- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

floating tables

by Joe Crayne

The floating tables patch is now available against current CVS with text selection. http://home.earthlink.net/~crayne2/floats.html Cheers Joe.-

March 15, 2003

(no subject)

by pekdon＠gmx.net

March 14, 2003

Selection

by Sebastian Geerken

Hi! I've committed the text selection. There are still some glitches, look at src/selection.c in the sources for the known ones. Please check it out and test it. Sebastian PS: Full screen mode is now done by clicking on the button in the lower right corner.

March 14, 2003

Re: https approaches?

by Ami Fischman

I read the dpi1 document. As far as I can see, it refers to DPI's having a "scope" which URLs can fall inside of, and this scope is always prefixed with "dpi:/". Are you saying that: 1) There is no restriction in the code to the dpi:/ prefix? or, 2) You have no objection to removing the current restriction to dpi:/? If 1, please explain (or point to any documentation/source code that explains). As near as I can see dillo/src/IO/Url.c:a_Url_get_ccc_funct() branches to a_Dpi_ccc only if dpi:/ is the prefix. Furthermore, dillo/src/capi.c:a_Capi_open_url() branches on whether url_str starts with "dpi:/". If 2, do you already have plans in place for maintaining a list of which plugins handle which prefixes? Cheers, -- Ami Fischman usenet(a)fischman.org

March 14, 2003

RE: [Dillo-dev] Re: https approaches?

by Eric Gaudet

Speaking of dpi, it seems that only one plugin (that must be called bm_something) can exist in the current implementation. When will we be able to register multiple plugins? Thanks Eric

March 14, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Incorrect rendering of tables on fresco.org

by Sebastian Geerken

On Wed, Mar 12, TheStar wrote: > Also, is it possible to use dillo as a plug-in in non-gtk apps? (ie: porting) You may take a look at <http://www.freedesktop.org/standards/xembed.html>. Since dillo uses Gtk+ for embedding (although I don't know how far Gtk+ 1.2 complies to the specification), it's possible that using this protocol should do the job. Sebastian

March 14, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Re: https approaches?

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Ami Fischman wrote: > Thanks for the great summary. > > It looks to me like Jonathan Springer already implemented the BIO approach > for 0.6.5. The fact that it isn't integrated in 0.7 discourages me from > re-writing it for 0.7. > > Since implementing https as a pluging will require a change to the core > dillo code (AFAIK only dpi:/ URL's get handed to plugins), it would be nice > to get confirmation from the authors that this is OK (would be a candidate > for merging in) before spending the time. Jorge? Jorge wrote a full document explaining the dpi concept and also wrote a 30 page bookmarks server to illustrate it. Cheers Jorge.-

March 14, 2003

Re: https approaches?

by Ami Fischman

Thanks for the great summary. It looks to me like Jonathan Springer already implemented the BIO approach for 0.6.5. The fact that it isn't integrated in 0.7 discourages me from re-writing it for 0.7. Since implementing https as a pluging will require a change to the core dillo code (AFAIK only dpi:/ URL's get handed to plugins), it would be nice to get confirmation from the authors that this is OK (would be a candidate for merging in) before spending the time. Jorge? Cheers, -- Ami Fischman usenet(a)fischman.org

March 14, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] https approaches?

by Andreas Schweitzer

> Is anyone currently working on ssl support in dillo? To shed some light on this topic, I have searched the OLD mailing list archive since I did remember quite a bit. Here are some threads : http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=1975637 http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=1388644 note the last paragraph !, and follow the link to http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/702/2002/1/0/7681591/ Also, note Jonathan Springers work : http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=1601722 and its continuation at http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=1610063 BTW, the old archives should be searched from here : http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=603 Could a webmaster change the link to "Old Archives" on http://dillo.auriga.wearlab.de/MList.html ? Finally, note Jorge's very recent mail in which he lists some priorities : http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/pipermail/dillo-dev/2003-March/000229.html Cheers Andreas -- **************************** NEW ADDRESS ****************************** Hamburger Sternwarte Universitaet Hamburg Gojenbergsweg 112 Tel. ++49 40 42891 4016 D-21029 Hamburg, Germany Fax. ++49 40 42891 4198

March 14, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] https approaches?

by andi

Thu, 13 Mar 2003 15:51:09 -0800: Ami Fischman <usenet(a)fischman.org> > SSL support is one of the biggest lacks in dillo for me. To that end, > I'm thinking of adding it in. Without knowing the dillo codebase, I > see two obvious options: > 1) Add a src/IO/https.c file based on src/IO/http.c > 2) Move http.c to using openssl's BIO's which can support either > encrypted > or clear traffic, as well as filters. I think the dpi is, in favor of design, the best solution. I am no programmer, so don't count that much on me. But i have another idea. What about implementing every protocol as dpi? currently the dpi looks, for me as simple user: dpi:/bm/ but why not implementing it as bm://, so http:// would call the http-dpi, ftp:// would call the ftp-dpi, ... This would create a complete module-based client and dillo can be focused on displaying. http:// could be not much more than a wrapped wget, or i am wrong and this whole scheme is impossible? -- Andreas Zwinkau (andi.dasstellenwirinsinternet.de)

March 14, 2003