- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

gtk-list@gnome.org

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Hi, Is anyone here member of "gtk-list(a)gnome.org"? I sent an email some days ago there and it is being "held" for aproval because I'm not a member. If someone has a membership there please let me know to forward my message through him. Thanks Jorge.-

June 12, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] New program icons (not toolbars)

by Melvin Hadasht

> Just look at the new stuff at: http://www.dillo.org/Icons/ Gorgeous: (web1913) Gorgeous \Gor"geous\, a. [OF. gorgias beautiful, glorious, vain, luxurious; cf. OF. gorgias ruff, neck handkerchief, and F. gorge throat, and se pengorger to assume airs. Cf. Gorge, n.] Imposing through splendid or various colors; showy; fine; magnificent. The new icon set is all that.

June 11, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] New program icons (not toolbars)

by Chris Palmer

Jorge Arellano Cid writes: > Just look at the new stuff at: http://www.dillo.org/Icons/ Nice!

June 11, 2003

New program icons (not toolbars)

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Hy Guys! Just look at the new stuff at: http://www.dillo.org/Icons/ Enjoy Jorge.- PS: Poll is over, we all agreed on making JG's icons the default!!!

June 11, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] IFRAME element stub

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Nikita, > Hi all Dillo developers ! > > There is a very small patch to support IFRAME HTML element. It does nothing > except handling IFRAME via FRAME handler so special IFAME attributes > (width and height) are not handled but this patch is suitable for current > temporary solution (as we do not have real frame support for now). Done! Cheers Jorge.-

June 11, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Strange condition in cache.c old code

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Nikita, > Hello old Dillo developers ! Hi! > Explain me please what is 1024 in the following code for. I read HTML and > HTTP/1.1 (rfc2616) specifications but didn't find an answer. FYI: Dillo uses HTTP/1.0. > I think this > condition must be wiped out because some servers (linux.org.ru for example) > give too long responses. > > [...] > > /* > * Process redirections (HTTP 30x answers) > * (This is a work in progress --not finished yet) > */ > int Cache_redirect(CacheData_t *entry, int Flags, BrowserWindow *bw) > { > if ( ((entry->Flags & CA_Redirect) && entry->Location) && > ((entry->Flags & CA_ForceRedirect) || !entry->ValidSize || > entry->ValidSize < 1024 ) ) { IIRC this is an heuristical boundary. Some servers don't send entity content within an http redirection (Correct behaviour IMHO). Some send a short default message as entity content (something so redundant as "This page is being redirected"), and some others send a full page that can be anything! The "1024" somehow decides this: < 1024: Short redirection message. > 1024: Don't know what is this large page! I also have a vague memory in my mind about how the http redirection data stream is (or isn't) cut in order to make the redirection. The "1024" threshold may "solve" this somehow. This is where you need to start investigating. HTH Jorge.-

June 11, 2003

Strange condition in cache.c old code

by Nikita V. Borodikhin

Hello old Dillo developers ! Explain me please what is 1024 in the following code for. I read HTML and HTTP/1.1 (rfc2616) specifications but didn't find an answer. I think this condition must be wiped out because some servers (linux.org.ru for example) give too long responses. Code from cache.c revision 1.2, Tue Aug 29 00:36:27 2000 UTC, 2 years, 9 months ago by shaleh: /* * Process redirections (HTTP 30x answers) * (This is a work in progress --not finished yet) */ int Cache_redirect(CacheData_t *entry, int Flags, BrowserWindow *bw) { if ( ((entry->Flags & CA_Redirect) && entry->Location) && ((entry->Flags & CA_ForceRedirect) || !entry->ValidSize || entry->ValidSize < 1024 ) ) { Yours, Nikita

