- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev] Re: configuration patch - Fix for bugs 386, 407, 392, 412 and notes on bugs 349, 408

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Andreas, (and /usr/local savvy guys!) > > Please tell me how things have gone. Basically I'm waiting for > > these issues to be solved to make the 0.7.2 release. > > With the current version it does no longer work *quite* out of > the box on the BSD's. It will work when doing a > CPPFLAGS=/usr/local/include LDFLAGS=/usr/local/lib ./configure > but this is not what I call out of the box :-). I'm not an expert in tunning the system's directories, but I wonder why if /usr/local has part of the system, it is not included in the search path in BSDs. Doesn't make sense to me (nut I don't know much here). OTOH, for instance, /usr/local is not a part of the system in Slackware, and I can't find it with: `gcc -print-search-dirs`. Doubts started when I received this mail, from Manuel Menal: [mmenal at hurdfr.org] <q> Hey, While porting Dillo to the new implementation of POSIX threads for GNU/Hurd (code name: "Rubbish, I asked for mine with Minced Garlic, Please Take this back"), I found some minor bugs in the Dillo "installation system". The first bug I found out was a bug that was already reported as #349 in the Dillo bug report system. It seems a quite simple and not so annoying bug, but in fact it is quite pervert, as it makes the configure misdetect what is installed in the system: when it checks for jpeglib.h (& others), it tries to preprocess a simple C file which only includes jpeglib.h, and check if there is some output. If there is some output, then it assumes there is no jpeglib.h. Which is not true in this case: the output is just warning of cpp, which complains about the -I/usr/local/include (cpp 3.1 already has /usr/local/include it its system directories). [...] </q> Thinking that /usr/local was for extensions, I decided to remove the forced include from configure.in. Can anyone shed some light on this topic? > Also, if png.h is on libpng/png.h and NOT as well in png.h, > it will complain, it does not find png.h. However, this warning > is misleading, since configure will find everything just fine > and dillo compiles and works just fine. I understand. > I attach a patch which fixes both problems. > > The /usr/local stuff really only is an issue for gcc3.x since > gcc3.x already has /usr/local as default directories, so I test > for that case. That *should* be ok. (explained above) > The png.h stuff is more or less my original solution :-) ... > there was a reason for that convoluted approach ... :-) Yes, I added the break clause because it tested libpng twice and added two "-lpng" in my system. I'll commit the patch as you sent here (which BTW, includes the "break"). Cheers Jorge.-

April 10, 2003

Missing favorite features

by Niklas Höglund

One feature that's available in the Gecko-based browsers that I like a lot is to be able to select a link by typing the first letters of it. This enables completely "rodent-free" navigation. (In dillo I can't even find a key to go "back".) I just thought I'd check if this is on the radar. I'd also like to "me too" on the issue of connecting dillo to external applications for unknown filetypes and protocols. I don't think dillo should handle ftp, for example, or PDF. gftp and xpdf should do that. However, I think something more than "nothing" should happen when you click on something unsupported... Anyway, nice work making a light-weight browser. I use dillo a lot on my handheld, and even sometimes on my desktop machine. -- Niklas

April 10, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] OpenBSD-3.3 and -current and G_DNS_THREADED

by Dan Weeks

>>>>> "CP" == "Chris Palmer" <chris(a)nodewarrior.org>: CP> On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: CP> CP> [Threading problem on OpenBSD] CP> >> Is this a problem with _all_ OpenBSD? CP> CP> No, it's new. I'm using OBSD 3.1-stable with Dillo and did not have the CP> problem Dan reported. Indeed this is the case. Threads underwent an overhaul on 3.2-current and what will be the 3.3 release will have this issue. I'd be fine with the configure option as it's probably cleaner and easier to maintain. -dan

April 10, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Re: configuration patch - Fix for bugs 386, 407, 392, 412 and notes on bugs 349, 408

