- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

[patch]: fix image logging messages

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

This patch just tweaks the image debugging messages. It fixes the reported function names (currently a_*_new is reported as *_new) and enforces a consistent format. Regards, Jeremy Henty

May 11, 2009

Nav_repush() is hurting valgrind

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 01:47:56PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > AFAIS, it was made by Johannes, corvid and you? Just to give due > credit in the ChangeLog. It was sent to me a while back by either Johannes or corvid, I'm afraid I forget which. No credit is due to me as I used it exactly as it was given to me. Regards, Jeremy Henty

May 11, 2009

Nav_repush() is hurting valgrind

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

Replying to myself. On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 08:20:09AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > Here are two more that show the same thing. With a vanilla dillo > they leak DilloImages. The imgref patch that I attached earlier > fixes the leaks. > > http://stephenlaw.blogspot.com/2009/05/careful-how-you-use-bogus.html > http://www.nybooks.com/articles/22694 And they are now leak-free after pulling the latest tip. Awesome! Jeremy Henty

May 11, 2009

Nav_repush() is hurting valgrind

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 01:53:34PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 08:20:09AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > I've attached the valgrind logs. The "__0.txt" versions are from > > the vanilla repo. The others are after applying the imgref patch. > > No other patches were applied. > > I see "bogus_log.txt" has a SIGSEGV. Ignore that. I accidentally overwrote the original log while I was fixing problems due to my image tracing code interacting badly with recent changes. (That was also almost certainly the cause of the burst of valgrind errors on the 9th, so ignore those too.) Regards, Jeremy Henty

May 11, 2009

change FLTK scheme for in dillo2

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 12:37:50AM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Thu, May 07, 2009 at 03:44:19PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > IL'dar wrote: > > > Can I change colours of dialogues and scrollbar in dillo2? > > > I would like to gets something less bright. > > > Even something like fluid2's -bg option will be ok. > > > > Not currently. > > > > I would not necessarily be opposed to making ui_fg and ui_bg prefs and > > adding a bunch of [class]::default_style->[whatever]color() > > to dillo.cc, although I wouldn't be surprised if we ran into our > > share of places where fltk hardcodes things to, say, GRAY75. > > What do people think about reading X resources as in attached patch > (mainly copied from commented fltk2 code)? > It allows to specify e.g. > > dillo.background:red > dillo.foreground:white > > in your .Xdefaults Jorge, what do you think about this. I actually like it more and more after using it for some days. Cheers, Johannes

May 11, 2009

whitespace entities inside words

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 04:15:13PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 09:48:35PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 07:35:34PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > Jorge wrote: > > > > On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 03:53:03AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > > Is a whitespace entity inside a word supposed to be > > > > > treated like normal whitespace? > > > > > > > > > > I thought it would be, but first I saw that > > > > > adjacent   ... aren't collapsed, > > > > > then I realized that we are leaving the > > > > > space inside the word instead of calling > > > > > addSpace, and then I saw that PrevWasSPC > > > > > isn't set if the space was at the end of the > > > > > word. > > > > > > > > > > If it's just something that no one ever got > > > > > around to dealing with, I'll make a patch. > > > > > > > > That hits into a deeper problem: the treatment of > > > > whitespace is not well defined inside the textblock yet. > > > > The same problem arises when handling NBSP. There's no > > > > clear definition on how to handle/flag it. > > > > If you're willing to study the textblock word wrapping, > > > > and the whitespace problem, great! I think the next big > > > > step for dillo is to handle DIV as a floating word (so it > > > > can be rendered side by side, as intended), and AFAIS that > > > > needs changes in the textblock. > > > > This is a task for 2.2. > > > > > > I have some Textblock code around to fix "white-space: nowrap" > > > (which shows up a lot on wikipedia, where the category stuff > > > at the bottoms of pages is displayed badly) > > > that I've been saving for discussion after this release. > > > I have absolutely no clue about floating, though, and have > > > been hoping that Johannes will develop an interest in it :) > > > > > > > Actually I've also been waiting for someone else to step up :) > > Sebastian told me long ago it could take him a week or so to > add this in the textblock, and that he was going to do it. > Unofortunately, having no news of him, it looks like I'll have to > dive into it at some point in time. > > I remember doing this with table rendering algorithms, and it > took months, but the end result was worth the effort. If somebody > here wants to help along the way, it'd be more than welcomed. I guess there will be some trouble with the redraw optimization I added to Textblock some time ago. I'll be happy to help to make this work with floats. Cheers, Johannes

