- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

[patch]: fix .hgignore

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:25:38PM +0100, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 05:01:57PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Jeremy wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 03:28:36PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > Back in July, Jeremy wrote: > > > > > corvid wrote: > > > > > > Jeremy wrote: > > > > > > > The problem was that .hgignore contains a line "dillo", which > > > > > > > ignores every file with the string "dillo" anywhere in its > > > > > > > path. Many other lines in .hgignore are similarly > > > > > > > inappropriate. It looks as though these lines were written to > > > > > > > be interpreted as glob-style patterns, but in fact mercurial > > > > > > > interprets every line as a regexp. > > > > > > > > > > > > Looking in http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hgignore.5.html it > > > > > > seems that specifying "syntax: glob" is also a possibility. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, glob syntax might well be better, but either way the current > > > > > .hgignore is not working as it should and could do with fixing. > > > > > > > > Just noticed this thread while cleaning out old mail, and we should > > > > come to some kind of decision on this. > > > > > > Heh, I was *just* about to bump this discussion by resubmitting my > > > patch! Is there any reason not to push this? Unless people would > > > prefer glob syntax? > > > > My opinion is: Either syntax, as long as it's fixed... > > Also my opinion. OK, I plan to sit on this for a few more days and then push it if there have been no objections. Regards, Jeremy Henty

Nov. 28, 2010

Dillo needs scripting

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 09:28:21PM +0100, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > What's that lua-dpi? It's a small C program that embeds the Lua interpreter and extends its state with a global function called "dpi". I implemented "dpi" by modifying the main() function of the hello DPI filter in the Dillo source. Once lua-dpi has set up the Lua state it takes its first argument as the name of a Lua script which it loads and runs. > Can we have a look at it? It's a patch to the Dillo source. I'm attaching it. I have made it minimally intrusive: the code is in a new directory called dpi/lua and the only changes to existing files are one-liner changes to dpi/Makefile.am (to make the build recurse into the lua subdirectory) and configure.in (to create dpi/lua/Makefile). NB: I have renamed the dpi to "lua" instead of "starurchin", so the URL is now "dpi:/lua/". Also, if you install Dillo to a prefix other than "/usr" you will have to change the #! line of lua.filter.dpi to match (that's a bug that I will fix if this project gets serious). The current API is much too simple to do anything non-trivial. I think the final version will look more like this: dpi(function (request) url = request.url; html = ...; request:reply(html); end); Regards, Jeremy Henty

Nov. 28, 2010

Dillo needs scripting

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 05:05:26PM +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > I thought it would be fun if I could write a DPI filter as easily as > this: > > #!/usr/lib/dillo/bin/lua-dpi > -- -*- lua -*- > > dpi [[ > Content-type: text/html > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN'> > <html> > <head><title>Hello World - Lua DPI</title></head> > <body> > From inside a Dillo DPI, Lua says "Hello World!". > </body> > </html> > ]] > > Well, now I can! > > http://starurchin.org/dillo/dillo_lua_dpi.png > > It's still just a toy at the moment, but I'm pleased with it. Hey nice! What's that lua-dpi? Is it a lua script? Can we have a look at it? Cheers, Johannes

Nov. 27, 2010

[patch]: fix .hgignore

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 05:01:57PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Jeremy wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 03:28:36PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > Back in July, Jeremy wrote: > > > > corvid wrote: > > > > > Jeremy wrote: > > > > > > The problem was that .hgignore contains a line "dillo", which > > > > > > ignores every file with the string "dillo" anywhere in its > > > > > > path. Many other lines in .hgignore are similarly > > > > > > inappropriate. It looks as though these lines were written to > > > > > > be interpreted as glob-style patterns, but in fact mercurial > > > > > > interprets every line as a regexp. > > > > > > > > > > Looking in http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hgignore.5.html it > > > > > seems that specifying "syntax: glob" is also a possibility. > > > > > > > > Yes, glob syntax might well be better, but either way the current > > > > .hgignore is not working as it should and could do with fixing. > > > > > > Just noticed this thread while cleaning out old mail, and we should > > > come to some kind of decision on this. > > > > Heh, I was *just* about to bump this discussion by resubmitting my > > patch! Is there any reason not to push this? Unless people would > > prefer glob syntax? > > My opinion is: Either syntax, as long as it's fixed... Also my opinion. Cheers, Johannes

