- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

is dillo ready for load_background_images=YES in a release?

by eocene＠gmx.com

Johannes wrote: > I guess we don't support this negative text-indent. Did we ever do anything about negative margins? I remember that being brought up in the early stages of css, where it wasn't going to be easy to get dw to deal with it...

April 6, 2014

is dillo ready for load_background_images=YES in a release?

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 02:11:14PM +0000, eocene wrote: > Johannes wrote: > > I'm running dillo with load_background_images=YES for quite a while > > now and I like it more than without it. > > Of course your personal experience heavily depends on what sites > > you go to. > > Do you have some examples wher load_background_images=YES makes > > things worse? > > I just started turning it on regularly for this persistent connections > testing, and had been browsing as much to exercise that code as to > _browse_, so I don't remember much at the moment. But I happen to > remember that the appearance of the top of http://straightdope.com > was dismaying. Interesting. They try to move the text somewhere to the left to make it invisible if CSS is enabled: #header .site_tagline a { display: block; width: 788px; height: 116px; text-indent: -2000px; } I guess we don't support this negative text-indent.

April 6, 2014

is dillo ready for load_background_images=YES in a release?

by eocene＠gmx.com

> Do you have some examples wher load_background_images=YES makes > things worse? About halfway down the page at http://arstechnica.com , there's a picture of a bearded guy, and in hard-to-read gray on the background image there's text like "feature story" and "i had my dna analyzed..." I've noticed how sometimes the top of a background image will be repeated, and wondered why that happens.

April 6, 2014

is dillo ready for load_background_images=YES in a release?

by eocene＠gmx.com

Johannes wrote: > I'm running dillo with load_background_images=YES for quite a while > now and I like it more than without it. > Of course your personal experience heavily depends on what sites > you go to. > Do you have some examples wher load_background_images=YES makes > things worse? I just started turning it on regularly for this persistent connections testing, and had been browsing as much to exercise that code as to _browse_, so I don't remember much at the moment. But I happen to remember that the appearance of the top of http://straightdope.com was dismaying.

April 6, 2014

is dillo ready for load_background_images=YES in a release?

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 05:22:18PM +0000, eocene wrote: > > Once you know that load_background_images can be toggled from the menu, > it's good, but our css/rendering is still incomplete enough that > background images obscure text rather frequently. I think > load_background_images=YES by default may make the experience of > trying out dillo a negative one. I'm running dillo with load_background_images=YES for quite a while now and I like it more than without it. Of course your personal experience heavily depends on what sites you go to. Do you have some examples wher load_background_images=YES makes things worse? Cheers, Johannes

April 6, 2014

is dillo ready for load_background_images=YES in a release?

by eocene＠gmx.com

Once you know that load_background_images can be toggled from the menu, it's good, but our css/rendering is still incomplete enough that background images obscure text rather frequently. I think load_background_images=YES by default may make the experience of trying out dillo a negative one.

April 5, 2014

background images and display:none

by eocene＠gmx.com

Johannes wrote: > On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 05:37:52PM +0000, eocene wrote: > > > > I was checking what was causing the "IO_write, closing with pending data > > not sent" messages with background images, and at least in the case that > > I just dug into, it was due to display:none. Is this considered > > expected behaviour, or a bug, or...? > > The simple case can be prevented with something like in attached > patch. But even with this patch I see quite some of the messages you > mention. So there must be something else going on too. It might be that elements with display:none are fixed now but elements whose ancestors are display:none are still broken.

April 4, 2014

background images and display:none

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 05:37:52PM +0000, eocene wrote: > > I was checking what was causing the "IO_write, closing with pending data > not sent" messages with background images, and at least in the case that > I just dug into, it was due to display:none. Is this considered > expected behaviour, or a bug, or...? An "informative" message. When the socket has already received the request string and has asked the kernel to deliver it, but it has not got out fully yet, and suddenly the socket gets cancelled/aborted, the message is displayed. Whether expected behaviour or a bug, depends on the case. -- Cheers Jorge.-

April 4, 2014

background images and display:none

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 05:37:52PM +0000, eocene wrote: > > I was checking what was causing the "IO_write, closing with pending data > not sent" messages with background images, and at least in the case that > I just dug into, it was due to display:none. Is this considered > expected behaviour, or a bug, or...? The simple case can be prevented with something like in attached patch. But even with this patch I see quite some of the messages you mention. So there must be something else going on too. Cheers, Johannes

April 4, 2014

background images and display:none

by eocene＠gmx.com

I was checking what was causing the "IO_write, closing with pending data not sent" messages with background images, and at least in the case that I just dug into, it was due to display:none. Is this considered expected behaviour, or a bug, or...?

April 4, 2014