- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev]Using dillo on SourceForge

by Diego Sáenz

Very thanks. I will try it now. DarkSpirit/Diego El Tue, 26 Apr 2005 11:16:54 +0200 Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)dillo.org> escribio: > Hi Diego, > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 09:18:40PM +0200, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 10:18:17AM +0200, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > > Hi Diego, > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 02:34:07PM +0200, Diego Sáenz wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, what's the status of the cookies dpi? > > > > It is almost done, but i need an answer to a big doubt before it. > > > > > > > > how can a function wait(with a timeout if posible) until the > > > > cookies dpi send the answer to dillo after dillo have send to dpi > > > > cookies a get_cookies command? > > > > > > Just let it block. Of course a non-blocking timeout or callback > > > approach can be used (as with DNS or HTTP), but in this case the > > > wait time is so short that it is not worth (it will be faster > > > than bookmarks). > > > > Unfortunately, after a long look into the code, I found out > > that there's no easy way to make it block (the natural way). > > > > Making it non-blocking is possible but non-trivial. I'll give > > it another try tomorrow... > > Here's the patch! (I will send to you, not to the list). > > After a long day of coding a really hairy hack to make a non- > blocking approach, It was almost working, but I didn't push it > further because it was too ugly! :-) > > The good part is that after all that thought, a natural way to > make it block came to me, so that's what the patch is. It has all > the necessary stuff to bind your work. > > It comes with a custom cookies.dpi server example, the query is > shown on stdout... Oh, it will be clear from the patch and its > comments... > > It was a heavy context switch, now I'm back to the FLTK port. > > -- > Cheers > Jorge.- > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)dillo.org > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev

April 26, 2005

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?]

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 05:06:52PM -0000, Ballance, Robert T wrote: > > > By the way, jcid@, I heard you were at FOSDEM, and were staying with > > > Mind.be, which one were you again, I was staying there with the > > > MirOS/MirBSD hackers, I stayed up all night working on ports, so I > > > probably saw you downstairs sometime hacking away (or listening to those > > > comical Plan9 fellows talk ;)) > > > > There were two guys with long black hair. One was the Plan9 > > speechman, the other was me. ...and, we spend more than an hour > > talking to each other that night. ;) > > > > BTW, there was a guy in the room, playin funny music on his > > notebook. Was it you? :-) > > Now I know who you were, heh, I was that blond young fellow, not the german > guy, I am/was the American. I had a shitty old IBM Thinkpad with a big BSD > sticker on the back, I came down later, after all the MirOS(/BSD) fellows had > gone to sleep. I seem to remember that laptop... Probably mine is older. > > That Plan9 fellow was awfully opinionated wasn't he? :-P Yes, but he also had a lot of knowledge, and he was willing to share and discuss it (a thing that's not very common), so I really enjoyed the talk. > > He discarded the FreeBSD Project as anything worth a damn on the grounds that > "how can a OS be respected that doesn't even have their own compiler?" Maybe it was an indirect pointer to Ken Thompson's reflections on trusting trust. > Btw, are you going to do anything GNU/specific with the FLTK port, or will > there be the possibility of porting Dillo/FLTK to Windows (blech! but still, > OSS on Windows is useful :)) AFAIK, there're still some Windows limitations as, for instance, not being possible to watch a pipe's activity with select(). We'll see... -- Cheers Jorge.-

April 26, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Using dillo on SourceForge

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Hi Diego, On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 09:18:40PM +0200, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 10:18:17AM +0200, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > Hi Diego, > > > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 02:34:07PM +0200, Diego Sáenz wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, what's the status of the cookies dpi? > > > It is almost done, but i need an answer to a big doubt before it. > > > > > > how can a function wait(with a timeout if posible) until the > > > cookies dpi send the answer to dillo after dillo have send to dpi > > > cookies a get_cookies command? > > > > Just let it block. Of course a non-blocking timeout or callback > > approach can be used (as with DNS or HTTP), but in this case the > > wait time is so short that it is not worth (it will be faster > > than bookmarks). > > Unfortunately, after a long look into the code, I found out > that there's no easy way to make it block (the natural way). > > Making it non-blocking is possible but non-trivial. I'll give > it another try tomorrow... Here's the patch! (I will send to you, not to the list). After a long day of coding a really hairy hack to make a non- blocking approach, It was almost working, but I didn't push it further because it was too ugly! :-) The good part is that after all that thought, a natural way to make it block came to me, so that's what the patch is. It has all the necessary stuff to bind your work. It comes with a custom cookies.dpi server example, the query is shown on stdout... Oh, it will be clear from the patch and its comments... It was a heavy context switch, now I'm back to the FLTK port. -- Cheers Jorge.-

April 26, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Using dillo on SourceForge

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 10:18:17AM +0200, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > Hi Diego, > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 02:34:07PM +0200, Diego Sáenz wrote: > > > > > > > Hmm, what's the status of the cookies dpi? > > It is almost done, but i need an answer to a big doubt before it. > > > > how can a function wait(with a timeout if posible) until the > > cookies dpi send the answer to dillo after dillo have send to dpi > > cookies a get_cookies command? > > Just let it block. Of course a non-blocking timeout or callback > approach can be used (as with DNS or HTTP), but in this case the > wait time is so short that it is not worth (it will be faster > than bookmarks). Unfortunately, after a long look into the code, I found out that there's no easy way to make it block (the natural way). Making it non-blocking is possible but non-trivial. I'll give it another try tomorrow... -- Cheers Jorge.-

