- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

multiple search engines

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 07:30:39PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Rogut??s wrote: > > What about less dialogs and better reuse of the location bar? > > One could define some engines in dillorc: > > search_g = google.com/search?q=%s > > search_yahoo = search.yahoo.com/?q=%s > > and type the keyword followed by a search string in the location bar: > > g some search string > > yahoo some search string > > Hmm, it _would_ be nice to be able to define location bar macros. It would be quite simple now that there's a PREFS_STRINGS type. e.g. search_macro="g http://google.com/search?q=%s" search_macro="yahoo http://search.yahoo.com/?q=%s" and it would please both CLI and GUI oriented users. -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 26, 2011

fltk-1.3 port merged into main repository

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

Hi, now that we have the last fltk-2 based version out, the fltk-1.3 port has been merged into the main repository. >From now on please only commit to the main branch again. The temporary dillo_port1.3 repository will disappear soon. Let's polish dillo-3 and get a release out soon! Cheers, Johannes

July 26, 2011

are we officially at feature freeze yet?

by corvid＠lavabit.com

It would be nice just to make some fixes and get 3.0 out... Bugs: - moveToWidget(). Jorge has code for this. - downloads dpi string escaping. - UI_TEMPORARILY_SHOW_PANELS Not exactly important: - the panel problems when resizing from very small.

July 26, 2011

multiple search engines

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Rogut?s wrote: > What about less dialogs and better reuse of the location bar? > One could define some engines in dillorc: > search_g = google.com/search?q=%s > search_yahoo = search.yahoo.com/?q=%s > and type the keyword followed by a search string in the location bar: > g some search string > yahoo some search string Hmm, it _would_ be nice to be able to define location bar macros.

July 26, 2011

multiple search engines

by obeythepenguin＠gmail.com

On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:55:34 -0400, Rogut?s Sparnuotos <rogutes(a)googlemail.com> wrote: > What about less dialogs and better reuse of the location bar? > One could define some engines in dillorc: > search_g = google.com/search?q=%s > search_yahoo = search.yahoo.com/?q=%s > and type the keyword followed by a search string in the location bar: > g some search string > yahoo some search string > I've thought of adding something like that myself, actually. Opera does that, and it's the only way I search now. ~Benjamin

July 26, 2011

multiple search engines

by rogutes＠googlemail.com

corvid (2011-07-24 21:35): > > What if it was like: > > > Search [Fl_Choice] > > [Fl_Input] > > [Fl_Button] [Fl_Button] What about less dialogs and better reuse of the location bar? One could define some engines in dillorc: search_g = google.com/search?q=%s search_yahoo = search.yahoo.com/?q=%s and type the keyword followed by a search string in the location bar: g some search string yahoo some search string -- -- Rogut?s Sparnuotos

July 26, 2011

Downloading a file twice

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:20:54AM +0200, Alexander Voigt wrote: > Hi Dillo developers. > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 09:49:10PM +0200, Alexander Voigt wrote: > > Thanks, the current repo fixes the bug for me! > > I just noticed that this bug is also present in the current release > candidate dillo-2.2.1-rc1. I would recommend to fix this bug also in > the upcomming release, if possible. There were several other bugfixes and improvements that were not backported to the dillo-2.x branch. We could think we lack a maintainer for the 2.x branch, but that's not the case as the branch is officially deprecated, and we want to focus all the manpower in dillo3. Thanks for the catch anyway. -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 26, 2011

multiple search engines

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 09:35:41PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > What if it was like: > > > Search [Fl_Choice] > > [Fl_Input] > > [Fl_Button] [Fl_Button] Yes, I thought of it, and also about just a down arrow, but receeded. 1.- Down arrow . . Search: [ ][v] [Fl_Button] [Fl_Button] . . It is less visible (and not obvious) and may be expected to bring past search strings. 2.- . . Search: [Fl_Choice]: [ ] [Fl_Button] [Fl_Button] . . It brings attention first to [Fl_Choice], and in most cases, it's better to focus it first on the text input (and when the user wants a secondary search engine he knows beforehand he'll be changing it). It breaks just hitting tabkey to change search engine quickly. -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 26, 2011

release preparations (was Re: [Dillo-dev] Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?)

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 07:54:34PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > [...] > No more reports have come my way. > A couple more days and it'll become a release. OK, the dillo-2.2.1 release is done. The freshmeat announcement was also submitted (now waiting for verification). I'm happy because now we can concentrate on dillo3 and its upcoming release! :-) -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 26, 2011

multiple search engines

by corvid＠lavabit.com

What if it was like: Search [Fl_Choice] [Fl_Input] [Fl_Button] [Fl_Button]

July 24, 2011