January 2013 - Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Yet another SGI compiler error...

by csoren＠isd.net

> > > > What's the invocation for checking out the latest commit > > from the repository? I didn't see it in the developer > > section of the website. I assume `hg clone dillo-3` > > grabs 3.0.2 as it existed on it's release date? > > > > "hg clone dillo3" will simply copy *your* repository, not > the one from hg.dillo.org. Cloning again the repository > from hg.dillo.org will indeed get you the newest changes: > > mv dillo3 dillo3_copy > hg clone http://hg.dillo.org/dillo dillo3 > cd dillo3 > > But this is faster: in the repository (after "cd dillo3"), > type > > hg pull http://hg.dillo.org/dillo > hg up > > to get the newest changes. "hg pull", without the URL, > should be sufficient in most cases. > > HTH. > > Sebastian > Okay thanks! Sorry for the newb questions; I've never used mercurial before... 0_o

Jan. 31, 2013

Yet another SGI compiler error...

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On Wed, Jan 30, Chris Sorenson wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 30, Chris Sorenson wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > > Try the latest commit. > > > > Sebastian > > > > What's the invocation for checking out the latest commit > from the repository? I didn't see it in the developer > section of the website. I assume `hg clone dillo-3` grabs > 3.0.2 as it existed on it's release date? "hg clone dillo3" will simply copy *your* repository, not the one from hg.dillo.org. Cloning again the repository from hg.dillo.org will indeed get you the newest changes: mv dillo3 dillo3_copy hg clone http://hg.dillo.org/dillo dillo3 cd dillo3 But this is faster: in the repository (after "cd dillo3"), type hg pull http://hg.dillo.org/dillo hg up to get the newest changes. "hg pull", without the URL, should be sufficient in most cases. HTH. Sebastian

Jan. 31, 2013

Yet another SGI compiler error...

by csoren＠isd.net

> On Wed, Jan 30, Chris Sorenson wrote: > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > Try the latest commit. > > Sebastian > What's the invocation for checking out the latest commit from the repository? I didn't see it in the developer section of the website. I assume `hg clone dillo-3` grabs 3.0.2 as it existed on it's release date?

Jan. 31, 2013

Yet another SGI compiler error...

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On Wed, Jan 30, Chris Sorenson wrote: > Hi, I've gotten 27 files to compile so far! But then this > happened: > > <pre> > -------------------------------------- > cc-1238 CC: ERROR File = table.cc, Line = 880 > The member "dw::core::Widget::extremes" is inaccessible. > > col,extremes->get(col).minWidth, > colExtremes->get(col).maxWidth); > ^ > > cc-1044 CC: ERROR File = table.cc, Line = 880 > The indicated expression must have pointer type. > > col,extremes->get(col).minWidth, > colExtremes->get(col).maxWidth) > -------------------------------------- > </pre> > > Thoughts? Try the latest commit. Sebastian

Jan. 30, 2013

Yet another SGI compiler error...

by csoren＠isd.net

Hi, I've gotten 27 files to compile so far! But then this happened: <pre> -------------------------------------- cc-1238 CC: ERROR File = table.cc, Line = 880 The member "dw::core::Widget::extremes" is inaccessible. col,extremes->get(col).minWidth, colExtremes->get(col).maxWidth); ^ cc-1044 CC: ERROR File = table.cc, Line = 880 The indicated expression must have pointer type. col,extremes->get(col).minWidth, colExtremes->get(col).maxWidth) -------------------------------------- </pre> Thoughts?

Jan. 30, 2013

CustChoice

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jorge wrote: > I also made FORM option menus activable with down key. I'm not > sure this is a good thing though. > > @corvid: as a keyboard user, please check whether this improves > things or not. It's quite easy to reverse if not (old behaviour: > scroll page. new: activate menu if option is focused). I'm not sure either.

Jan. 28, 2013

CustChoice

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 04:55:53PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Jorge wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:03:31PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > > > I was looking into why the search dialog would no longer let me tab to > > > the search engine list and press down arrow to switch between them... > > > It seems that, once Jorge added a CustChoice in fltkui.cc, the dialog code > > > started to use _that_ one and not its own. > > > > Funny how this also annoys me, while thinking it was one of your > > patches that changed the behaviour! ;-) > > > > Of course I'm not sure, and will review the issue, but *feel* > > happy about not being alone in longing for the old bahaviour. > > Perhaps we could have one CustChoice that everything uses, although I > don't know where we'd put it. OK, simple patch committed (avoiding compiler/linker confusion) Currently dw is mainly self contained so there's no easy place to put a custom class used by both. They're a bit different anyway, so it doesn't hurt. I also made FORM option menus activable with down key. I'm not sure this is a good thing though. @corvid: as a keyboard user, please check whether this improves things or not. It's quite easy to reverse if not (old behaviour: scroll page. new: activate menu if option is focused). -- Cheers Jorge.-

Jan. 28, 2013

CustChoice

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 04:55:53PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Jorge wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:03:31PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > > > I was looking into why the search dialog would no longer let me tab to > > > the search engine list and press down arrow to switch between them... > > > It seems that, once Jorge added a CustChoice in fltkui.cc, the dialog code > > > started to use _that_ one and not its own. > > > > Funny how this also annoys me, while thinking it was one of your > > patches that changed the behaviour! ;-) > > > > Of course I'm not sure, and will review the issue, but *feel* > > happy about not being alone in longing for the old bahaviour. > > Perhaps we could have one CustChoice that everything uses, although I > don't know where we'd put it. Yes, I'm also looking on that... Well, at least I have code to "fix" the dialog issue and also let FORM options also work as the search dialog. I'm yet to find out why the compiler/linker *seems* to be picking the wrong CustomChoice class. I focused on fixing the practical problem first. Patch soon. -- Cheers Jorge.-

Jan. 28, 2013

Another SGI compiler problem

by csoren＠isd.net

> > Any problem if you change > bool FltkToggleButtonResource<I>::FltkToggleButtonResource::isActivated () > to > bool FltkToggleButtonResource<I>::isActivated () > ? > Thanks that worked!

Jan. 27, 2013

CustChoice

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jorge wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 08:03:31PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > I was looking into why the search dialog would no longer let me tab to > > the search engine list and press down arrow to switch between them... > > It seems that, once Jorge added a CustChoice in fltkui.cc, the dialog code > > started to use _that_ one and not its own. > > Funny how this also annoys me, while thinking it was one of your > patches that changed the behaviour! ;-) > > Of course I'm not sure, and will review the issue, but *feel* > happy about not being alone in longing for the old bahaviour. Perhaps we could have one CustChoice that everything uses, although I don't know where we'd put it.

Jan. 26, 2013