- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

release candidate 1

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:02:27PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > Johannes, Corvid, > > I'll be out of town this weekend, please attend any > problem on the repo. as it's rc1. The idea is to make > a release next week. > > On the pending things that you may like to advance: > - write the dillo-2.1 about:splash page A splash page was committed. Please comment or send suggestions/patches/ideas/kudos :) We're almost there... -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 15, 2009

release candidate 1

by jcid＠dillo.org

Johannes, Corvid, I'll be out of town this weekend, please attend any problem on the repo. as it's rc1. The idea is to make a release next week. On the pending things that you may like to advance: - write the dillo-2.1 about:splash page - check making packages - polish FAQ and help text -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 13, 2009

memory use

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 02:54:52PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Jorge wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:14:51AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > Interesting that Firefox has a greater VSZ without images. > > > I don't think I noticed that earlier. > > > > Oh, I didn't notice too. > > Is this result reproducible in your computer? > > I just tried with http://fltk.org/shots.php > which is easier to deal with. > > dillo > 8812 4668 -g, no optimization > 10940 5852 opening page > 14844 9732 retrieving images > > I noticed that opening the page had to pull in fonts, libXcursor, libXcompat, > libnss*, libresolv, and some other things I've already forgotten. > > firefox 2.0.0.20 > 54280 21952 to start > 57108 23916 to show the page (only had to pull in fonts) > 55996 25120 with images > 49968 25124 after waiting a little while without having touched anything. > > firefox 2.0.0.20 second try because it occurred to me that the dialog box > for preferences for turning on image loading is very heavyweight > 47084 21872 to start (seven megs less this time??) > 50804 23716 to show page > 51764 24812 pref dialog up > 49816 25052 with images > 47768 25048 after waiting a while > afaik firefox stores pixmaps on the server side, so you probabely need to keep an eye on Xorg memory usage too. Cheers, Johannes

June 13, 2009

memory use

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jorge wrote: > On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:14:51AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Interesting that Firefox has a greater VSZ without images. > > I don't think I noticed that earlier. > > Oh, I didn't notice too. > Is this result reproducible in your computer? I just tried with http://fltk.org/shots.php which is easier to deal with. dillo 8812 4668 -g, no optimization 10940 5852 opening page 14844 9732 retrieving images I noticed that opening the page had to pull in fonts, libXcursor, libXcompat, libnss*, libresolv, and some other things I've already forgotten. firefox 2.0.0.20 54280 21952 to start 57108 23916 to show the page (only had to pull in fonts) 55996 25120 with images 49968 25124 after waiting a little while without having touched anything. firefox 2.0.0.20 second try because it occurred to me that the dialog box for preferences for turning on image loading is very heavyweight 47084 21872 to start (seven megs less this time??) 50804 23716 to show page 51764 24812 pref dialog up 49816 25052 with images 47768 25048 after waiting a while

June 13, 2009

memory use

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, Jun 13, 2009 at 01:14:51AM +0000, corvid wrote: > Interesting that Firefox has a greater VSZ without images. > I don't think I noticed that earlier. Oh, I didn't notice too. Is this result reproducible in your computer? -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 13, 2009

memory use

by jcid＠dillo.org

Hi, After a long time, a memory usage page was added! There's a link from the first bullet point of dillo.org, and another form the 9years page. -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 13, 2009

[patch] change font size on the fly

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:47:10PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 03:32:35PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Johannes wrote: > > > attached patch allows to change the font size form the tools menu. > > > I find this quite handy sometimes. What do you think? > > As is, it's handy for developers, although it may be confusing > for users. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. When it doesn't > it looks as if nothing happened, but when going to another page, > the font factor surprises with a change. > > e.g. http://www.linuxpackages.net > > (click larger fonts a few times, then go back). That happens when websites specify fixed font sizes (e.g. 12pt). In that case font_factor does not change it. It only changes font sizes like "small", "medium" ... and font sizes relatively defined to the base font. Here is a related discussion: http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=ForceFontSize > > > > No objections here. > > (although I've been content since increasing font_min_size a bit) > > As is now, I'd go for a plain explanation of font_min_size and > font_factor in the FAQ. Ok. > > I'd prefer to polish the patch until is behaves "as expected" > in all cases, but that may involve keeping a per page font_factor. > It may take some time... Hm, let's check what other browsers do. Cheers, Johannes

June 12, 2009

[patch] change font size on the fly

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 03:32:35PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Johannes wrote: > > attached patch allows to change the font size form the tools menu. > > I find this quite handy sometimes. What do you think? As is, it's handy for developers, although it may be confusing for users. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. When it doesn't it looks as if nothing happened, but when going to another page, the font factor surprises with a change. e.g. http://www.linuxpackages.net (click larger fonts a few times, then go back). > No objections here. > (although I've been content since increasing font_min_size a bit) As is now, I'd go for a plain explanation of font_min_size and font_factor in the FAQ. I'd prefer to polish the patch until is behaves "as expected" in all cases, but that may involve keeping a per page font_factor. It may take some time... -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 12, 2009

[patch] change font size on the fly

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Johannes wrote: > attached patch allows to change the font size form the tools menu. > I find this quite handy sometimes. What do you think? No objections here. (although I've been content since increasing font_min_size a bit)

June 11, 2009

[patch] change font size on the fly

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

Hi, attached patch allows to change the font size form the tools menu. I find this quite handy sometimes. What do you think? Cheers, Johannes

June 11, 2009