- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev]Refresh patch for 0.8.4

by Patrick Shanahan

* higuita <higuita7(a)yahoo.co.uk> [01-30-05 03:16]: > uuhmm?! > are you sure? arent you thinking in the cookies? > i have https in every instance i try, the only problem > with https is the "always ask for the certificate" problem maybe ?? -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/photos

Jan. 30, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Refresh patch for 0.8.4

by higuita

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 12:30:54 -0500, Patrick Shanahan <ptilopteri(a)gmail.com> wrote: > before complying. I use it exclusively. The only problem I have with > it is it's only available to *one* screen/instance at a time :^(. uuhmm?! are you sure? arent you thinking in the cookies? i have https in every instance i try, the only problem with https is the "always ask for the certificate" problem higuita -- Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country. -- Hermann Goering, Nazi and war criminal, 1883-1946

Jan. 30, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Refresh patch for 0.8.4

by Patrick Shanahan

* Brian Hechinger <wonko(a)4amlunch.net> [01-29-05 11:41]: > > through the use of dillo plug-ins, i think we should be fully capable of > keeping the core dillo small and light, while easily allowing the ability > to add features that some people need without increasing the core bloat. > > https is a perfect example of this for one. https is already available by merely commenting out one line of code before complying. I use it exclusively. The only problem I have with it is it's only available to *one* screen/instance at a time :^(. -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/photos

Jan. 29, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Refresh patch for 0.8.4

by Brian Hechinger

On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 01:46:13PM +0000, robert w hall wrote: > In message <7ff5668305012822047c7c59a5(a)mail.gmail.com>, Kelly Price > <strredwolf(a)gmail.com> writes > >Heya. New here. Glad someone's working on Dillo. Hope it comes > >full-featured like Firefox is with less than half the bloat! > > well some of us want NO bloat, and would err on the side of something > less than fully-featured to ensure that. > > If others really require a firefox-competitor, perhaps we are heading > for a dillo-lite... through the use of dillo plug-ins, i think we should be fully capable of keeping the core dillo small and light, while easily allowing the ability to add features that some people need without increasing the core bloat. https is a perfect example of this for one. -brian -- "Now you know why I got the everliving hell OUT of Windows administration. Knowing it doesn't make it any easier. It's just broken-as-designed."

Jan. 29, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Refresh patch for 0.8.4

by robert w hall

In message <7ff5668305012822047c7c59a5(a)mail.gmail.com>, Kelly Price <strredwolf(a)gmail.com> writes >Heya. New here. Glad someone's working on Dillo. Hope it comes >full-featured like Firefox is with less than half the bloat! well some of us want NO bloat, and would err on the side of something less than fully-featured to ensure that. If others really require a firefox-competitor, perhaps we are heading for a dillo-lite... -- robert w hall

Jan. 29, 2005

[Dillo-dev]Refresh patch for 0.8.4

by Kelly Price

Heya. New here. Glad someone's working on Dillo. Hope it comes full-featured like Firefox is with less than half the bloat! I'm attaching a fixed patch for 0.8.4 that allows meta-http refreshes. This is quite common with web chats (including Tag-Board). I've test-compiled and ran it, and so far so good. The next thing we'll need is the frames/iframes code now! -- Kelly "STrRedWolf" Price http://strredwolf.furrynet.com

Jan. 29, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]RPM status

by robert w hall

In article <41EFECA9.1050804(a)pobox.com>, Kelson Vibber <kelson(a)pobox.com> writes > >I'm thinking of dropping some of the older releases next time, just to >simplify things. > In a similar move to simplification, I suggest I _only_ build an ssl- enabled rpm for the ps2 next time (the code has been out for long enough to come out of alpha, despite the certificates irritation, and most ps2-users need the https function.) Bob -- robert w hall

Jan. 20, 2005

[Dillo-dev]RPM status

by Kelson Vibber

Over the weekend I managed to get User-Mode Linux running again (under an old Red Hat 7.3 partition that I hadn't gotten around to deleting), so I was able to fill in RPMs for the rest of the releases I had used for Dillo 0.8.3. I also installed Mandrake 10.1, and was able to add an RPM for that release. I installed SuSE 9.2, though the combination of slow hardware, average DSL, slow mirror, the occasional missing file on the mirror and little free time to work with meant that it took several days to get a working install. Last night I finally built Dillo on it, but there's a font problem. When I get a chance I'll try installing some other GTK-1.2 apps and see if it's just a system config problem, and if it is, I'll post the RPM. At that point I'll have RPMs for current releases of Fedora Core, Mandrake, and SuSE, and a number of older releases. I'm thinking of dropping some of the older releases next time, just to simplify things. -- Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

