March 2005 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev]Refresh patch for 0.8.4

by Roberto A. Foglietta

Brian Hechinger wrote: > On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 09:19:34AM +0100, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote: > >> For this reason I decide to have -r option instead put an option in a >>config file because packager could deliver its own default config with >>that option activated by default. It could be much more difficult for >>the packager to force me using that option by command line, instead. >> ;-) > > > this is why my plan was to have an rc file similar to the cookierc file so > you can have fine grained control over which sites are allowed to meta-refresh > and which ones aren't. IMNSHO, the best solution. ;) > > -brian Ok, I will as soon as possible, but not immediately because I'm working on something else now. I hope this will be enought to adopt my patch! ;-) Cheers, -- Roberto A. Foglietta Analista Programmatore GNU/Linux SAD Trasporto Locale S.p.a. Corso Italia 13/N 39100 BOLZANO (I) Tel. +39/0471-450.261 Fax +39/0471-450.253

March 31, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Dillo resolving problems

by Andreas Schweitzer

On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 12:46:24AM +0000, Liam J. Foy wrote: > browse on a regular basis cannot be viewed. I get the error: ERROR: No route to > host. However, I can ping and view these websites using another browser. An > example of a website I cannot view is: www.netbsd.org/ > > The system dillo is on currenly runs DragonFly BSD following the > Stable tag. Whats really strange is I can ping and view these websites using > other means =/ This is IPv6 related. www.netbsd.org resolves to a IPv6 address as well as to a IPv4 address. And for your system, the resolver system seems to prefer to return IPv6 (or dillo seems to prefer to take the IPv6). However, you don't have an IPv6 route/address/something. BTW, OpenBSD behaves similarly. Two solutions : - turn off routing of IPv6 entirely. I haven't tried that yet but I just recently read how to do it. It is a simple "route ....-inet6 ...." command. (I should look it up). - Make dillo look more carefully what addresses are returned. Maybe make dillo try both when the first does not work ? Cheers, Andreas -- Hamburger Sternwarte Universitaet Hamburg Gojenbergsweg 112 Tel. ++49 40 42891 4016 D-21029 Hamburg, Germany Fax. ++49 40 42891 4198

March 31, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?

by meka

On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:06:22 +0100 Jeremy Henty <jeremy(a)chaos.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:51:05PM +0200, meka wrote: > > > ... 1.2.x version [of FLTK] which is not supported any more by the > > fltk team (if I understood well). > > Pardon me, but I *think* you misunderstand. The FLTK web site > <URL:http://www.fltk.org/> lists version 1.1.6 as the *stable* > version. Both 1.2.x and 2.0.x appear to be works in progress. > > Cheers, > > Jeremy Henty > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)dillo.org > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev My mistake. I haven't seen instructions for downloading version 1.2 of fltk, so I assumed it is a dead project. Sorry. :o) -- I haven't even got up and the bug is here :o)

March 31, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Dillo resolving problems

by Ballance, Robert T

Patrick Shanahan <ptilopteri(a)gmail.com> said: > * Liam J. Foy <liamfoy(a)sepulcrum.org> [03-30-05 18:48]: > > On to more important topics, I have a strange problem which I > > dont understand. I believe it could possibly be dillo related. I am > > currently using Dillo 0.8.4 for your information. The problem is > > strange. A few websites I browse on a regular basis cannot be viewed. I > > get the error: ERROR: No route to host. However, I can ping and view > > these websites using another browser. An example of a website I cannot > > view is: www.netbsd.org/ > > > > The system dillo is on currenly runs DragonFly BSD following > > the Stable tag. Whats really strange is I can ping and view these > > websites using other means =/ > > You have problems with your system. I have forwarded to you directly a > screen capture of the site accessed with dillo .... I have a similar problem, that I haven't noticed with my system before. I'm running Dillo 0.8.4 on NetBSD 2.0-RELEASE built from pkgsrc, I'm pretty sure it's pkgsrc-2004Q4 Anyways, maybe it's a BSD specific problem? I can't get to a FreeBSD system right now, but if anybody else can check and see? -R. Tyler Ballance

