- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

patch: configure rm libpng version tests

by weigelt＠metux.de

* Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg.sonnenberger(a)web.de> schrieb: > Because most of the original libpng-config is older than the pkgconfig > support in libpng :) Be prepared that it gets dropped some day. (some distros maybe already removed it already). And keep in mind that these *-config scripts are quite crosscompile-unfriedly. > Pretty much. If you don't have it, you can still override the automatic > detection via PNG_CFLAGS / PNG_LIBS or so. Which requires another special tweak in the distro's package build rules/descriptors - exactly what packagers do not like. cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt(a)metux.de mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Jan. 30, 2011

Final release of FLTK 2.0 Dillo

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 08:57:33PM +0000, corvid wrote: > T wrote: > > I wonder what a projected timeline for the 1.3 release will be.... No timeline yet (we'd need some effort estimation for it) > I suppose a safe answer is a) when it's ready, and b) the value will be a > function of the degree of community involvement. > > How many things are even still decently broken? Let's see... > - the UI needs attention > - the user/pass dialog, and choice5 dialog > - a couple of scrollbar infelicities > - complexButton drawing > - some event focus stuff that we haven't untangled yet. Using this as an "effort estimation", I'd say if one developer works full time one week on it, most of it would be done. No big deal. (FWIW, I wrote dillo's GTK1 and FLTK2 UI). BTW, the key point in dillo development since a long time, is manpower. When there're developers working on something, it advances very well. For the same reason, I want to thank corvid for all the effort he has put on the 1.3 branch. When I have some time I'll look into the UI. -- Cheers Jorge.-

Jan. 30, 2011

Final release of FLTK 2.0 Dillo

by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com

> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 06:42:00PM -0500, Benjamin Johnson wrote: >On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 18:26:32 -0500, Roger <rogerx.oss(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> ??? But all the other browsers are bloating pieces of cr*p though! > >Yes, Lynx is really letting itself go these days... Sorry. Forgot my other most used browser, aside from Dillo, is ELinks. Guess I was really poking at the other GUI browsers! -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Jan. 30, 2011

patch: configure rm libpng version tests

by joerg.sonnenberger＠web.de

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 08:38:50PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Enrico wrote: > > * corvid <corvid(a)lavabit.com> schrieb: > > > + PNG_CONFIG=`which libpng-config` > > > fi > > > > Why not just using pkg-config ? > > (which would be _much_ more distmaintainer/packager-friendly) Because most of the original libpng-config is older than the pkgconfig support in libpng :) > > > > PKG_CHECK_MODULE([...]) > > Is pkg-config ubiquitous where we aren't adding to dependencies too much? Pretty much. If you don't have it, you can still override the automatic detection via PNG_CFLAGS / PNG_LIBS or so. Joerg

Jan. 30, 2011

Final release of FLTK 2.0 Dillo

by obeythepenguin＠gmail.com

On Sat, 29 Jan 2011 18:26:32 -0500, Roger <rogerx.oss(a)gmail.com> wrote: > ??? But all the other browsers are bloating pieces of cr*p though! Yes, Lynx is really letting itself go these days...

Jan. 30, 2011

Final release of FLTK 2.0 Dillo

by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com

> On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 08:57:33PM +0000, corvid wrote: >T wrote: >> I wonder what a projected timeline for the 1.3 release will be.... > >I suppose a safe answer is a) when it's ready, and b) the value will be a >function of the degree of community involvement. >How many things are even still decently broken? Let's see... >- the UI needs attention >- the user/pass dialog, and choice5 dialog >- a couple of scrollbar infelicities >- complexButton drawing >- some event focus stuff that we haven't untangled yet. I see the glitch or two within the UI, along with scrollbar lag. >I'm not sure that I even have any need for ordinary dillo anymore. >I still run it by accident sometimes, but... ??? But all the other browsers are bloating pieces of cr*p though! What's even funnier, I think the major news websites just tripled the amount of scripts on their websites within the past month! Pretty soon, we're going to need a 2Ghz CPU just to Google! -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Jan. 30, 2011

Final release of FLTK 2.0 Dillo

by corvid＠lavabit.com

T wrote: > I wonder what a projected timeline for the 1.3 release will be.... I suppose a safe answer is a) when it's ready, and b) the value will be a function of the degree of community involvement. How many things are even still decently broken? Let's see... - the UI needs attention - the user/pass dialog, and choice5 dialog - a couple of scrollbar infelicities - complexButton drawing - some event focus stuff that we haven't untangled yet. I'm not sure that I even have any need for ordinary dillo anymore. I still run it by accident sometimes, but...

Jan. 29, 2011

patch: configure rm libpng version tests

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Enrico wrote: > * corvid <corvid(a)lavabit.com> schrieb: > > + PNG_CONFIG=`which libpng-config` > > fi > > Why not just using pkg-config ? > (which would be _much_ more distmaintainer/packager-friendly) > > PKG_CHECK_MODULE([...]) Is pkg-config ubiquitous where we aren't adding to dependencies too much? I guess I like to imagine dillo in the hands of someone like me who is not a maintainer/packager and might have weird/old/underpowered hardware and have limited patience for finding/downloading/compiling even more stuff in order to find out whether I even like dillo.

Jan. 29, 2011

patch: configure rm libpng version tests

by weigelt＠metux.de

* corvid <corvid(a)lavabit.com> schrieb: > + PNG_CONFIG=`which libpng-config` > fi Why not just using pkg-config ? (which would be _much_ more distmaintainer/packager-friendly) PKG_CHECK_MODULE([...]) cu -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt(a)metux.de mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Jan. 29, 2011

Final release of FLTK 2.0 Dillo

by itsme_410＠yahoo.com

I wonder what a projected timeline for the 1.3 release will be.... T --- On Tue, 1/25/11, Alexander Voigt <Hole.destructor(a)gmx.de> wrote: > From: Alexander Voigt <Hole.destructor(a)gmx.de> > Subject: [Dillo-dev] Final release of FLTK 2.0 Dillo > To: "Dillo Mailinglist" <dillo-dev(a)dillo.org> > Date: Tuesday, January 25, 2011, 3:21 AM > Dear Dillo developers, > > since you started porting Dillo to FLTK 1.3, I wonder if > you plan to > do a last release of the current FLTK 2.0 Dillo?? > (This would seem > reasonable to me, since this version works pretty well and > some of us > can't wait so long for the next release. :) > > Many thanks in advance, > Alexander Voigt > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)dillo.org > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev >

Jan. 29, 2011