Jan. 20, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Patch review: Frank de Lange patch (20031124)

by Roberto A. Foglietta

Bastiaan Jacques wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > > > I am dissecting and reviewing Frank de Lange's 14,000 line patch that > was rejected by the core dillo developers due to its size. I will email > the list from time to time to gather input as to whether a particular > portion of the patch is useful or not, beginning with the patch a little > further down this message. Is this patch 0.8.4 ready? Is this patch available? May try it and check the code it modified? Cheers, -- Roberto A. Foglietta Analista Programmatore GNU/Linux SAD Trasporto Locale S.p.a. Corso Italia 13/N 39100 BOLZANO (I) Tel. +39/0471-450.261 Fax +39/0471-450.253

Jan. 20, 2005

[Dillo-dev]Patch review: Frank de Lange patch (20031124)

by Bastiaan Jacques

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, I am dissecting and reviewing Frank de Lange's 14,000 line patch that was rejected by the core dillo developers due to its size. I will email the list from time to time to gather input as to whether a particular portion of the patch is useful or not, beginning with the patch a little further down this message. The following patch does does two things in selection.c: - - make a_Selection_set_dclick_callback replace the callback instead of returning when the callback was already set. * This function is called only once in the code (in interface.c); the callback pointer always points to the same function. So I don't see a point in merging this first hunk, although it won't do any harm. Thoughts? - - Replace three comparison operators (==) with bitwise AND.. * This only works as expected when either lvalue and rvalue have exactly one or zero bits set to 1. Although this currently is true, this may change in the future; thus, I don't think these three hunks should be merged. Regards, Bastiaan Jacques. diff -Nur --exclude-from /home/andi/freeciv/diff_ignore dillo-bak/src/selection.c dillo/src/selection.c - --- dillo-bak/src/selection.c 2004-02-20 14:28:59.000000000 +0100 +++ dillo/src/selection.c 2004-02-20 14:30:17.000000000 +0100 @@ -76,7 +76,10 @@ ~ void (*fn) (gpointer data), ~ gpointer data) ~ { - - g_return_if_fail (selection->dclick_callback == NULL); + /* this used to return when the callback was already set, + * changed function to replace callback instead. + * g_return_if_fail (selection->dclick_callback == NULL); + */ ~ selection->dclick_callback = fn; ~ selection->callback_data = data; ~ } @@ -426,7 +429,7 @@ ~ DwIterator *top = it->stack[it->stack_top]; ~ gint len; - - if (top->content.type == DW_CONTENT_TEXT) + if (top->content.type & DW_CONTENT_TEXT) ~ len = strlen(top->content.data.text); ~ else ~ len = 1; @@ -486,7 +489,7 @@ ~ for (i = a_Dw_ext_iterator_clone (a), start = TRUE; ~ (cmp = a_Dw_ext_iterator_compare (i, b)) <= 0; ~ a_Dw_ext_iterator_next (i), start = FALSE) { - - if (i->content.type == DW_CONTENT_TEXT) { + if (i->content.type & DW_CONTENT_TEXT) { ~ if (fl) { ~ if (start) { ~ DEBUG_MSG (2, " highlighting %s from %d to %d\n", @@ -537,7 +540,7 @@ ~ cmp = a_Dw_ext_iterator_compare (selection->from, selection->to); ~ if (cmp == 0) { - - if (selection->from->content.type == DW_CONTENT_TEXT) { + if (selection->from->content.type & DW_CONTENT_TEXT) { ~ si = selection->from->stack[selection->from->stack_top]; ~ if (selection->from_char < selection->to_char) ~ tmp = g_strndup(si->content.data.text + selection->from_char, -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB77I5wDeUwhiOHwURAkYeAKCzu03fggXw2DvdEiBWAP4GicLw5wCggUid Kg67vhiAUHc2dK+jGGVtE9o= =AGq9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Jan. 20, 2005