by Andreas Schweitzer

Hi, > > > I just commited a minor change to the new configure.in. It > > > avoids running AC_CHECK_LIB twice when testing png headers. I > > > hope it is the right thing to do! :) Well, sort of. See below. > > I'll check it out and test it on a bunch of systems. The testing will > > probably take a while, but I won't be able to do it on the weekend :-) > > *Maybe* before. > > Please tell me how things have gone. Basically I'm waiting for > these issues to be solved to make the 0.7.2 release. With the current version it does no longer work *quite* out of the box on the BSD's. It will work when doing a CPPFLAGS=/usr/local/include LDFLAGS=/usr/local/lib ./configure but this is not what I call out of the box :-). Also, if png.h is on libpng/png.h and NOT as well in png.h, it will complain, it does not find png.h. However, this warning is misleading, since configure will find everything just fine and dillo compiles and works just fine. I attach a patch which fixes both problems. The /usr/local stuff really only is an issue for gcc3.x since gcc3.x already has /usr/local as default directories, so I test for that case. That *should* be ok. The png.h stuff is more or less my original solution :-) ... there was a reason for that convoluted approach ... :-) > Has anyone else tested the changes this mail's subject alludes? Yes, please, so far I tested on FreeBSD 4.7 with gcc2.95 and some Linux variants. I'll test OpenBSD later (but that should be ok ...). But if somebody has some other systems, do test ! FreeBSD 5.0 anyone ? Cheers Andreas P.S.: "full-screen" may indeed be misleading - maybe all of us got used to what it means :-) -- **************************** NEW ADDRESS ****************************** Hamburger Sternwarte Universitaet Hamburg Gojenbergsweg 112 Tel. ++49 40 42891 4016 D-21029 Hamburg, Germany Fax. ++49 40 42891 4198

April 10, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] OpenBSD-3.3 and -current and G_DNS_THREADED

by Andreas Schweitzer

On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 07:27:37PM +0200, Victor Sahlstedt wrote: > On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:06:26 -0400 (CLT) > Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)softhome.net> wrote: > > > Is this a problem with _all_ OpenBSD? > > Well, no. It only applies to 3.3 and -current, as he stated. > I'm running OpenBSD 3.2 without any problems. I recall the same for 3.2 > 3.3 will be officially released on May 1 though and as the > majority of users most likely will upgrade it'll be a problem. Well, yes and no. It will not be a problem for users of the ports version, since the ports version disables threaded DNS lookups. This has to be done since not all architectures are as thread safe as i386 (and now even i386 fails here ;-) ). Thanks to Damien for pointing this out to me some weeks ago ! So, it will only be a problem for OpenBSD users of the CVS version. Cheers, Andreas -- **************************** NEW ADDRESS ****************************** Hamburger Sternwarte Universitaet Hamburg Gojenbergsweg 112 Tel. ++49 40 42891 4016 D-21029 Hamburg, Germany Fax. ++49 40 42891 4198

April 10, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Re: Dillo pathces

by Victor Sahlstedt

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 10:46:20 -0400 (CLT) Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)softhome.net> wrote: > Well, I think the text for "full-screen" and "Url-box" tooltips > is OK, and as no-one else commented on it, I think they agree. In my opinion, "full-screen" is somewhat misleading. I'd prefer "toggle toolbar on/off" or perhaps "show/hide toolbar". - Victor

April 10, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] OpenBSD-3.3 and -current and G_DNS_THREADED

by Victor Sahlstedt

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:06:26 -0400 (CLT) Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)softhome.net> wrote: > Is this a problem with _all_ OpenBSD? Well, no. It only applies to 3.3 and -current, as he stated. I'm running OpenBSD 3.2 without any problems. 3.3 will be officially released on May 1 though and as the majority of users most likely will upgrade it'll be a problem. - Victor

April 10, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Re: Dillo pathces

by Melvin Hadasht

Hi Kelson, on Thu, 10 Apr 2003 09:51:56 -0700 Kelson Vibber <kelson(a)pobox.com> wrote: > At 07:46 AM 4/10/2003, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > Well, I think the text for "full-screen" and "Url-box" tooltips > >is OK, and as no-one else commented on it, I think they agree. > > Actually, I think that the "full-screen" wording *does* need to be > changed. I never commented on the suggestion because it seemed obvious to > me, and "me too" isn't usually constructive feedback. Full-window? Actually, this is how it is called in dillo --help. Kenavo (Breton: Goodbye) -- Melvin Hadasht

April 10, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Re: Dillo pathces

by Kelson Vibber

At 07:46 AM 4/10/2003, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > Well, I think the text for "full-screen" and "Url-box" tooltips >is OK, and as no-one else commented on it, I think they agree. Actually, I think that the "full-screen" wording *does* need to be changed. I never commented on the suggestion because it seemed obvious to me, and "me too" isn't usually constructive feedback. Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

April 10, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] OpenBSD-3.3 and -current and G_DNS_THREADED

by Chris Palmer

On Thu, 10 Apr 2003, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: [Threading problem on OpenBSD] > Is this a problem with _all_ OpenBSD? No, it's new. I'm using OBSD 3.1-stable with Dillo and did not have the problem Dan reported. -- Chris music is what numbers feel like San Francisco, CA

April 10, 2003