- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

[oph-villedieu@orange.fr: dillo_2.1.1]

by jcid＠dillo.org

Hi, I just received this email. The attached example shows the bug. Does anybody remember what we did with valign? ;) -- Cheers Jorge.-

Dec. 20, 2009

new fltk snapshot

by corvid＠lavabit.com

There's a new fltk2 snapshot with a change to the key handling code. I don't know whether it could make any difference for people who have had modifier problems, but it would probably be good to give it a try. http://fltk.org/articles.php?L958

Dec. 18, 2009

dillo2.x on Fedora 12

by newman.x＠gmail.com

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 4:47 AM, Globe Trotter <itsme_410(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Any likelihood of getting some Fedora 12 dillo2 RPMS? > You may try http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/dillo2/ should be the last release. There are static RPMs for F-11 and SRPM, which you can rebuild yourself for F-12, when you have installed static FLTK2 http://mnowak.fedorapeople.org/fltk2/static/ Though, unlikely to have Dillo 2 in Fedora as a supported package due to FLTK2, which is used in Dillo 2, is unreleased version, we don't wanna in Fedora. (Anyway FLTK2 seemed to me dead, last time I've looked, anyway.) Unless Dillo 2 is based on some released and supported toolkit, Dillo 2 won't be Fedora-supported. > Thanks for the great work!! > > Best, > T Michal

Dec. 18, 2009

dillo2.x on Fedora 12

by itsme_410＠yahoo.com

Hi, Any likelihood of getting some Fedora 12 dillo2 RPMS? Thanks for the great work!! Best, T

Dec. 18, 2009

take_focus on a new tab

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Johannes wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:37:36AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Johannes wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 06:58:28PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > Johannes wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:24:58PM +0900, furaisanjin wrote: > > > > > > 2009/12/15 Johannes Hofmann <Johannes.Hofmann(a)gmx.de>: > > > > > > > Any opinions? Does this solve the problem? > > > > > > > > > > > > Could you consider this patch? This solves both problems I reported. > > > > > > > > > > Looks good to me. Is this ok for all? > > > > > If there are no complaints I would commit a slightly modified version (attached). > > > > > > > > I think I like having Location lose focus after I press enter. > > > > > > but the patch I had proposed originally doesn't seem to fix all of > > > furaisanjin's issues. E.g. when starting dillo with an URL on > > > the commandline, the location bar will have the focus. > > > > > > Are there cases where my furaisanjin's patch causes unexpected > > > switches of focus, i.e. not triggered directly by a user action? > > > > I've completely lost track of what various versions do; > > I'm just saying that typing in an address, pressing enter, and > > having focus switch from Location to Main is nice. > > Ah ok. I just committed furaisanjin's patch with a minor change. I > there should be unexpected focus switches please report them, so we > can look it this again. Oh, I see the confusion now. I must have misapplied that last version somehow, because it wasn't changing focus for me, but now using that same patch from tip seems to be working fine. Sorry about that.

Dec. 17, 2009

take_focus on a new tab

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:37:36AM +0000, corvid wrote: > Johannes wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 06:58:28PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > Johannes wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:24:58PM +0900, furaisanjin wrote: > > > > > 2009/12/15 Johannes Hofmann <Johannes.Hofmann(a)gmx.de>: > > > > > > Any opinions? Does this solve the problem? > > > > > > > > > > Could you consider this patch? This solves both problems I reported. > > > > > > > > Looks good to me. Is this ok for all? > > > > If there are no complaints I would commit a slightly modified version (attached). > > > > > > I think I like having Location lose focus after I press enter. > > > > but the patch I had proposed originally doesn't seem to fix all of > > furaisanjin's issues. E.g. when starting dillo with an URL on > > the commandline, the location bar will have the focus. > > > > Are there cases where my furaisanjin's patch causes unexpected > > switches of focus, i.e. not triggered directly by a user action? > > I've completely lost track of what various versions do; > I'm just saying that typing in an address, pressing enter, and > having focus switch from Location to Main is nice. Ah ok. I just committed furaisanjin's patch with a minor change. I there should be unexpected focus switches please report them, so we can look it this again. Cheers, Johannes

Dec. 17, 2009

take_focus on a new tab

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Johannes wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 06:58:28PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Johannes wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:24:58PM +0900, furaisanjin wrote: > > > > 2009/12/15 Johannes Hofmann <Johannes.Hofmann(a)gmx.de>: > > > > > Any opinions? Does this solve the problem? > > > > > > > > Could you consider this patch? This solves both problems I reported. > > > > > > Looks good to me. Is this ok for all? > > > If there are no complaints I would commit a slightly modified version (attached). > > > > I think I like having Location lose focus after I press enter. > > but the patch I had proposed originally doesn't seem to fix all of > furaisanjin's issues. E.g. when starting dillo with an URL on > the commandline, the location bar will have the focus. > > Are there cases where my furaisanjin's patch causes unexpected > switches of focus, i.e. not triggered directly by a user action? I've completely lost track of what various versions do; I'm just saying that typing in an address, pressing enter, and having focus switch from Location to Main is nice.

Dec. 17, 2009

take_focus on a new tab

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 06:58:28PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Johannes wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:24:58PM +0900, furaisanjin wrote: > > > 2009/12/15 Johannes Hofmann <Johannes.Hofmann(a)gmx.de>: > > > > Any opinions? Does this solve the problem? > > > > > > Could you consider this patch? This solves both problems I reported. > > > > Looks good to me. Is this ok for all? > > If there are no complaints I would commit a slightly modified version (attached). > > I think I like having Location lose focus after I press enter. but the patch I had proposed originally doesn't seem to fix all of furaisanjin's issues. E.g. when starting dillo with an URL on the commandline, the location bar will have the focus. Are there cases where my furaisanjin's patch causes unexpected switches of focus, i.e. not triggered directly by a user action? Cheers, Johannes

Dec. 16, 2009

take_focus on a new tab

by tim.nieradzik＠gmx.de

> I think I like having Location lose focus after I press enter. I agree. This would be nice. --Tim

Dec. 15, 2009

take_focus on a new tab

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Johannes wrote: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 09:24:58PM +0900, furaisanjin wrote: > > 2009/12/15 Johannes Hofmann <Johannes.Hofmann(a)gmx.de>: > > > Any opinions? Does this solve the problem? > > > > Could you consider this patch? This solves both problems I reported. > > Looks good to me. Is this ok for all? > If there are no complaints I would commit a slightly modified version (attached). I think I like having Location lose focus after I press enter.

Dec. 15, 2009