Nov. 27, 2010

[patch]: fix .hgignore

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jeremy wrote: > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 03:28:36PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Back in July, Jeremy wrote: > > > corvid wrote: > > > > Jeremy wrote: > > > > > The problem was that .hgignore contains a line "dillo", which > > > > > ignores every file with the string "dillo" anywhere in its > > > > > path. Many other lines in .hgignore are similarly > > > > > inappropriate. It looks as though these lines were written to > > > > > be interpreted as glob-style patterns, but in fact mercurial > > > > > interprets every line as a regexp. > > > > > > > > Looking in http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hgignore.5.html it > > > > seems that specifying "syntax: glob" is also a possibility. > > > > > > Yes, glob syntax might well be better, but either way the current > > > .hgignore is not working as it should and could do with fixing. > > > > Just noticed this thread while cleaning out old mail, and we should > > come to some kind of decision on this. > > Heh, I was *just* about to bump this discussion by resubmitting my > patch! Is there any reason not to push this? Unless people would > prefer glob syntax? My opinion is: Either syntax, as long as it's fixed...

Nov. 27, 2010

[patch]: fix .hgignore

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 03:28:36PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Back in July, Jeremy wrote: > > corvid wrote: > > > Jeremy wrote: > > > > The problem was that .hgignore contains a line "dillo", which > > > > ignores every file with the string "dillo" anywhere in its > > > > path. Many other lines in .hgignore are similarly > > > > inappropriate. It looks as though these lines were written to > > > > be interpreted as glob-style patterns, but in fact mercurial > > > > interprets every line as a regexp. > > > > > > Looking in http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hgignore.5.html it > > > seems that specifying "syntax: glob" is also a possibility. > > > > Yes, glob syntax might well be better, but either way the current > > .hgignore is not working as it should and could do with fixing. > > Just noticed this thread while cleaning out old mail, and we should > come to some kind of decision on this. Heh, I was *just* about to bump this discussion by resubmitting my patch! Is there any reason not to push this? Unless people would prefer glob syntax? Regards, Jeremy Henty

Nov. 27, 2010

[patch]: fix .hgignore

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Back in July, Jeremy wrote: > corvid wrote: > > Jeremy wrote: > > > The problem was that .hgignore contains a line "dillo", which > > > ignores every file with the string "dillo" anywhere in its path. > > > Many other lines in .hgignore are similarly inappropriate. It > > > looks as though these lines were written to be interpreted as > > > glob-style patterns, but in fact mercurial interprets every line > > > as a regexp. > > > > Looking in http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/hgignore.5.html it seems > > that specifying "syntax: glob" is also a possibility. > > Yes, glob syntax might well be better, but either way the current > .hgignore is not working as it should and could do with fixing. Just noticed this thread while cleaning out old mail, and we should come to some kind of decision on this.

Nov. 27, 2010

Dillo needs scripting

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

I thought it would be fun if I could write a DPI filter as easily as this: #!/usr/lib/dillo/bin/lua-dpi -- -*- lua -*- dpi [[ Content-type: text/html <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC '-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN'> <html> <head><title>Hello World - Lua DPI</title></head> <body> From inside a Dillo DPI, Lua says "Hello World!". </body> </html> ]] Well, now I can! http://starurchin.org/dillo/dillo_lua_dpi.png It's still just a toy at the moment, but I'm pleased with it. Regards, Jeremy Henty

Nov. 26, 2010

[patch]: @media support

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

corvid wrote: > Jeremy wrote: > > + dStrcasecmp(tval, "media") == 0) > > Should that be "screen"? <headdesk/> :-) . Good call! Updated patch attached. Regards, Jeremy Henty

Nov. 23, 2010

[patch]: @media support

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jeremy wrote: > + dStrcasecmp(tval, "media") == 0) Should that be "screen"?

Nov. 22, 2010