- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

dillo crash when using a <select> field during page load

by rogutes＠googlemail.com

G'day, When I click on a <select><option>option 1</option>...</select> field and move the mouse through the items while a page is still loading, dillo segfaults. I can quite reliably reproduce this with the country selection field at the top center of lenovo.com. I wasn't able to put together a smaller page which triggers this, but I have attached a full backtrace from gdb. -- -- Rogut?s Sparnuotos

March 21, 2010

patch: drawing image map areas

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 03:55:40PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Johannes wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 02:49:58AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > Johannes wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:54:32PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > > Johannes wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 12:46:57AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > > > > This draws the shapes in image maps, which is quite nice when not > > > > > > > loading images. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are two redrawing problems: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I try http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/ > > > > > > > a little bit of the map is visible at the bottom of the viewport > > > > > > > initially (geometry 850x630). The rectangles are visible, but not > > > > > > > the polygons. If I page down or switch to another desktop and back, > > > > > > > all is well. > > > > > > > > > > > > I think I found the cause of the second drawing issue: > > > > > > > > > > > > It's not specific to polygons, it's just that in the example page > > > > > > the polygons are defined last. > > > > > > The problem is that the shapes are defined after the image, so HTML > > > > > > code way below the definition of the actual image can now influence > > > > > > how the image should be drawn. > > > > > > If by accident the image get's drawn before the image map has been > > > > > > parsed, the shapes are not visible. > > > > > > > > > > > > We need to issue a queueDraw() for each affected image when adding > > > > > > a shape to an image map. The problem is that I think there currently > > > > > > is no reference from image maps to images using the map. > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, I sort of wonder whether I should take it back out. > > > > > It's a somewhat frivolous feature that only I would see, > > > > > and I am reluctant to increase the General Entanglement of Things > > > > > in such a case. > > > > > > > > You are right that we should not add too much complexity for this > > > > special case, but we could do it in a brute force way like this (plus > > > > adding some big comments explaining the issue): > > > > > > Gave it a try and crashed after a bit. When we try to load an image, > > > the DilloImage* in the html list is set to NULL because we have given it > > > to the web. > > > > Ah ok, but we can simply add a check for that case: > > Then we wouldn't have shapes drawn when dillo has requested the image, > but maybe that's all right... Yes, there is this gap, but I'd say it's ok.

March 20, 2010

patch: drawing image map areas

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Johannes wrote: > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 02:49:58AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Johannes wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:54:32PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > Johannes wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 12:46:57AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > > > This draws the shapes in image maps, which is quite nice when not > > > > > > loading images. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are two redrawing problems: > > > > > > > > > > > > If I try http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/ > > > > > > a little bit of the map is visible at the bottom of the viewport > > > > > > initially (geometry 850x630). The rectangles are visible, but not > > > > > > the polygons. If I page down or switch to another desktop and back, > > > > > > all is well. > > > > > > > > > > I think I found the cause of the second drawing issue: > > > > > > > > > > It's not specific to polygons, it's just that in the example page > > > > > the polygons are defined last. > > > > > The problem is that the shapes are defined after the image, so HTML > > > > > code way below the definition of the actual image can now influence > > > > > how the image should be drawn. > > > > > If by accident the image get's drawn before the image map has been > > > > > parsed, the shapes are not visible. > > > > > > > > > > We need to issue a queueDraw() for each affected image when adding > > > > > a shape to an image map. The problem is that I think there currently > > > > > is no reference from image maps to images using the map. > > > > > > > > Hmm, I sort of wonder whether I should take it back out. > > > > It's a somewhat frivolous feature that only I would see, > > > > and I am reluctant to increase the General Entanglement of Things > > > > in such a case. > > > > > > You are right that we should not add too much complexity for this > > > special case, but we could do it in a brute force way like this (plus > > > adding some big comments explaining the issue): > > > > Gave it a try and crashed after a bit. When we try to load an image, > > the DilloImage* in the html list is set to NULL because we have given it > > to the web. > > Ah ok, but we can simply add a check for that case: Then we wouldn't have shapes drawn when dillo has requested the image, but maybe that's all right...