June 11, 2003

Re: IFRAME element stub

by Nikita V. Borodikhin

On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:30:32 +1000 TheStar <thestar(a)tpg.com.au> wrote: > > There is a very small patch to support IFRAME HTML element. It does > > nothing except handling IFRAME via FRAME handler so special IFAME > > attributes(width and height) are not handled but this patch is > > suitable for current temporary solution (as we do not have real > > frame support for now). > > This implies that Dillo can now handle frames (perhaps by re-rendering > to tables), on at least one developer's computer - Correct? No, not on my computer. Dillo (CVS version and all releases) cannot handle frames as needed. It currently follows HTML specification in handling frames by browsers which do not have an ability to show them so it gives you only links to frames. This patch only adds ability to draw link to IFRAME source. Some work is in progress which may implement frames (see last week postings about tabbed version) but it is not currenly done. Yours, Nikita

June 11, 2003

IFRAME element stub

by Nikita V. Borodikhin

Hi all Dillo developers ! There is a very small patch to support IFRAME HTML element. It does nothing except handling IFRAME via FRAME handler so special IFAME attributes (width and height) are not handled but this patch is suitable for current temporary solution (as we do not have real frame support for now). Your, Nikita diff -pruN dillo/src/html.c dillo-iframe/src/html.c --- dillo/src/html.c 2003-06-06 14:13:00.000000000 +0700 +++ dillo-iframe/src/html.c 2003-06-11 16:50:54.000000000 +0700 @@ -3795,6 +3795,7 @@ static const TagInfo Tags[] = { {"hr", Html_tag_open_hr, Html_tag_close_nop}, /* html */ {"i", Html_tag_open_i, Html_tag_close_default}, + {"iframe", Html_tag_open_frame, Html_tag_close_nop}, {"img", Html_tag_open_img, Html_tag_close_nop}, {"input", Html_tag_open_input, Html_tag_close_nop}, /* ins */

June 11, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] the #anchor links not going to history

