- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev] Can't compile 0.7.2 with alternate icons

by Thorben Thuermer

On Sun, 4 May 2003 00:30:39 -0400 Todd Slater <dontodd(a)columbus.rr.com> wrote: > I was able to build 0.7.1 with the ximian and kde icons; however, when I > try to do the same with 0.7.2 I get: > > interface.c: In function `Interface_add_full_screen_button': > interface.c:648: `full_screen_on_xpm' undeclared (first use in this > function) > I browsed the last couple of months of archives and couldn't find > anything on this there. Any ideas? a new icon was added, which was not yet added to the alternate icon sets (the button for "full screen" mode). you can simply copy&paste the definition for "full_screen_on_xpm" and "full_screen_off_xpm" from the old pixmaps file into the kde one to fix it. > Thanks, > Todd Greetings Thorben Thuermer

May 4, 2003

Can't compile 0.7.2 with alternate icons

by Todd Slater

First off thanks for this great browser! I was able to build 0.7.1 with the ximian and kde icons; however, when I try to do the same with 0.7.2 I get: interface.c: In function `Interface_add_full_screen_button': interface.c:648: `full_screen_on_xpm' undeclared (first use in this function) interface.c:648: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once interface.c:648: for each function it appears in.) interface.c: In function `a_Interface_browser_window_new': interface.c:824: `full_screen_off_xpm' undeclared (first use in this function) make[3]:*** [interface.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/todd/dillo-0.7.2/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/todd/dillo-0.7.2/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/todd/dillo-0.7.2' make: *** [all] Error 2 I browsed the last couple of months of archives and couldn't find anything on this there. Any ideas? Thanks, Todd

May 4, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo-0.7.2 release

by Joe Hill

<snip> > > as this one can be problematic, how about shift middle click > to do the paste? and how about middle click in the status bar > and/or in any part of the toolbar, minus the location bar that > should do the normal paste always I think that would be a fair compromise :)

May 4, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo-0.7.2 release

by higuita

On Sat, 3 May 2003 01:35:03 -0400, Joe Hill <joehill(a)sympatico.ca> wrote: > On Fri, 2 May 2003 16:35:08 -0400 > Paul Pelzl <pelzlpj(a)eecs.umich.edu> wrote: > clipboard" should be the standard. As far as the "middle click to drag", > only people without a wheelmouse would miss that, and in my opinion, i have mouses with wheel and without and love the click&drag in both kind of mouse i like also the wheel for many things, but for browsing i prefer the drag, specially in pages that i also need horizontal scrool this is a thing that i miss when i have to use mozilla > dragging some web pages is, well, a drag. For a page like Slashdot, > that's a lot of "drag, pick up mouse, drag, pick up mouse, ..." well i think the same about the wheel, rolling the wheel for lot of time to reach the other end... but most of the time we only do small drags, just like small wheel rolling > > > A great replacement feature (IMO) would be to replicate Mozilla's > > > behavior only when the user middle-clicks directly on the location > > > bar. It's intuitive, and it shouldn't get in the way of Dillo's > > > nifty middle-button-drag panning. as this one can be problematic, how about shift middle click to do the paste? and how about middle click in the status bar and/or in any part of the toolbar, minus the location bar that should do the normal paste always higuita -- Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country. -- Hermann Goering, Nazi and war criminal, 1883-1946

May 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Suggested mouse short-cuts

by higuita

On Sat, 3 May 2003 01:54:14 -0400, Joe Hill <joehill(a)sympatico.ca> wrote: > well, obsolete. I almost never use them, since I just open everything in > a new tab/browser, then close it when I am done with it. With Galeon or i also rarely use the back and forward, the open in a new windows is very fast and more usefull in dillo i almost only use the back action when i miss click in one link or want to go to some index to bookmark the page higuita -- Naturally the common people don't want war... but after all it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country. -- Hermann Goering, Nazi and war criminal, 1883-1946