March 20, 2010

patch: drawing image map areas

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 02:49:58AM +0000, corvid wrote: > Johannes wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:54:32PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > Johannes wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 12:46:57AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > > This draws the shapes in image maps, which is quite nice when not > > > > > loading images. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There are two redrawing problems: > > > > > > > > > > If I try http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/ > > > > > a little bit of the map is visible at the bottom of the viewport > > > > > initially (geometry 850x630). The rectangles are visible, but not > > > > > the polygons. If I page down or switch to another desktop and back, > > > > > all is well. > > > > > > > > I think I found the cause of the second drawing issue: > > > > > > > > It's not specific to polygons, it's just that in the example page > > > > the polygons are defined last. > > > > The problem is that the shapes are defined after the image, so HTML > > > > code way below the definition of the actual image can now influence > > > > how the image should be drawn. > > > > If by accident the image get's drawn before the image map has been > > > > parsed, the shapes are not visible. > > > > > > > > We need to issue a queueDraw() for each affected image when adding > > > > a shape to an image map. The problem is that I think there currently > > > > is no reference from image maps to images using the map. > > > > > > Hmm, I sort of wonder whether I should take it back out. > > > It's a somewhat frivolous feature that only I would see, > > > and I am reluctant to increase the General Entanglement of Things > > > in such a case. > > > > You are right that we should not add too much complexity for this > > special case, but we could do it in a brute force way like this (plus > > adding some big comments explaining the issue): > > Gave it a try and crashed after a bit. When we try to load an image, > the DilloImage* in the html list is set to NULL because we have given it > to the web. Ah ok, but we can simply add a check for that case: diff -r 5fafc795ebbd dw/image.hh --- a/dw/image.hh Sat Mar 20 01:55:00 2010 +0000 +++ b/dw/image.hh Sat Mar 20 11:26:02 2010 +0100 @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ void setIsMap (); void setUseMap (ImageMapsList *list, Object *key); + void forceMapRedraw () { if (mapKey && ! buffer) queueDraw (); }; }; } // namespace dw diff -r 5fafc795ebbd src/html.cc --- a/src/html.cc Sat Mar 20 01:55:00 2010 +0000 +++ b/src/html.cc Sat Mar 20 11:26:02 2010 +0100 @@ -2199,6 +2199,12 @@ */ static void Html_tag_close_map(DilloHtml *html, int TagIdx) { + for (int i = 0; i < html->images->size(); i++) { + DilloImage *img = html->images->get(i)->image; + + if (img) + ((dw::Image*) img->dw)->forceMapRedraw(); + } html->InFlags &= ~IN_MAP; } BTW: I found another nice image map example: http://html.cita.uiuc.edu/text/map/map-example.php Cheers, Johannes

March 20, 2010

patch: drawing image map areas

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Johannes wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:54:32PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Johannes wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 12:46:57AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > This draws the shapes in image maps, which is quite nice when not > > > > loading images. > > > > > > > > > > > > There are two redrawing problems: > > > > > > > > If I try http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/ > > > > a little bit of the map is visible at the bottom of the viewport > > > > initially (geometry 850x630). The rectangles are visible, but not > > > > the polygons. If I page down or switch to another desktop and back, > > > > all is well. > > > > > > I think I found the cause of the second drawing issue: > > > > > > It's not specific to polygons, it's just that in the example page > > > the polygons are defined last. > > > The problem is that the shapes are defined after the image, so HTML > > > code way below the definition of the actual image can now influence > > > how the image should be drawn. > > > If by accident the image get's drawn before the image map has been > > > parsed, the shapes are not visible. > > > > > > We need to issue a queueDraw() for each affected image when adding > > > a shape to an image map. The problem is that I think there currently > > > is no reference from image maps to images using the map. > > > > Hmm, I sort of wonder whether I should take it back out. > > It's a somewhat frivolous feature that only I would see, > > and I am reluctant to increase the General Entanglement of Things > > in such a case. > > You are right that we should not add too much complexity for this > special case, but we could do it in a brute force way like this (plus > adding some big comments explaining the issue): Gave it a try and crashed after a bit. When we try to load an image, the DilloImage* in the html list is set to NULL because we have given it to the web.

