of stripping them

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 07:15:28PM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > HREF attributes often contain unescaped spaces, even though this is > illegal. This is unfortunate because Dillo deletes illegal URL > characters, which breaks the link. See, eg. > > http://www.labreporter.com/Films.html > > This patch makes Dillo escape all illegal URL characters instead of > stripping them. Committed an improved version. -- Cheers Jorge.-

Jan. 31, 2008

Various minor patches

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:40:52PM +0100, Christian Kellermann wrote: > * Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)dillo.org> [080130 15:36]: > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 03:21:41PM +0100, Christian Kellermann wrote: > > > * Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)dillo.org> [080130 15:06]: > > > > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:51:19AM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > > > > On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 05:10:19PM +0100, Christian Kellermann wrote: > > > > > > * Johannes Hofmann <Johannes.Hofmann(a)gmx.de> [080125 20:21]: > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 04:03:47PM +0100, Christian Kellermann wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Thomas-Martin Seck wrote: > > > > > > > > > > 1) detect_libiconv.diff > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > src/decode.c uses iconv_open but - at least on FreeBSD - libiconv > > > > > > > > > > is not in the default linker path, making the build abort. Add > > > > > > > > > > a simple test to configure.in to check for libiconv's presence > > > > > > > > > > and usability and a substitution for ICONV_LIBS to src/Makefile.am. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Very nice! The same problem exists on DragonFly... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This breaks configure for me (OpenBSD/386 -stable). seems the test does not use the LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib... My knowledge (and motivation) to fiddle with this autoconf hell is limited, so I'd kindly hand the ball over to someone else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What exactly is breaking? Can you provide config.log? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here on DragonFly linking was failing with unresolved symbols, > > > > > > > but it turned out that the problem was caused by a libiconv > > > > > > > package that was no longer needed. The iconv stuff is now handled > > > > > > > in libc on DragonFly... > > > > > > > > > > > > I have attached the log. Seems like the function signature differs > > > > > > on OpenBSD a bit. The testcase modified as such that it includes > > > > > > <iconv.h> and calling iconv_open("",""); works for me when doint > > > > > > it manually. > > > > > > > > > > > > I don't know what happens here... > > > > > > > > > > > > Kind regards, > > > > > > > > > > Does it fail with current CVS? > > > > > > > > Sorry, from the log it's clear it doesn't. > > > > > > > > This page seems to have good info: > > > > > > > > http://synflood.at/blog/index.php?/plugin/tag/bsd > > > > > > > > (my understanding of German is barely for survival. ;). > > > > > > > > > > Yes it does describe my problem, but how do we fix this in a portable way? > > > > > > Before this patch, we had no test for iconv. Did it work for you then? > > > In a way yes. because my solution was to add -liconv to my LDFLAGS. Did the new test in configure.in work? I assume not because of the silence. You wrote: > In a way yes. because my solution was to add -liconv to my LDFLAGS. and > This breaks configure for me (OpenBSD/386 -stable). seems the > test does not use the LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib... My knowledge > (and motivation) to fiddle with this autoconf hell is limited, > so I'd kindly hand the ball over to someone else. I assume you set LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib... but this is expected to be done by the test at configure.in:96. The test can fail though! Would you mind posting the output of: cpp -v in your system. -- Cheers Jorge.-

Jan. 31, 2008

an experiment in widget coloring (with code)

by place＠gobigwest.com

Jorge wrote: > I like the idea, even the look of coloured widgets, but some people may > prefer the old look. > > Would you implement this as a dillorc2 preference? e.g. > > # When set to yes, form elements follow the color style of the page. > widget_colors=YES All right.

Jan. 31, 2008

a highlighting colors proposal (with code)

by place＠gobigwest.com

Jorge wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:31:15AM +0000, place wrote: > > (Maybe this one deserves to be called a patch. It seems pretty clearly to > > be an improvement to me, at least...) > > > > > > If a page has, e.g., black text on a black background, it is nice to > > be able to highlight it to read it. > > The idea for this problem (and others) is to have a small button, > like the img-on/off, with a toolbox icon. When clicked the page is > rendered using the force_my_colors style. > > The idea is to eventually be able to specify a CSS stylesheet > that defines what "my_colors" is. And the button applies it on the > rendered page. > > After developing the table apportion patch, it became somehow clear > to me that the next big step to undertake is to start parsing some CSS. > If we add a very simple parser and hook a few elements, then it can > grow incrementally. > > This is not as hard as it looks because we presented a working prototype > of this at FOSDEM 2005 with Sebastian. The parser should be no problem (as > I know the html parser well), but for the CSS-dw2 hooks we'd need to ask > Sebastian (and hope for some free time on his part) or to dig > in the old prototype code and try to figure it out. > > I'd much prefer Sebastian to advice us because he has the CSS model > and dw2 design in his head, and can save us from a boat load of trouble. > > > Note: with regard to this patch. Would you mind implement the > toolbox-button/force-my-colors approach? > > Note2: if this kind of highlight is regarded as better than the > former, I have no problems to commit. These are independent ideas. I started trying to formulate questions because it made sense to do things that fit with how it would eventually work with CSS -- and I don't really know too clearly how things are supposed to work with CSS -- but... well, if your Devious Maintainer Plan was to get me to say "Oh, let's not worry about forcing colors for now, and try to get some css going," then you have succeeded.