April 24, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Using dillo on SourceForge

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Hi Diego, On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 02:34:07PM +0200, Diego Sáenz wrote: > > > > Hmm, what's the status of the cookies dpi? > It is almost done, but i need an answer to a big doubt before it. > > how can a function wait(with a timeout if posible) until the > cookies dpi send the answer to dillo after dillo have send to dpi > cookies a get_cookies command? Just let it block. Of course a non-blocking timeout or callback approach can be used (as with DNS or HTTP), but in this case the wait time is so short that it is not worth (it will be faster than bookmarks). > more explained: > the a_Cookies_get function in dillo send a get_cookies command > to cookies dpi, then wait a command from the cookies dpi with the > answer and the function return the cookies. Yes, I understand. If you're curious just take a look at the chat command in bookmarks. There're three questions and answers for adding a bookmark! :-) > I have try to do the same that bookmarks dpi but the function > used in it is void. I have try to understand ccc but i get it > only superficialy. The CCC is hard to understand from the code (don't waste your time). I'll try to take a look into it today and send you some code that does the trick, so you can hook your work to it. -- Cheers Jorge.-

April 24, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Using dillo on SourceForge

by Diego Sáenz

> > As far as I understand, the https dpi plugin does not handle cookies > > because the cookies do not find their way to cookies.c So you > > probably have to wait for the cookies dpi. can you give a url to test it? thanks > > Hmm, what's the status of the cookies dpi? It is almost done, but i need an answer to a big doubt before it. how can a function wait(with a timeout if posible) until the cookies dpi send the answer to dillo after dillo have send to dpi cookies a get_cookies command? more explained: the a_Cookies_get function in dillo send a get_cookies command to cookies dpi, then wait a command from the cookies dpi with the answer and the function return the cookies. I have try to do the same that bookmarks dpi but the function used in it is void. I have try to understand ccc but i get it only superficialy. DarkSpirit/Diego

April 23, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Using dillo on SourceForge

by Jeremy Henty

On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 07:20:46PM +0200, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:34:55 +0100 > Jeremy Henty <jeremy(a)chaos.org.uk> wrote: > > > Is the SSL-enabled version of dillo-0.8.4 up to managing > > SourceForge accounts? ... > > You need some of these ssl-patches (with an older dillo) which do > not use the dpi interface Are you saying I need to check out a previous version of dillo and forward-port some patches? If so, which version and which patches? > As far as I understand, the https dpi plugin does not handle cookies > because the cookies do not find their way to cookies.c So you > probably have to wait for the cookies dpi. Hmm, what's the status of the cookies dpi? Thanks for your help. Cheers, Jeremy

April 16, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Using dillo on SourceForge

by Andreas Kemnade

On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 20:34:55 +0100 Jeremy Henty <jeremy(a)chaos.org.uk> wrote: > > Is the SSL-enabled version of dillo-0.8.4 up to managing SourceForge > accounts? I'm on the login page at > <URL:https://sourceforge.net/account/login.php> but when I click the > "Login with SSL" button the page just blinks at me as if I'd refreshed > the it. I don't get logged in. Is anyone using a SourceForge account > through dillo? > You need some of these ssl-patches (with an older dillo) which do not use the dpi interface because SF needs cookies to login. With that, you can use at least the SF installation at auriga.wearlab.de As far as I understand, the https dpi plugin does not handle cookies because the cookies do not find their way to cookies.c So you probably have to wait for the cookies dpi. Greetings Andreas Kemnade

April 9, 2005

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?]

by Ballance, Robert T

> > By the way, jcid@, I heard you were at FOSDEM, and were staying with > > Mind.be, which one were you again, I was staying there with the > > MirOS/MirBSD hackers, I stayed up all night working on ports, so I > > probably saw you downstairs sometime hacking away (or listening to those > > comical Plan9 fellows talk ;)) > > There were two guys with long black hair. One was the Plan9 > speechman, the other was me. ...and, we spend more than an hour > talking to each other that night. ;) > > BTW, there was a guy in the room, playin funny music on his > notebook. Was it you? :-) Now I know who you were, heh, I was that blond young fellow, not the german guy, I am/was the American. I had a shitty old IBM Thinkpad with a big BSD sticker on the back, I came down later, after all the MirOS(/BSD) fellows had gone to sleep. That Plan9 fellow was awfully opinionated wasn't he? :-P He discarded the FreeBSD Project as anything worth a damn on the grounds that "how can a OS be respected that doesn't even have their own compiler?" Oh well, it was fun, I'm almost certain that i'll be coming to FOSDEM next year, you should coax Mind.be into flying you over again (hopefully the FLTK port is completely usable by then ;)) Btw, are you going to do anything GNU/specific with the FLTK port, or will there be the possibility of porting Dillo/FLTK to Windows (blech! but still, OSS on Windows is useful :)) -R. Tyler Ballance

April 5, 2005

Re: [Fwd: Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?]

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 12:20:33PM -0600, R. Tyler Ballance wrote: > [...] > By the way, jcid@, I heard you were at FOSDEM, and were staying with > Mind.be, which one were you again, I was staying there with the > MirOS/MirBSD hackers, I stayed up all night working on ports, so I > probably saw you downstairs sometime hacking away (or listening to those > comical Plan9 fellows talk ;)) There were two guys with long black hair. One was the Plan9 speechman, the other was me. ...and, we spend more than an hour talking to each other that night. ;) BTW, there was a guy in the room, playin funny music on his notebook. Was it you? :-) -- Cheers Jorge.-

April 5, 2005