March 20, 2010

Problem using "Textblock" Class.

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

Hi, On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:26:25AM +0530, Rajesh Marathe wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to implement the support for using the tab or other keyboard > keys to set focus on web page links. As part of this, I started out with > adding a new Class and would like to use some sort of iterator in this > class. I would also like to use the 'Textblock' object to retrieve the > style->x_link for a word. However, when I try to initialize the > Textblock object in my new class, I get a linker error. The details are > as under: > > The basic skeletal code for new class is: > ======================================== > findlinks.cc > > namespace dw { > namespace core { > > FindLinks::FindLinks () > { > widget = NULL; > iterator = NULL; > > } > > FindLinks::~FindLinks () > { > if (iterator) > delete iterator; > } > > void FindLinks::getlink (void) > { > MSG("\n Hi !! I came to findlinks"); > Textblock *textblock = new Textblock (false); > > } > > I have included "dw/textblock.hh" in the above file and also included > core.hh. I guess it's because Textblock is in the dw namespace, not dw::core, so removing "namespace core {" in the above example should fix it. Alternatively you could use "new dw::Textblock (false);". > > Compilation goes through but I end up with a linker error as under: > ===================================================================== > ../dw/libDw-core.a(findlinks.o): In function > `dw::core::FindLinks::getlink()': > /home/rmarathe/dillo-2.2/dw/findlinks.cc:25: undefined reference to > `dw::Textblock::Textblock(bool)' > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > > > I believe that I still need to use "iterator" and the Textblock" classes > to implement this feature. Am I using the Textblock in a right way or am > I missing something in the above code ? > Please do let me know, Hm, I can't really tell from the code above. I would expect some code that uses the existing iterator mechanism to walk through a page and find links and buttons, and so on. Maybe you could use findtext.cc as an example. Regards, Johannes PS: The keyboard navigation feature would be highly appreciated!

March 19, 2010

Problem using "Textblock" Class.

by rmarathe＠i-rode.com

Hi, I am trying to implement the support for using the tab or other keyboard keys to set focus on web page links. As part of this, I started out with adding a new Class and would like to use some sort of iterator in this class. I would also like to use the 'Textblock' object to retrieve the style->x_link for a word. However, when I try to initialize the Textblock object in my new class, I get a linker error. The details are as under: The basic skeletal code for new class is: ======================================== findlinks.cc namespace dw { namespace core { FindLinks::FindLinks () { widget = NULL; iterator = NULL; } FindLinks::~FindLinks () { if (iterator) delete iterator; } void FindLinks::getlink (void) { MSG("\n Hi !! I came to findlinks"); Textblock *textblock = new Textblock (false); } I have included "dw/textblock.hh" in the above file and also included core.hh. Compilation goes through but I end up with a linker error as under: ===================================================================== ../dw/libDw-core.a(findlinks.o): In function `dw::core::FindLinks::getlink()': /home/rmarathe/dillo-2.2/dw/findlinks.cc:25: undefined reference to `dw::Textblock::Textblock(bool)' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status I believe that I still need to use "iterator" and the Textblock" classes to implement this feature. Am I using the Textblock in a right way or am I missing something in the above code ? Please do let me know, regards, Rajesh Marathe.

March 19, 2010

patch: drawing image map areas

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Johannes wrote: > On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:54:32PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Johannes wrote: > > > On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 12:46:57AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > This draws the shapes in image maps, which is quite nice when not > > > > loading images. > > > > > > > > > > > > There are two redrawing problems: > > > > > > > > If I try http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/ > > > > a little bit of the map is visible at the bottom of the viewport > > > > initially (geometry 850x630). The rectangles are visible, but not > > > > the polygons. If I page down or switch to another desktop and back, > > > > all is well. > > > > > > I think I found the cause of the second drawing issue: > > > > > > It's not specific to polygons, it's just that in the example page > > > the polygons are defined last. > > > The problem is that the shapes are defined after the image, so HTML > > > code way below the definition of the actual image can now influence > > > how the image should be drawn. > > > If by accident the image get's drawn before the image map has been > > > parsed, the shapes are not visible. > > > > > > We need to issue a queueDraw() for each affected image when adding > > > a shape to an image map. The problem is that I think there currently > > > is no reference from image maps to images using the map. > > > > Hmm, I sort of wonder whether I should take it back out. > > It's a somewhat frivolous feature that only I would see, > > and I am reluctant to increase the General Entanglement of Things > > in such a case. > > You are right that we should not add too much complexity for this > special case, but we could do it in a brute force way like this (plus > adding some big comments explaining the issue): Yeah, I think I'd be willing to commit that with comments. It occurs to me that programmers...we have the ideas of pointing out bugs, workarounds, explaining complexities -- but I don't know whether I've seen a project keeping track of "this is something that you can consider taking out again if it should cause serious headaches someday". Somewhat related, but perhaps very difficult to see at the time is "This is done in this particular way to fit with what we are given by [something, e.g., gtk], and needn't be kept in this form if what we interface with changes."