Jan. 31, 2008

New table layout rocks!

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 09:24:57PM +0100, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:29:48AM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:50:58PM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 02:39:17PM +0100, Diego . wrote: > > > > > > > After this effort maybe the "Rewrite of tables code" item on Plans > > > > page ( http://www.dillo.org/Plans.html) can change from > > > > yellow(prototype at least) to green (recently finished) > > > > > > Sadly this may a little too hasty. I am currently investigating bugs > > > in the handling of ROWSPAN. Also, my impression is that performance > > > has badly degraded for tables with many rows. > > > > Degraded since previous dillo2 or dillo1 version? > > > > AFAIS, the main bottleneck in dillo2 still is too many redraw requests. > > Yes, that's probabely true. > > However, I currently don't see any low hanging fruit in this area. > dillo1 also redraws all the time. It is just not visible because it > draws to some offscreen area first and then copies the result to the > screen. And what's more important, drawing was cheaper without > antialiased fonts... My feeling is exactly. One cheap way to avoid redraws is to throttle them at let say 3 seconds, and to force one when the parsing is done with the full page (close time). Another, cleaner approach, may be to avoid unnecessary redraw requests from the textblock and table widgets (or other source). I haven't investigated this in detail, but for instance, Textblock::wordWrap always sets "mustQueueResize = true". If the Textblock knows that the just added contents are out of the displayed area, and that it didn't grow wider/thiner, we may avoid the request until it is displayed, or page ends, whatever comes first. Disclaimer: these are just ideas, no proof of concept yet. -- Cheers Jorge.-

Jan. 30, 2008

an experiment in widget coloring (with code)

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:06:58PM +0000, place wrote: > With my color settings, my buttons were light grey with unreadable > white labels. Well, that's no good. > > And standard gui widget colors scream > "I'm using a Windows Office Productivity Suite!" to me. :-) > So here is something to play with. I currently have the widgets using > background color and the labels/text either black or white. I like the idea, even the look of coloured widgets, but some people may prefer the old look. Would you implement this as a dillorc2 preference? e.g. # When set to yes, form elements follow the color style of the page. widget_colors=YES > fltk_black to make black work right Will be committed after writing this email. > widget_colors.dillo to set backgroundColor in Style. > widget_colors.dw where you set the widget colors. Will expect your answer. -- Cheers Jorge.-

Jan. 30, 2008

a highlighting colors proposal (with code)

by jcid＠dillo.org

Hi, On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:31:15AM +0000, place wrote: > (Maybe this one deserves to be called a patch. It seems pretty clearly to > be an improvement to me, at least...) > > > If a page has, e.g., black text on a black background, it is nice to > be able to highlight it to read it. The idea for this problem (and others) is to have a small button, like the img-on/off, with a toolbox icon. When clicked the page is rendered using the force_my_colors style. The idea is to eventually be able to specify a CSS stylesheet that defines what "my_colors" is. And the button applies it on the rendered page. After developing the table apportion patch, it became somehow clear to me that the next big step to undertake is to start parsing some CSS. If we add a very simple parser and hook a few elements, then it can grow incrementally. This is not as hard as it looks because we presented a working prototype of this at FOSDEM 2005 with Sebastian. The parser should be no problem (as I know the html parser well), but for the CSS-dw2 hooks we'd need to ask Sebastian (and hope for some free time on his part) or to dig in the old prototype code and try to figure it out. I'd much prefer Sebastian to advice us because he has the CSS model and dw2 design in his head, and can save us from a boat load of trouble. Note: with regard to this patch. Would you mind implement the toolbox-button/force-my-colors approach? Note2: if this kind of highlight is regarded as better than the former, I have no problems to commit. These are independent ideas. -- Cheers Jorge.-

Jan. 30, 2008

New table layout rocks!

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:29:48AM -0300, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 03:50:58PM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 02:39:17PM +0100, Diego . wrote: > > > > > After this effort maybe the "Rewrite of tables code" item on Plans > > > page ( http://www.dillo.org/Plans.html) can change from > > > yellow(prototype at least) to green (recently finished) > > > > Sadly this may a little too hasty. I am currently investigating bugs > > in the handling of ROWSPAN. Also, my impression is that performance > > has badly degraded for tables with many rows. > > Degraded since previous dillo2 or dillo1 version? > > AFAIS, the main bottleneck in dillo2 still is too many redraw requests. Yes, that's probabely true. However, I currently don't see any low hanging fruit in this area. dillo1 also redraws all the time. It is just not visible because it draws to some offscreen area first and then copies the result to the screen. And what's more important, drawing was cheaper without antialiased fonts... Johannes > > With regard to table rendering the code is mainly O(n), > so "badly degraded" would be a bug. > > Now, the code isn't yet optimized so there's plenty of space for > improving (in the O(n) realm). > > Please send the test cases and their detected problems. > > -- > Cheers > Jorge.- > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)dillo.org > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev

Jan. 30, 2008