March 31, 2005

[Dillo-dev]Dillo resolving problems

by Liam J. Foy

Hello Guys, First of all, congratulations on the excellent work achieved on dillo. Sadly I was only introduced to dillo recently, however I now use it every day for about 1-2 hours browsing CVSWEB. I love the way bookmarks are handled! On to more important topics, I have a strange problem which I dont understand. I believe it could possibly be dillo related. I am currently using Dillo 0.8.4 for your information. The problem is strange. A few websites I browse on a regular basis cannot be viewed. I get the error: ERROR: No route to host. However, I can ping and view these websites using another browser. An example of a website I cannot view is: www.netbsd.org/ The system dillo is on currenly runs DragonFly BSD following the Stable tag. Whats really strange is I can ping and view these websites using other means =/ Hope someone can shead some light on to my problem. If anymore information is needed, please ask! Regards, -- - Liam J. Foy DragonFly BSD Committer <liamfoy(a)sepulcrum.org> http://www.bsd-systems.co.uk

March 31, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Dillo resolving problems

by Jeremy Henty

Liam J. Foy wrote: > ... A few websites I browse on a regular basis cannot be viewed. I > get the error: ERROR: No route to host. However, I can ping and view > these websites using another browser. An example of a website I > cannot view is: www.netbsd.org/ I have no problems viewing http://www.netbsd.org/ with a stock dillo-0.8.4 [1] . Either something has happened between dillo-0.8.4 and the CVS tag you're tracking or the problem isn't just with dillo. Cheers, Jeremy Henty [1] Albeit patched to recognise the "'" entity, but that surely won't affect routing, will it?

March 31, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Dillo resolving problems

by Patrick Shanahan

* Liam J. Foy <liamfoy(a)sepulcrum.org> [03-30-05 18:48]: > On to more important topics, I have a strange problem which I > dont understand. I believe it could possibly be dillo related. I am > currently using Dillo 0.8.4 for your information. The problem is > strange. A few websites I browse on a regular basis cannot be viewed. I > get the error: ERROR: No route to host. However, I can ping and view > these websites using another browser. An example of a website I cannot > view is: www.netbsd.org/ > > The system dillo is on currenly runs DragonFly BSD following > the Stable tag. Whats really strange is I can ping and view these > websites using other means =/ You have problems with your system. I have forwarded to you directly a screen capture of the site accessed with dillo .... -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery

March 30, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?

by Jeremy Henty

On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:51:05PM +0200, meka wrote: > ... 1.2.x version [of FLTK] which is not supported any more by the > fltk team (if I understood well). Pardon me, but I *think* you misunderstand. The FLTK web site <URL:http://www.fltk.org/> lists version 1.1.6 as the *stable* version. Both 1.2.x and 2.0.x appear to be works in progress. Cheers, Jeremy Henty

March 30, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?

by meka

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:17:54 -0800 Kelson Vibber <kelson(a)pobox.com> wrote: > The current plan (unless it's been changed off-list) is to move to FLTK > instead, which should pick up things like Unicode support and a more > current code base. > > -- > Kelson Vibber > www.hyperborea.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)dillo.org > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev BTW, how is this plan going? I mean, I like fltk, but on the site says (or said, I haven't seen it recently) that it will use 1.2.x version which is not supported any more by the fltk team (if I understood well). Which version is is is going to be used? I vote for 2.0 (Unicode by default is there). -- I haven't even got up and the bug is here :o)

March 30, 2005

[Fwd: Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?]

by R. Tyler Ballance

oops, forgot to reply to the list :-! -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: R. Tyler Ballance <tyler(a)tamu.edu> To: Kelson Vibber <kelson(a)pobox.com> Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..? Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:16:56 -0600 On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 09:17 -0800, Kelson Vibber wrote: > R. Tyler Ballance wrote: > > Is there any reason Dillo is still building against the GTK+ 1.2 > > libraries as opposed to 2.0 ? > > People have done tests, and Dillo becomes much slower and much larger > under GTK2. > > The current plan (unless it's been changed off-list) is to move to FLTK > instead, which should pick up things like Unicode support and a more > current code base. > That's fine, but where (if any) is the code in CVS, i've worked with FLTK before, but only from a C++ perspective...is Dillo staying in C? By the way, jcid@, I heard you were at FOSDEM, and were staying with Mind.be, which one were you again, I was staying there with the MirOS/MirBSD hackers, I stayed up all night working on ports, so I probably saw you downstairs sometime hacking away (or listening to those comical Plan9 fellows talk ;)) Have you given thought to wxWidgets, or anything other graphics libs? (FLTK was kinda ugly the last time I used it, then again, GTK+ 1.2 isn't much pretty either) -R. Tyler Ballance

March 30, 2005