March 16, 2010

patch: drawing image map areas

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:54:32PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Johannes wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 12:46:57AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > This draws the shapes in image maps, which is quite nice when not > > > loading images. > > > > > > > > > There are two redrawing problems: > > > > > > If I try http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/ > > > a little bit of the map is visible at the bottom of the viewport > > > initially (geometry 850x630). The rectangles are visible, but not > > > the polygons. If I page down or switch to another desktop and back, > > > all is well. > > > > I think I found the cause of the second drawing issue: > > > > It's not specific to polygons, it's just that in the example page > > the polygons are defined last. > > The problem is that the shapes are defined after the image, so HTML > > code way below the definition of the actual image can now influence > > how the image should be drawn. > > If by accident the image get's drawn before the image map has been > > parsed, the shapes are not visible. > > > > We need to issue a queueDraw() for each affected image when adding > > a shape to an image map. The problem is that I think there currently > > is no reference from image maps to images using the map. > > Hmm, I sort of wonder whether I should take it back out. > It's a somewhat frivolous feature that only I would see, > and I am reluctant to increase the General Entanglement of Things > in such a case. You are right that we should not add too much complexity for this special case, but we could do it in a brute force way like this (plus adding some big comments explaining the issue): diff -r 7aca003dbfca dw/image.hh --- a/dw/image.hh Sun Mar 14 19:09:24 2010 +0000 +++ b/dw/image.hh Tue Mar 16 11:39:25 2010 +0100 @@ -159,6 +159,7 @@ void setIsMap (); void setUseMap (ImageMapsList *list, Object *key); + void forceMapRedraw () { if (mapKey && ! buffer) queueDraw (); }; }; } // namespace dw diff -r 7aca003dbfca src/html.cc --- a/src/html.cc Sun Mar 14 19:09:24 2010 +0000 +++ b/src/html.cc Tue Mar 16 11:39:25 2010 +0100 @@ -2199,6 +2199,11 @@ */ static void Html_tag_close_map(DilloHtml *html, int TagIdx) { + for (int i = 0; i < html->images->size(); i++) { + dw::Image *img = (dw::Image *) html->images->get(i)->image->dw; + + img->forceMapRedraw(); + } html->InFlags &= ~IN_MAP; }

March 16, 2010

patch: drawing image map areas

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Johannes wrote: > On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 12:46:57AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > This draws the shapes in image maps, which is quite nice when not > > loading images. > > > > > > There are two redrawing problems: > > > > If I try http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/ > > a little bit of the map is visible at the bottom of the viewport > > initially (geometry 850x630). The rectangles are visible, but not > > the polygons. If I page down or switch to another desktop and back, > > all is well. > > I think I found the cause of the second drawing issue: > > It's not specific to polygons, it's just that in the example page > the polygons are defined last. > The problem is that the shapes are defined after the image, so HTML > code way below the definition of the actual image can now influence > how the image should be drawn. > If by accident the image get's drawn before the image map has been > parsed, the shapes are not visible. > > We need to issue a queueDraw() for each affected image when adding > a shape to an image map. The problem is that I think there currently > is no reference from image maps to images using the map. Hmm, I sort of wonder whether I should take it back out. It's a somewhat frivolous feature that only I would see, and I am reluctant to increase the General Entanglement of Things in such a case.

March 15, 2010