- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev]Viewing HTTP Headers with DPI

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 06:31:18AM +0800, Russell J. Wood wrote: > On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 05:13:11PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 12:17:20PM +0800, Russell J. Wood wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Is it possible to view all request/response headers using DPI? > > > > That depends on the specific dpi. Please explain it further. > > Well, it's not for a specific DPI, I would like to know if it's possible to > get that information using DPI as if it is, I would like to write a plugin to > do it. > > It's just I didn't see much in the documentation about getting that information. Currently, dpip is not providing a dpi-command to request dillo for that info. Now, it can be done in a quite similar way that the cookies dpi (currently on testing) does. BTW, what for? (if not under NDA of course :) -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 8, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Viewing HTTP Headers with DPI

by Russell J. Wood

On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 05:13:11PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 12:17:20PM +0800, Russell J. Wood wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Is it possible to view all request/response headers using DPI? > > That depends on the specific dpi. Please explain it further. Well, it's not for a specific DPI, I would like to know if it's possible to get that information using DPI as if it is, I would like to write a plugin to do it. It's just I didn't see much in the documentation about getting that information. - Russell

June 7, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Access for end users for fltk dillo

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:14:49PM +0200, meka wrote: > Can we have something like this? I know it is not done yet, but there are some things I would like to see. For example, gcc-4.0 on amd64 treats this as an error > > void *tmp; > int i = (int)tmp; > > I would hate to have to debug it later, so it would be nice to > have fltk version od dillo while it is still "young", and try to > patch things. I do have both compilers, but sooner or later, > people will have to patch it on SuSE, Slackware or whatever > distro they have. Why not making it correct right now? Thanx. :o) Basically because we don't have a "young" tree yet; we have specific parts that we assemble and test isolated. We hope to have a tree shortly after LSM 2005. -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 7, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Viewing HTTP Headers with DPI

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 12:17:20PM +0800, Russell J. Wood wrote: > Hi all, > > Is it possible to view all request/response headers using DPI? That depends on the specific dpi. Please explain it further. -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 7, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Preparing the dillo-0.8.5 release.

by Kelson Vibber

Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > Back to dillo-0.8.5: this release is mainly a bug-fix release. > The final touches were just uploaded to current CVS. Please > download it, test, and report back to the list on how it works. > This will help me to make the tarball and release it ASAP. Thursday's CVS seems to work fine here (Fedora Core 3 x86), and RPM didn't need any major changes. -- Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

June 6, 2005

[Dillo-dev]Access for end users for fltk dillo

by meka

Can we have something like this? I know it is not done yet, but there are some things I would like to see. For example, gcc-4.0 on amd64 treats this as an error void *tmp; int i = (int)tmp; I would hate to have to debug it later, so it would be nice to have fltk version od dillo while it is still "young", and try to patch things. I do have both compilers, but sooner or later, people will have to patch it on SuSE, Slackware or whatever distro they have. Why not making it correct right now? Thanx. :o) -- Pinguin? Daemon? Fish? Dragon fly? Grow up. Windows are the future, daemons and animals are for fairy tales.

June 6, 2005

[Dillo-dev]Viewing HTTP Headers with DPI

by Russell J. Wood

Hi all, Is it possible to view all request/response headers using DPI? - Russell

June 5, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Preparing the dillo-0.8.5 release.

by Thomas-Martin Seck

* meka (meka(a)softhome.net) > On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:06:03 +0200 > Thomas-Martin Seck <tmseck-lists(a)netcologne.de> wrote: > > > * Jorge Arellano Cid (jcid(a)dillo.org) > > > > Will FLTK2.0 be officially released by then? I'm asking because I can > > only update dillo to FLTK-dillo when we have a FLTK2 port in the FreeBSD > > ports tree. (I just looked and we don't even seem have FLTK 1.2 in > > there, only 1.1.6. Hm. Looks like work.) > I am working on a port, but don't know how to implement svn in fetch > (I know there is do-fetch). I just need to test few things. The main No need to do this; just fetch the latest snapshot and update the port once in a while regarding the snapshot revision. Since the snapshots seem to be kept for about 3 months you do not need to worry too much about the port becoming unfetchable. > problem is the error while compiling it with system compiler (gcc-4.1 > works just fine). Nice to hear! You should submit gcc related problems to the FLTK folks, though. FreeBSD will use gcc 3.4 on 5.x and 6.x for quite a while and I guess the other BSDs will follow suit. > I think I will finish it in about a month (I'm > really busy right now), and I don't think fltk-dillo will be released > soon (I hope I'm wrong :o). I'm looking forward to it! Regards, -- Thomas-Martin Seck

June 4, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Preparing the dillo-0.8.5 release.

by Thomas-Martin Seck

* Jorge Arellano Cid (jcid(a)dillo.org) > > I'm asking because I can > > only update dillo to FLTK-dillo when we have a FLTK2 port in the FreeBSD > > ports tree. (I just looked and we don't even seem have FLTK 1.2 in > > there, only 1.1.6. Hm. Looks like work.) > > FLTK2 is much cleaner, and multiplatform, so it should'n be > that hard to port. BTW, can't you have a statically linked > FLTK2-based dillo in FreeBSD? This would work, I'll see what I can do. I'm doing a similar dance with Felix von Leitner's libowfat/gatling projects at the moment regarding library dependencies. I'll coordinate efforts with the current maintainer of FLTK 1.1.6. > > I managed to fetch a few minor updates around 0700 UTC -- the CVS server > > seems to have died after that. Could someone investigate? > > At least for me CVS is working now, as of this writting. Seems to have been a transient problem at wearlab.de; my mail took some time to be delivered to the list, too. > > What I got > > calls itself 0.8.5-pre and works as well as 0.8.4 on both FreeBSD 4 > > and 5 (i386). > > Yes, that's the one. I'm just to change 0.8.5-pre to 0.8.5 and > update the splash screen brief before packing the tarball for the > final test before public release. Ok, I just checked and I indeed got all changes. Looks OK for me. Regards, -- Thomas-Martin Seck

June 4, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Preparing the dillo-0.8.5 release.

by meka

On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 12:06:03 +0200 Thomas-Martin Seck <tmseck-lists(a)netcologne.de> wrote: > * Jorge Arellano Cid (jcid(a)dillo.org) > > Will FLTK2.0 be officially released by then? I'm asking because I can > only update dillo to FLTK-dillo when we have a FLTK2 port in the FreeBSD > ports tree. (I just looked and we don't even seem have FLTK 1.2 in > there, only 1.1.6. Hm. Looks like work.) I am working on a port, but don't know how to implement svn in fetch (I know there is do-fetch). I just need to test few things. The main problem is the error while compiling it with system compiler (gcc-4.1 works just fine). I think I will finish it in about a month (I'm really busy right now), and I don't think fltk-dillo will be released soon (I hope I'm wrong :o). -- Pinguin? Daemon? Fish? Dragon fly? Grow up. Windows are the future, daemons and animals are for fairy tales.

June 4, 2005