by Frank Gevaerts

On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:03:05PM +0200, Jan Stary wrote: > Hello, > > there seems to be the following problem with the history of browsing: > > If first.html contains a link <a href="second.html">, then clicking on it > gets you to second.html - OK. If second.html contains a link <a > href=#"anchor"> pointing to a place in second.html, then clicking on the > link gets you to #anchor - OK. But then, when you press [,] to go back, > you get back to first.thml. > > Definitely, you want [,] to get you back to the beginning of second.html. > > It looks like the #anchor links don't go into the 'stack of previous > places'. I don't mean that second.html#anchor should be remembered as a > unique record in browser history (e.g. for future runs, after dillo > supports it), but definitely it's a step 'forward from second.html', > so going 'back' should go to second.html, not first.html. I have a patch for 0.6.6 that does this. I don't know if it still applies, but I'm appending it here. Note that I'm not sure this is/was the right way to do it. Frank diff -ur dillo-0.6.6/src/history.c dillo-0.6.6.fg/src/history.c --- dillo-0.6.6/src/history.c 2002-04-10 02:53:58.000000000 +0200 +++ dillo-0.6.6.fg/src/history.c 2002-08-16 17:58:55.000000000 +0200 @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ gint i, idx; for (i = 0; i < history_size; ++i) - if (a_Url_cmp(history[i].url, url) == 0) + if (a_Url_cmp(history[i].url, url) == 0 && URL_STRCAMP_EQ(history[i].url->fragment,url->fragment)) return i; idx = history_size; diff -ur dillo-0.6.6/src/nav.c dillo-0.6.6.fg/src/nav.c --- dillo-0.6.6/src/nav.c 2002-04-10 03:10:16.000000000 +0200 +++ dillo-0.6.6.fg/src/nav.c 2002-08-16 20:34:52.000000000 +0200 @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ MustLoad = ForceReload || !old_url; if (old_url){ MustLoad |= a_Url_cmp(old_url, url); - MustLoad |= strcmp(URL_STR(old_url), a_Interface_get_location_text(bw)); + MustLoad |= strcmp(URL_STR_NOANCHOR(old_url), a_Interface_get_location_text(bw)); } if ( MustLoad ) { @@ -195,9 +195,19 @@ a_Interface_set_cursor(bw, GDK_LEFT_PTR); } - /* Jump to #anchor position */ + /* Push on stack and jump to #anchor position */ if (URL_FRAGMENT_(url)) { - /* todo: push on stack */ + gint idx; + DilloUrl *hist_url=a_Url_dup(url); + + /* unset E2EReload before adding this url to history */ + a_Url_set_flags(hist_url, URL_FLAGS(hist_url) & ~URL_E2EReload); + idx = a_History_add_url(hist_url); + Nav_stack_add(bw, idx); + Nav_stack_clean(bw); + a_Interface_set_button_sens(bw); + a_Url_free(hist_url); + a_Dw_gtk_scrolled_window_set_anchor( GTK_DW_SCROLLED_WINDOW(bw->docwin), URL_FRAGMENT_(url)); } diff -ur dillo-0.6.6/src/url.c dillo-0.6.6.fg/src/url.c --- dillo-0.6.6/src/url.c 2002-04-10 03:10:28.000000000 +0200 +++ dillo-0.6.6.fg/src/url.c 2002-08-16 20:20:59.000000000 +0200 @@ -56,19 +56,47 @@ if (!url->url_string) { url->url_string = g_string_sized_new(60); - g_string_sprintf( - url->url_string, "%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s", - url->scheme ? url->scheme : "", - url->scheme ? ":" : "", - url->authority ? "//" : "", - url->authority ? url->authority : "", - (url->path && url->path[0] != '/' && url->authority) ? "/" : "", - url->path ? url->path : "", - url->query ? "?" : "", - url->query ? url->query : "", - url->fragment ? "#" : "", - url->fragment ? url->fragment : ""); } + g_string_sprintf( + url->url_string, "%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s", + url->scheme ? url->scheme : "", + url->scheme ? ":" : "", + url->authority ? "//" : "", + url->authority ? url->authority : "", + (url->path && url->path[0] != '/' && url->authority) ? "/" : "", + url->path ? url->path : "", + url->query ? "?" : "", + url->query ? url->query : "", + url->fragment ? "#" : "", + url->fragment ? url->fragment : ""); + + return url->url_string->str; +} + +/* + * Return the url as a string, without the anchor part. + * (initializing 'url_string' camp if necessary) + */ +gchar *a_Url_str_noanchor(const DilloUrl *u) +{ + /* Internal url handling IS transparent to the caller */ + DilloUrl *url = (DilloUrl *) u; + + g_return_val_if_fail (url != NULL, NULL); + + if (!url->url_string) { + url->url_string = g_string_sized_new(60); + } + g_string_sprintf( + url->url_string, "%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s", + url->scheme ? url->scheme : "", + url->scheme ? ":" : "", + url->authority ? "//" : "", + url->authority ? url->authority : "", + (url->path && url->path[0] != '/' && url->authority) ? "/" : "", + url->path ? url->path : "", + url->query ? "?" : "", + url->query ? url->query : ""); return url->url_string->str; } diff -ur dillo-0.6.6/src/url.h dillo-0.6.6.fg/src/url.h --- dillo-0.6.6/src/url.h 2002-04-10 03:05:43.000000000 +0200 +++ dillo-0.6.6.fg/src/url.h 2002-08-16 20:25:02.000000000 +0200 @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ #define URL_ALT_(u) u->alt #define URL_POS_(u) u->scrolling_position #define URL_STR_(u) a_Url_str(u) +#define URL_STR_NOANCHOR_(u) a_Url_str_noanchor(u) /* * Access methods that always return a string: @@ -75,6 +76,7 @@ #define URL_ALT(u) NPTR2STR(URL_ALT_(u)) #define URL_POS(u) URL_POS_(u) #define URL_STR(u) NPTR2STR(URL_STR_(u)) +#define URL_STR_NOANCHOR(u) NPTR2STR(URL_STR_NOANCHOR_(u)) @@ -117,6 +119,7 @@ gint flags, gint pos); void a_Url_free(DilloUrl *u); gchar *a_Url_str(const DilloUrl *url); +gchar *a_Url_str_noanchor(const DilloUrl *url); const gchar *a_Url_hostname(const DilloUrl *u); DilloUrl* a_Url_dup(const DilloUrl *u); gint a_Url_cmp(const DilloUrl* A, const DilloUrl* B);

June 10, 2003