- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

No subject

by bogus＠does.not.exist.com

cache, or as if there were a stale persistent dpi process still present. At this point, I'll gander it was something with the dpi processes not cleanly exiting due to the kill signal. (I doubt a *dpi* process was hidden from proc.) -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Dec. 7, 2011

Dillo fails on http://www.google.com/m/. Browser Agent?

by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com

I find Dillo failing on the following simple site, which Elinks and other mobile browsers view just fine: http://www.google.com/m/ -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Dec. 7, 2011

tooltip bug

by corvid＠lavabit.com

I just noticed some odd behaviour with <img src=img title="img title" border=1 width=50 height=50><br> <a href=link title="link title">text</a> If I put the cursor over the link and then, when I expect the tooltip to pop up, move quickly up into the image, first the link's tooltip pops up for an instant -- but says "img title" -- and then the image's tooltip pops up -- but says "link title".

Dec. 6, 2011

dillo-3.0.2 released

by corvid＠lavabit.com

It's official! http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-3.0.2.tar.bz2 http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-3.0.2.tar.bz2.asc And, for good measure, the sha1sum is still... 1d1258ee7d18c8ca0eabaf100f2f611c6be03f87 as it was for the rc. Thanks everyone!

Dec. 5, 2011

IPv6 and HTTPS (Re: release candidate for dillo-3.0.2)

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 11:05:15AM -0500, Benjamin Johnson wrote: > Johannes wrote: > > >I doubt it's worth making the current experimental HTTPS plugin > >IPv6 ready. > >We will need a more robust HTTPS solution at some point. > > Cheers, > >Johannes > > Why not just reuse the existing HTTP code? > > *cough* > > http://dillo-win32.sourceforge.net/patches/07-dfcntl.diff > http://dillo-win32.sourceforge.net/patches/08-dsock.diff > http://dillo-win32.sourceforge.net/patches/17-https.diff > > Just add some warning dialogs and you've got everything the plugin > offers, plus greater efficiency, code reuse, IPv6, etc. > > (Not to mention, it's thoroughly tested and quite stable on Linux, > BSD, that other OS with 99% market share, etc. I use it myself > every day.) > > Anyway, all my code's still there if you're interested. Thanks for the offer. Currently the patches don't seem to apply cleanly and they also mix in WIN32 compatibility code. So integration work is needed and also an in depth review of the certificate handling. Cheers, Johannes

Dec. 4, 2011

IPv6 and HTTPS (Re: release candidate for dillo-3.0.2)

by obeythepenguin＠gmail.com

Johannes wrote: > I doubt it's worth making the current experimental HTTPS plugin > IPv6 ready. > We will need a more robust HTTPS solution at some point. > Cheers, > Johannes Why not just reuse the existing HTTP code? *cough* http://dillo-win32.sourceforge.net/patches/07-dfcntl.diff http://dillo-win32.sourceforge.net/patches/08-dsock.diff http://dillo-win32.sourceforge.net/patches/17-https.diff Just add some warning dialogs and you've got everything the plugin offers, plus greater efficiency, code reuse, IPv6, etc. (Not to mention, it's thoroughly tested and quite stable on Linux, BSD, that other OS with 99% market share, etc. I use it myself every day.) Anyway, all my code's still there if you're interested. Cheers, ~Benjamin

Dec. 4, 2011

IPv6 and HTTPS (Re: release candidate for dillo-3.0.2)

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 10:41:50PM +0100, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 09:23:41PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Axel wrote: > > > IPv6 and HTTPS seem both to work independently, but HTTPS over IPv6 > > > does not work. An example host would be the IPv6-only reachable server > > > at https://jumper.deuxchevaux.org/. (Submitted to the bug database as > > > bug #1023.) > > > > > > The same host with just HTTP (http://jumper.deuxchevaux.org/) works > > > fine as well as does a randomly chosen (IPv4 :-) HTTPS website. > > > > > > OTOH with 3.0.1 it looks very similar and doesn't work either with > > > IPv6 + HTTPS, so I think it's "just" a bug in Dillo, but not a > > > regression in 3.0.2. :-) > > > > Is anyone in a sufficiently IPv6-ed environment that they can dig into > > this at some point? > > I doubt it's worth making the current experimental HTTPS plugin > IPv6 ready. > We will need a more robust HTTPS solution at some point. Ditto. -- Cheers Jorge.-

Dec. 4, 2011

IPv6 and HTTPS (Re: release candidate for dillo-3.0.2)

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 09:23:41PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Axel wrote: > > IPv6 and HTTPS seem both to work independently, but HTTPS over IPv6 > > does not work. An example host would be the IPv6-only reachable server > > at https://jumper.deuxchevaux.org/. (Submitted to the bug database as > > bug #1023.) > > > > The same host with just HTTP (http://jumper.deuxchevaux.org/) works > > fine as well as does a randomly chosen (IPv4 :-) HTTPS website. > > > > OTOH with 3.0.1 it looks very similar and doesn't work either with > > IPv6 + HTTPS, so I think it's "just" a bug in Dillo, but not a > > regression in 3.0.2. :-) > > Is anyone in a sufficiently IPv6-ed environment that they can dig into > this at some point? I doubt it's worth making the current experimental HTTPS plugin IPv6 ready. We will need a more robust HTTPS solution at some point. Cheers, Johannes

Dec. 3, 2011

IPv6 and HTTPS (Re: release candidate for dillo-3.0.2)

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Axel wrote: > IPv6 and HTTPS seem both to work independently, but HTTPS over IPv6 > does not work. An example host would be the IPv6-only reachable server > at https://jumper.deuxchevaux.org/. (Submitted to the bug database as > bug #1023.) > > The same host with just HTTP (http://jumper.deuxchevaux.org/) works > fine as well as does a randomly chosen (IPv4 :-) HTTPS website. > > OTOH with 3.0.1 it looks very similar and doesn't work either with > IPv6 + HTTPS, so I think it's "just" a bug in Dillo, but not a > regression in 3.0.2. :-) Is anyone in a sufficiently IPv6-ed environment that they can dig into this at some point? > Otherwise 3.0.2 RC1 looks fine for me. :-) Thanks :)

Dec. 3, 2011

Dillo temporary directory

by obeythepenguin＠gmail.com

Jorge wrote: > On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 09:11:48AM +0100, Georg Potthast wrote: > > I observe that Dillo changes the current directory to "\tmp" when > > running. Why does it do that and what files shall be written into > > this directory? > No files, Dillo tries to work from an unmounted directory. > -- Cheers > Jorge.- But *why* does Dillo work from an unmounted directory? What advantage does this provide, especially if Dillo does not write any files there? (As a side note, /tmp _is_ mounted on many systems, like OpenBSD.) Cheers, ~Benjamin

Dec. 3, 2011