- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev] Website improvement / CVS page

by Thorben Thuermer

On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 06:14:28PM +0100, Sebastian Leske wrote: > Hi, > > So I do need to login first. That's with CVS version 1.10.7 , on SuSE7.0 . > On a different system, the "checkout without login" works, that's with CVS > version 1.11.1p1 . > > Maybe the "checkout without login" only works in later releases of CVS? (I > didn't find anything in the NEWS file, though) After some looking at CVS source, we found that it is indeed a new "feature" of newer CVS versions... I updated the Auriga CVS page with a note about logging in now. Greetings, Thorben Thuermer (r00t(a)wearlab.de)

Feb. 20, 2003

Activating bookmarks menu crashes Dillo 0.7 ?

by Philip Ganchev

Hi, Am I doing something wrong, or is this a bug? Following the instructions in dillo-0.7.0/INSTALL, I configure, compile, install and run Dillo, then click on the Bookmarks menu. Dillo crashes. ------------ % ./configure --target=$HOME % make % make install<No error messages.> % src/dillo Setting locale to C... dillo_dns_init: Here we go! The cookies file has a file lock: disabling cookies in this dillo! Nav_open_url: Url=>about:splash< IO_write: Changing io->Buf (4096) IO_write: EAGAIN IO_write: Changing io->Buf (4096) IO_write: EAGAIN <Dillo running> Click on the Bookmarks menu Nav_open_url: Url=>dpi:/bm/< Server NOT running waitpid: No child processes <waited 256 cycles for server to be on line> [connect]: No such file or directory Not implemented Gdk-ERROR **: X connection to :0.0 broken (explicit kill or server shutdown).--------------- I'm running Red Hat Linux on Intel Pentium II. Thanks, Philip __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/

Feb. 20, 2003

[PATCH] The patches I sent yesterday

by Patrice Mandin

Sorry, forget about the gtk-related patch, it does not work the way it is written. -- Patrice Mandin WWW: http://membres.lycos.fr/pmandin/ Programmeur Linux, Atari Spécialité: Développement, jeux

Feb. 19, 2003

[PATCH] Some patches for configure.in

by Patrice Mandin

Hello everybody, Here are 2 small patches for Dillo: - The first one add necessary stuff to do cross-compilation easy. - The other one just modify the detection for glib/gtk, because the way it is currently done pollutes the CFLAGS variable: When you have gtk/glib missing, libjpeg is not detected. Note: I am the one who ported Dillo to Atari MiNT m68k platform. But it does not work correctly. This is why I did not notice it to you. -- Patrice Mandin WWW: http://membres.lycos.fr/pmandin/ Programmeur Linux, Atari Spécialité: Développement, jeux

Feb. 19, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] I don't really get this...

by Kelson Vibber

At 11:15 AM 2/17/2003, slymer(a)slymer.org wrote: >./configure --prefix=$HOME >... >Therefore I suggest that the script should look for $HOME/.dillo >not $HOME/etc Usually the prefix is /usr/local or /usr - it makes much more sense to place the configuration file in /usr/local/etc instead of /usr/local/.dillo. If you're doing a system-wide installation, then you *do* want to place dillorc in /etc and not $HOME/.dillo, or else only root gets a config file. What you can do is compile dillo like this: ./configure --prefix=$HOME --sysconfdir=$HOME/.dillo That will install the new dillorc in $HOME/.dillo Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

Feb. 19, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] patches

by Livio Baldini Soares

Hey folks! Phillip Warner writes: > On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:15:33 +0100 > Nicola Girardi <nicola(a)g-n-u.de> wrote: > > > > > > <alt>-w closes the window (instead of <ctrl>-q) > > > > > > > > Why isn't this C-w as in most GTK applications? In most GTK > > > > apps(well all the apps I've ever used) I see C-w means close > > > > window and C-q means close all windows and exit. [...] > I did not take it as a direct complaint. :^) I think this is a very > relevant question (and thread) as well, and worthy of a short > discussion. However, I shall not lead it, as I do not know the > initial reasons why these default keybindings were chosen. > > I thought I would give you my reasons for choosing what I did, which > could open the discussion further. In my very humble opinion what needs to be discussed is a way for everyone to be pleased with whatever key bindings Dillo is setup with. How? I think we should have a "default" set of key bindings, which may or may not please everyone, _but_, more importantly, add the possibly of specifying alternate ones in the dillorc file. The code shouldn't be too hard to do, but perhaps a tad bit tedious. The options might look like: key_close_window=C-w key_quit=C-q key_back=backspace key_forward=F8 Discussions on key bindings keep reappearing on this list, which leads me to think that a more general solution like the one I've proposed is needed. Unfortunately, my hacking time has been cut down drastically. If someone wants to implement this, I'll be gald to help out. best regards, -- Livio <livio(a)ime.usp.br>

Feb. 19, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] patches

by Phillip Warner

On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:15:33 +0100 Nicola Girardi <nicola(a)g-n-u.de> wrote: > > > > <alt>-w closes the window (instead of <ctrl>-q) > > > > > > Why isn't this C-w as in most GTK applications? In most GTK > > > apps(well all the apps I've ever used) I see C-w means close > > > window and C-q means close all windows and exit. > > > > > > > I, for one, do not know. > > Oh, I didn't mean to complain to you directly--I just chose an > appropriate thread for the issue. :) > I did not take it as a direct complaint. :^) I think this is a very relevant question (and thread) as well, and worthy of a short discussion. However, I shall not lead it, as I do not know the initial reasons why these default keybindings were chosen. I thought I would give you my reasons for choosing what I did, which could open the discussion further. Cheers, --Phil ------------------------------ Don't ever slam a door; you might want to go back.

Feb. 19, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] patches

by Nicola Girardi

> > > <alt>-w closes the window (instead of <ctrl>-q) > > > > Why isn't this C-w as in most GTK applications? In most GTK apps > > (well all the apps I've ever used) I see C-w means close window and > > C-q means close all windows and exit. > > > > I, for one, do not know. Oh, I didn't mean to complain to you directly--I just chose an appropriate thread for the issue. :)

Feb. 19, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] patches

by Phillip Warner

On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:03:25 +0100 Nicola Girardi <nicola(a)g-n-u.de> wrote: > > <alt>-w closes the window (instead of <ctrl>-q) > > Why isn't this C-w as in most GTK applications? In most GTK apps > (well all the apps I've ever used) I see C-w means close window and > C-q means close all windows and exit. > I, for one, do not know. I chose alt for my patch because that is what I am used to (Netscape). IMO, alt is certainly easier on a laptop. Cheers, --Phil

Feb. 19, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] patches

by Nicola Girardi

> <alt>-w closes the window (instead of <ctrl>-q) Why isn't this C-w as in most GTK applications? In most GTK apps (well all the apps I've ever used) I see C-w means close window and C-q means close all windows and exit.

Feb. 19, 2003