- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

release preparations (was Re: [Dillo-dev] Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?)

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 03:01:36PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 07:57:18PM +0200, Alexander Voigt wrote: > > Hi. > > > > > OK, rc1 for dillo-2.2.1 is here: > > > > > > http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-2.2.1-rc1.tar.bz2 > > > > > > Please download, build, test and report how it works in your OS. > > > > Dillo 2.2.1 rc1 compiles and runs smoothly on my machine: > > > > Debian 6.0 GNU/Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 > > gcc (Debian 4.4.5-8) 4.4.5 > > FLTK 2.0.x r7513 > > Thanks for the report. > Now, let's expect some more... Compiles and runs fine on: DragonFly 2.11-DEVELOPMENT gcc (DragonFly) 4.4.6 Cheers, Johannes

July 18, 2011

release preparations (was Re: [Dillo-dev] Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?)

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 07:57:18PM +0200, Alexander Voigt wrote: > Hi. > > > OK, rc1 for dillo-2.2.1 is here: > > > > http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-2.2.1-rc1.tar.bz2 > > > > Please download, build, test and report how it works in your OS. > > Dillo 2.2.1 rc1 compiles and runs smoothly on my machine: > > Debian 6.0 GNU/Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 > gcc (Debian 4.4.5-8) 4.4.5 > FLTK 2.0.x r7513 Thanks for the report. Now, let's expect some more... -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 18, 2011

release preparations (was Re: [Dillo-dev] Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?)

by Hole.destructor＠gmx.de

Hi. > OK, rc1 for dillo-2.2.1 is here: > > http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-2.2.1-rc1.tar.bz2 > > Please download, build, test and report how it works in your OS. Dillo 2.2.1 rc1 compiles and runs smoothly on my machine: Debian 6.0 GNU/Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 gcc (Debian 4.4.5-8) 4.4.5 FLTK 2.0.x r7513 Kind regards, Alexander

July 18, 2011

release preparations (was Re: [Dillo-dev] Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?)

by jcid＠dillo.org

Hi, OK, rc1 for dillo-2.2.1 is here: http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-2.2.1-rc1.tar.bz2 Please download, build, test and report how it works in your OS. If we're lucky it will become dillo-2.2.1. TIA -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 18, 2011

Repository branch name

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 10:17:33PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > Hi, > > Is there an easy way to rename the repo name from "dillo_port1.3" > to "dillo3"? I'd rather merge dillo_port1.3 over into our main repository, once dillo-2.2.1 is tagged and released. I can do that. Cheers, Johannes

July 17, 2011

release preparations (was Re: [Dillo-dev] Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?)

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 09:45:14AM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 02:55:51PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 05:28:34PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > Jorge wrote: > > > > I'm working on the tarball now: > > > > > > Oh, excellent! > > > > Ok, committed. > > > > The dates are left blank of course. > > Please check the splash page and correct my english. > > > > That should be it. I've not tested it though. > > Today I made some tests, and found that newer FLTK2 versions as > alpha-r8800, changed the internal API, rendering some parts of > dillo-2.2.1 unusable. (e.g. "Open file", Close dialog, Repost > dialog). > > fltk-2.0.x-r7513 works fine for me. > > The simple solution is to suggest a library version range in > the README. e.g. > > "The FLTK2 library is statically linked into Dillo2. > You can get it from fltk.org. > The recommended version is >= r6916 and <=r7513 > > http://fltk.org/software.php?VERSION=2.0.x-r7513" > > > Comments? I would simply give a known good revision of fltk2. Nevertheless we should let the fltk guys know about the incompatible changes. Cheers, Johannes

July 17, 2011

release preparations (was Re: [Dillo-dev] Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?)

by jcid＠dillo.org

Hi there, Please report your OS/platform for dillo3 if not already listed in the compatibility page. TIA. -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 17, 2011

release preparations (was Re: [Dillo-dev] Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?)

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jorge wrote: > OK, does anybody see anything pending before packing dillo-2.2.1-rc1? > > (Yes, there're some web site updates pending, > I mean just inside the tarball). I just updated a couple of version numbers...

July 16, 2011

release preparations (was Re: [Dillo-dev] Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?)

by jcid＠dillo.org

Hi, OK, does anybody see anything pending before packing dillo-2.2.1-rc1? (Yes, there're some web site updates pending, I mean just inside the tarball). -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 16, 2011

release preparations (was Re: [Dillo-dev] Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?)

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jorge wrote: > On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:29:15AM -0400, Benjamin Johnson wrote: > > On Fri, 15 Jul 2011 09:45:14 -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid > > <jcid(a)dillo.org> wrote: > > > > >On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 02:55:51PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > > > > > Today I made some tests, and found that newer FLTK2 versions as > > >alpha-r8800, changed the internal API, rendering some parts of > > >dillo-2.2.1 unusable. (e.g. "Open file", Close dialog, Repost > > >dialog). > > > > > > fltk-2.0.x-r7513 works fine for me. > > > > > > The simple solution is to suggest a library version range in > > >the README. e.g. > > > > > > "The FLTK2 library is statically linked into Dillo2. > > > You can get it from fltk.org. > > > The recommended version is >= r6916 and <=r7513 > > Done. > > I also added a download link since older fltk-2.0 revisions are > no longer available from fltk.org. > > BTW, the recipe to build dillo in our web site was also updated: > > http://www.dillo.org/source.html I gave download.html its own copy of FLTK2 instructions since pointing people to the beginning of source.html is confusing for now.

July 16, 2011