- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev]Re: contrast_visited_color

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Mon, Aug 16, 2004 at 04:33:09PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote: > * opus(a)milneweb.com <opus(a)milneweb.com> [08-16-04 16:15]: > > Jorge Arellano Cid writes: > > > A suggestion: http://www.paulgraham.com (any link). > > > > > > > Is it just me or can anybody else get the image and the links to show > > on this site....using Dillo?? All I get is: > > > > "In stores now: Hackers & Painters. > > > > New: Great Hackers (Audio) | The Python Paradox. " > > see attached jpg (dillo-0.8.2-1) Hi Patrick, Please be more careful the next time, I received the image five times (212KB). Don't CC'me, I read the list, and please don't post such large emails to dillo-dev. A simple URL or a direct email should be enough. Cheers Jorge.-

Aug. 17, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]Re: contrast_visited_color

by Patrick Shanahan

* opus(a)milneweb.com <opus(a)milneweb.com> [08-16-04 16:15]: > Jorge Arellano Cid writes: > > A suggestion: http://www.paulgraham.com (any link). > > > > Is it just me or can anybody else get the image and the links to show > on this site....using Dillo?? All I get is: > > "In stores now: Hackers & Painters. > > New: Great Hackers (Audio) | The Python Paradox. " see attached jpg (dillo-0.8.2-1) -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/photos

Aug. 16, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]Re: contrast_visited_color

by Patrick Shanahan

* opus(a)milneweb.com <opus(a)milneweb.com> [08-16-04 16:15]: > Jorge Arellano Cid writes: > > A suggestion: http://www.paulgraham.com (any link). > > > > Is it just me or can anybody else get the image and the links to show > on this site....using Dillo?? All I get is: > > "In stores now: Hackers & Painters. > > New: Great Hackers (Audio) | The Python Paradox. " see attached jpg (dillo-0.8.2-1) -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/photos

Aug. 16, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]Re: contrast_visited_color

by Patrick Shanahan

* opus(a)milneweb.com <opus(a)milneweb.com> [08-16-04 16:15]: > Jorge Arellano Cid writes: > > A suggestion: http://www.paulgraham.com (any link). > > > > Is it just me or can anybody else get the image and the links to show > on this site....using Dillo?? All I get is: > > "In stores now: Hackers & Painters. > > New: Great Hackers (Audio) | The Python Paradox. " see attached jpg (dillo-0.8.2-1) -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/photos

Aug. 16, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]Re: contrast_visited_color

by Thomas-Martin Seck

* opus(a)milneweb.com (opus(a)milneweb.com) > Jorge Arellano Cid writes: > > > > > A suggestion: http://www.paulgraham.com (any link). > > > > Is it just me or can anybody else get the image and the links to show on > this site....using Dillo?? All I get is: Works fine here on FreeBSD with a dillo snapshot from August 12.

Aug. 16, 2004

[Dillo-dev]Re: contrast_visited_color

by opus＠milneweb.com

Jorge Arellano Cid writes: > > A suggestion: http://www.paulgraham.com (any link). > Is it just me or can anybody else get the image and the links to show on this site....using Dillo?? All I get is: "In stores now: Hackers & Painters. New: Great Hackers (Audio) | The Python Paradox. " Nothing else. -- Pete http://milneweb.com http://nomorevirus.com

Aug. 16, 2004

[Dillo-dev]contrast_visited_color

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Hi there, I've been playing with this patch for enough time to start to like its effects. It changes the old 'force_visited_color' dillorc option with 'contrast_visited_color' (featuring a new algorithm). This allows Dillo to choose the visited link color, in such a way that it makes good contrast with the rest of the page. Please update your dillorc with the new option, test it, and say how it works for you. A suggestion: http://www.paulgraham.com (any link). -- Cheers Jorge.-

Aug. 16, 2004

[Dillo-dev]Re: gcc 2.95.4 "compilability" (was: no subject)

by opus＠milneweb.com

Jorge Arellano Cid writes: > The original c99 patch introduced a memory leak, so a fixed > version was commited. > > Yes, we do strive for code compatibility, and this kind of > report is welcomed. > > -- > Cheers > Jorge.- > Thank you for fixing this!! -- Pete http://milneweb.com http://nomorevirus.com

Aug. 15, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev] gcc 2.95.4 "compilability" (was: no subject)

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 11:25:59AM +0200, Thomas-Martin Seck wrote: > * David McKee (dmckee(a)jlab.org) > > > The code that is giving you trouble is valid under the new (1999) standard > > for "c", but invalid under the old (1982? ANSI standard, and under the > > original K&R compiler). Versions of gcc from 3.0 on accept c99 syntax, but > > older versions do not. I imagine that Jorge will get around to cleaning it > > up sooner or later. He has fixed this kind of thing in the past. > > As the current mainainer of the dillo FreeBSD port I hope that the code > stays "gcc 2.95 clean" for some time since FreeBSD uses gcc 2.95.4 as > the system compiler on the 4.x series and 4.x is likely to stay around > for quite a while, even after FreeBSD 5 is declared the "STABLE" > development branch. The original c99 patch introduced a memory leak, so a fixed version was commited. Yes, we do strive for code compatibility, and this kind of report is welcomed. -- Cheers Jorge.-

Aug. 15, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev] gcc 2.95.4 "compilability" (was: no subject)

by Thomas-Martin Seck

* David McKee (dmckee(a)jlab.org) > The code that is giving you trouble is valid under the new (1999) standard > for "c", but invalid under the old (1982? ANSI standard, and under the > original K&R compiler). Versions of gcc from 3.0 on accept c99 syntax, but > older versions do not. I imagine that Jorge will get around to cleaning it > up sooner or later. He has fixed this kind of thing in the past. As the current mainainer of the dillo FreeBSD port I hope that the code stays "gcc 2.95 clean" for some time since FreeBSD uses gcc 2.95.4 as the system compiler on the 4.x series and 4.x is likely to stay around for quite a while, even after FreeBSD 5 is declared the "STABLE" development branch.

Aug. 15, 2004