- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev] Web pages - compatibility

by Sebastian Geerken

On Thu, Jan 09, Andreas Schweitzer wrote: > Since I'm not quite sure who is maintainig the web pages > I send it here : > The Compatibility page should list the BSD's as follows > >  > > <LI> NetBSD (in pkgsrc) > <li> FreeBSD (in the ports) > <li> OpenBSD (in the ports) > >  > > I.e. OpenBSD certainly is not restricted to Version 2.9. Also > the phrases in the parantheses mean something to BSD users :-) > (essentially that dillo is part of the OS in a broader sense). > > Also, for the handhelds : NetBSD has binaries for the > StrongARM and the MIPS based handhelds on their ftp sites. Done. I also added a section in the "Packages" section, on the "Download" page. Sebastian

Jan. 18, 2003

hi

by Andrés Mujica - Linux SEAQ

i want to share with all of u this article.. sorry if it was already reported... http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/695/ by the way, dillo is a great, great browser.. is the one i use all time..

Jan. 18, 2003

Re: Dillo-dev -- confirmation of subscription -- request 535129

by Pierre Maon

On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 13:41:33 +0100 dillo-dev-request(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de wrote: > Dillo-dev -- confirmation of subscription -- request 535129 > > We have received a request from 80.200.16.25 for subscription of your > email address, <pierre.maon(a)skynet.be>, to the > dillo-dev(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de mailing list. To confirm the > request, please send a message to > dillo-dev-request(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de, and either: > > - maintain the subject line as is (the reply's additional "Re:" is > ok), > > - or include the following line - and only the following line - in the > message body: > > confirm 535129 > > (Simply sending a 'reply' to this message should work from most email > interfaces, since that usually leaves the subject line in the right > form.) > > If you do not wish to subscribe to this list, please simply disregard > this message. Send questions to > dillo-dev-admin(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de. >

Jan. 18, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Freshmeat article

by Sebastian Geerken

Hi Livio, On Sat, Jan 18, Livio Baldini Soares wrote: > Dillo has a section on an article about Lightweight Browsers: > http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/695/ > > Maybe someone could add this to the "Dillo In The Press!" section. Done. I don't know how Jorge sorts them, I assume that it is done by relevance. Sebastian

Jan. 18, 2003

Freshmeat article

by Livio Baldini Soares

Hi all, Dillo has a section on an article about Lightweight Browsers: http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/695/ Maybe someone could add this to the "Dillo In The Press!" section. best regards, -- Livio <livio(a)ime.usp.br>

Jan. 18, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] cvs not compiling ?

by Nicola Girardi

Sebastian Geerken wrote: > configure should probably not be part of the CVS. Along with other files, as I suggested some time ago, but nobody replied. :-(

Jan. 18, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] cvs not compiling ?

by slymer＠slymer.org

On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 10:33:50 +0100 Jan Stary <jsta6559(a)artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> wrote: > creating cache ./config.cache > ./configure: line 549: syntax error near unexpected token > `src/dillo.c'./configure: line 549: > `AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(src/dillo.c)' make: *** [config.status] > Error 2 I have finally fixed the damn thing. The configure.in files was faulty. Here's what's fixed in the file: AC_INIT([src/dillo.c]) dnl AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR([src/dillo.c]) and <oneline> dnl AC_CONFIG_FILES([Makefile doc/Makefile src/Makefile src/IO/Makefile]) </oneline> <oneline> AC_OUTPUT([Makefile doc/Makefile src/Makefile src/IO/Makefile]) </oneline> Happy compiling! But the question of "Who broke the configure.in file?!" still stands :> PS: if you are really picky, you could modify the AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE line to reflect the real version: AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE(dillo, 0.7.0-pre) -- People tend to make rules for others and exceptions for themselves. Registered Linux user #298569

Jan. 17, 2003

Web pages - Download/Packages

by Kelson Vibber

On a similar note to the compatibility updates, I'd like to I'd like to bring up the Red Hat RPMs I've posted at http://www.hyperborea.org/software/dillo.html I don't know how many people have tried them out, but if the consensus is favorable, I'd like to be listed under the Packages section. Thanks. -- Kelson Vibber kelson(a)pobox.com http://www.hyperborea.org/ Creative Writing - Photography - The Flash

Jan. 17, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Web pages - compatibility

by Sebastian Geerken

On Thu, Jan 09, Andreas Schweitzer wrote: > Since I'm not quite sure who is maintainig the web pages > I send it here : > The Compatibility page should list the BSD's as follows > >  > > <LI> NetBSD (in pkgsrc) > <li> FreeBSD (in the ports) > <li> OpenBSD (in the ports) > >  > > I.e. OpenBSD certainly is not restricted to Version 2.9. Also > the phrases in the parantheses mean something to BSD users :-) > (essentially that dillo is part of the OS in a broader sense). Done. (I have, of course, write access on the directory ;-) > Also, for the handhelds : NetBSD has binaries for the > StrongARM and the MIPS based handhelds on their ftp sites. Currently inaccessable. I'll try it later. Sebastian

Jan. 17, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] cvs not compiling ?

by Sebastian Geerken

On Fri, Jan 17, slymer(a)slymer.org wrote: > > I'm having trouble compiling from CVS. After I get all the files > updated, I do a ./configure, and after that a make. I get this: > > [...] configure should probably not be part of the CVS. Currently, following workaround helps: rm configure cvs -d:pserver:anonymous@auriga.wearlab.de:/sfhome/cvs/dillo update configure touch configure Then type "./configure && make", as usual. Sebastian

Jan. 17, 2003