May 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo-0.7.2 release

by Joe Hill

On Sat, 03 May 2003 09:30:35 +0300 Jyri Jokinen <shared(a)surffi.net> wrote: > On Sat, May 03, 2003 at 01:35:03 -0400, Joe Hill wrote: > > As far as the "middle click to drag", only people without a > > wheelmouse would miss that, and in my opinion, dragging some web > > pages is, well, a drag. For a page like Slashdot, that's a lot of > > "drag, pick up mouse, drag, pick up mouse, ..." > > But you are forgotting horizontal dragging alltogether! > > The "hold button 2" -drag is one of the key points of Dillos mouse > useability. One can even look at a big screenshot in a small window > easily and quickly, something no other browser seems to enable. very true! and as I pointed out in an earlier thread, I am thrilled that I can now use my mouse wheel to scroll sideways, which as you say, no other browser will do. sorry, but I just love the middle-click to URL too much to give up the fight, I really hope this at least becomes an option in Dillo. you have to admit that viewing huge screenshots is going to be a less-regular occurrence than would justify a hard-coded feature like that. It's _nice_ but not as easily justifiable as loading a URL which happens to some of us hundreds of times daily. > > -- > shared > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev

May 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo-0.7.2 release

by Jyri Jokinen

On Sat, May 03, 2003 at 01:35:03 -0400, Joe Hill wrote: > As far as the "middle click to drag", only people without a wheelmouse > would miss that, and in my opinion, dragging some web pages is, well, > a drag. For a page like Slashdot, that's a lot of "drag, pick up > mouse, drag, pick up mouse, ..." But you are forgotting horizontal dragging alltogether! The "hold button 2" -drag is one of the key points of Dillos mouse useability. One can even look at a big screenshot in a small window easily and quickly, something no other browser seems to enable. -- shared

May 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Suggested mouse short-cuts

by Joe Hill

On Fri, 02 May 2003 15:51:18 -0000 William Trenker <wdtrenker(a)yahoo.ca> wrote: When I first read this suggestion, I thought "oh god, another fancy mouse trick for a simple web browser", but now that I think of it, that would be kinda cool, kinda like the one "ctrl-mousewheeldown=back, ctrl-mousewheelup=forward. My only contention though, is that the forward and back buttons or their equivalent shortcut(s) are becoming, well, obsolete. I almost never use them, since I just open everything in a new tab/browser, then close it when I am done with it. With Galeon or it's like, this can be a memory/cpu hog, but I don't think you would see that problem with Dillo as it is just so damned light (I know Dillo doesn't have tabs, but many window managers now support "grouping", and cycling through the group with the mousewheel, a la my personal fav, Pekwm). I would be interested to see a "poll" of how many people really do rely on the forward and back actions. > On Fri, 2 May 2003 15:41:25-0400, Paul Pelzl W> <pelzlpj(a)eecs.umich.edu> > > wrote: > > > I like the idea, but would this cause problems for people using > > two-button mice in emulated three-button mode? I would think that > > both of these shortcuts could be interpreted as middle clicks... > > > > Actually, I have already been using these mouse short-cuts with an > emulated third-button mouse and Opera. The Opera browser has the same > mouse button shortcuts I'm suggesting for Dillo; that's where I got > the idea. It doesn't confuse the emulated middle-button function > because you are clicking and holding one mouse button before clicking > the other button; there is a slight time delay. It doesn't take long > to get the right feel for it and the reward is really snappy > navigation through the page history. > > (I should have given Opera credit for the idea in my first message, > but I was concerned that the Dillo developers would think I was > proposing the implementation of Opera's much more complex 'mouse > gestures'. I'm not suggesting that, just a couple of relatively > simple mouse key combinations that gives a very worthwhile benefit and > that fits in with the Dillo objective for speed.) > > Bill > > > -- > Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: > http://www.opera.com/m2/ > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev

May 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo-0.7.2 release

by Joe Hill

On Fri, 2 May 2003 16:35:08 -0400 Paul Pelzl <pelzlpj(a)eecs.umich.edu> wrote: > On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 03:36:21PM -0400, Paul Pelzl wrote: > > On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 08:32:03PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > > > On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Joe Hill wrote: > > > > > Oh, but one little thing, it would be nice to be able to > > > > > middle-click on the browser to load a URL, but I'll wait for > > > > > that, hell I didn't even look for a TODO. > > > > > > Currently, button 2 is bound to dragging, which some people find > > > quite useful. Personally, I'm nearly satisfied with "Clear URL" > > > button, pasting into the entry, and pressing enter. Perhaps these > > > three actions could be shortcut to pressing button 2 in the "Clear > > > URL" button (of course, the tooltip should then make this clear). > > > > > > (BTW, I was not aware of this feature in Netscape, until there was > > > a similar thread on this list, some time ago :-) > > > > It's a bit of a misfeature, if you ask me. In Mozilla (as in > > Dillo), I often middle-click to open links in a new window or tab. > > If I miss the link by a pixel or two, suddenly the current Mozilla > > window is trying to load whatever happened to be in the clipboard. > > It is a standard feature that I would bet dollars to doughnuts millions of people use with Mozilla, Galeon, Skipstone, etc. etc. etc. Since "open link in new window/tab" can be easily configured according to the users prefs (alt-middle-click, or even just "always open link in new browser/tab" which is my personal fav), the"middle click loads URL in clipboard" should be the standard. As far as the "middle click to drag", only people without a wheelmouse would miss that, and in my opinion, dragging some web pages is, well, a drag. For a page like Slashdot, that's a lot of "drag, pick up mouse, drag, pick up mouse, ..." One question linking this issue to the coding of apps in general, where "bloat" is an issue, does offering a greater variety of config options contribute to said "bloat"? If not, then all of this could be settled by building in options for the user to choose themselves, whether at build time or in the prefs dialogue. Of course all of this is "IMHO" ;) > > A great replacement feature (IMO) would be to replicate Mozilla's > > behavior only when the user middle-clicks directly on the location > > bar. It's intuitive, and it shouldn't get in the way of Dillo's > > nifty middle-button-drag panning. > > On second thought, that would certainly cause confusion if the > location bar is already focused. Nevermind. > > Middle-clicking the Clear URL button would be nice. > > Paul > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev

May 3, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] dillo-0.7.2 release

by Paul Pelzl

On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 03:36:21PM -0400, Paul Pelzl wrote: > On Fri, May 02, 2003 at 08:32:03PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > > On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Joe Hill wrote: > > > > Oh, but one little thing, it would be nice to be able to middle-click > > > > on the browser to load a URL, but I'll wait for that, hell I didn't > > > > even look for a TODO. > > > > Currently, button 2 is bound to dragging, which some people find quite > > useful. Personally, I'm nearly satisfied with "Clear URL" button, > > pasting into the entry, and pressing enter. Perhaps these three > > actions could be shortcut to pressing button 2 in the "Clear URL" > > button (of course, the tooltip should then make this clear). > > > > (BTW, I was not aware of this feature in Netscape, until there was a > > similar thread on this list, some time ago :-) > > It's a bit of a misfeature, if you ask me. In Mozilla (as in Dillo), I > often middle-click to open links in a new window or tab. If I miss the > link by a pixel or two, suddenly the current Mozilla window is trying to > load whatever happened to be in the clipboard. > > A great replacement feature (IMO) would be to replicate Mozilla's > behavior only when the user middle-clicks directly on the location bar. > It's intuitive, and it shouldn't get in the way of Dillo's nifty > middle-button-drag panning. On second thought, that would certainly cause confusion if the location bar is already focused. Nevermind. Middle-clicking the Clear URL button would be nice. Paul

May 2, 2003