May 10, 2009

whitespace entities inside words

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 09:48:35PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 07:35:34PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Jorge wrote: > > > On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 03:53:03AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > Is a whitespace entity inside a word supposed to be > > > > treated like normal whitespace? > > > > > > > > I thought it would be, but first I saw that > > > > adjacent   ... aren't collapsed, > > > > then I realized that we are leaving the > > > > space inside the word instead of calling > > > > addSpace, and then I saw that PrevWasSPC > > > > isn't set if the space was at the end of the > > > > word. > > > > > > > > If it's just something that no one ever got > > > > around to dealing with, I'll make a patch. > > > > > > That hits into a deeper problem: the treatment of > > > whitespace is not well defined inside the textblock yet. > > > The same problem arises when handling NBSP. There's no > > > clear definition on how to handle/flag it. > > > If you're willing to study the textblock word wrapping, > > > and the whitespace problem, great! I think the next big > > > step for dillo is to handle DIV as a floating word (so it > > > can be rendered side by side, as intended), and AFAIS that > > > needs changes in the textblock. > > > This is a task for 2.2. > > > > I have some Textblock code around to fix "white-space: nowrap" > > (which shows up a lot on wikipedia, where the category stuff > > at the bottoms of pages is displayed badly) > > that I've been saving for discussion after this release. > > I have absolutely no clue about floating, though, and have > > been hoping that Johannes will develop an interest in it :) > > > > Actually I've also been waiting for someone else to step up :) Sebastian told me long ago it could take him a week or so to add this in the textblock, and that he was going to do it. Unofortunately, having no news of him, it looks like I'll have to dive into it at some point in time. I remember doing this with table rendering algorithms, and it took months, but the end result was worth the effort. If somebody here wants to help along the way, it'd be more than welcomed. -- Cheers Jorge.-

May 10, 2009

whitespace entities inside words

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 07:35:34PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Jorge wrote: > > On Fri, May 08, 2009 at 03:53:03AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > Is a whitespace entity inside a word supposed to be > > > treated like normal whitespace? > > > > > > I thought it would be, but first I saw that > > > adjacent   ... aren't collapsed, > > > then I realized that we are leaving the > > > space inside the word instead of calling > > > addSpace, and then I saw that PrevWasSPC > > > isn't set if the space was at the end of the > > > word. > > > > > > If it's just something that no one ever got > > > around to dealing with, I'll make a patch. > > > > That hits into a deeper problem: the treatment of > > whitespace is not well defined inside the textblock yet. > > The same problem arises when handling NBSP. There's no > > clear definition on how to handle/flag it. > > If you're willing to study the textblock word wrapping, > > and the whitespace problem, great! I think the next big > > step for dillo is to handle DIV as a floating word (so it > > can be rendered side by side, as intended), and AFAIS that > > needs changes in the textblock. > > This is a task for 2.2. > > I have some Textblock code around to fix "white-space: nowrap" > (which shows up a lot on wikipedia, where the category stuff > at the bottoms of pages is displayed badly) > that I've been saving for discussion after this release. > I have absolutely no clue about floating, though, and have > been hoping that Johannes will develop an interest in it :) > Actually I've also been waiting for someone else to step up :)

May 10, 2009

Nav_repush() is hurting valgrind

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 08:20:09AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > Here are two more that show the same thing. With a vanilla dillo they > leak DilloImages. The imgref patch that I attached earlier fixes the > leaks. > > http://stephenlaw.blogspot.com/2009/05/careful-how-you-use-bogus.html > http://www.nybooks.com/articles/22694 > > I've attached the valgrind logs. The "__0.txt" versions are from the > vanilla repo. The others are after applying the imgref patch. No > other patches were applied. I see "bogus_log.txt" has a SIGSEGV. Does it mean you get a segfault exit with the patch applied on that page? (it doesn't happen here, and I've got no segfault in a long time). -- Cheers Jorge.-

May 10, 2009

Nav_repush() is hurting valgrind

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 08:20:09AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > On Sat, May 09, 2009 at 12:19:17PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > > I've found this: > > > > ==9830== 1,420 (352 direct, 1,068 indirect) bytes in 11 blocks are definitely > > lost in loss record 153 of 192 > > ==9830== at 0x4025D2E: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207) > > ==9830== by 0x8081270: dMalloc (dlib.c:36) > > ==9830== by 0x807E46A: a_Image_new (image.cc:40) > > ==9830== by 0x80703C5: a_Html_image_new(DilloHtml*, char const*, int, > > _DilloUrl*) (html.cc:2067) > > ==9830== by 0x8074F49: _ZL16Html_input_imageP9DilloHtmlPKci (form.cc:1905) > > ==9830== by 0x8078C5A: Html_tag_open_input(DilloHtml*, char const*, int) > > (form.cc:484) > > ==9830== by 0x8071F71: _ZL16Html_process_tagP9DilloHtmlPci (html.cc:3455) > > ==9830== by 0x80725E8: _ZL14Html_write_rawP9DilloHtmlPcii (html.cc:3756) > > ==9830== by 0x807276F: DilloHtml::write(char*, int, int) (html.cc:573) > > ==9830== by 0x8072802: _ZL13Html_callbackiP12_CacheClient (html.cc:3647) > > ==9830== by 0x8060BC7: Cache_process_queue (cache.c:1154) > > ==9830== by 0x80603A0: a_Cache_process_dbuf (cache.c:876) > > > > in www.lacuarta.cl > > Here are two more that show the same thing. With a vanilla dillo they > leak DilloImages. The imgref patch that I attached earlier fixes the > leaks. > > http://stephenlaw.blogspot.com/2009/05/careful-how-you-use-bogus.html > http://www.nybooks.com/articles/22694 > > I've attached the valgrind logs. The "__0.txt" versions are from the > vanilla repo. The others are after applying the imgref patch. No > other patches were applied. > > I think it's clear that image reference counting is currently broken > and the imgref patch, or something like it, is needed to fix it. Patch reviewed and committed! Now, with this patch, is there any other Image-related problem detected by valgrind? AFAIS, it was made by Johannes, corvid and you? Just to give due credit in the ChangeLog. -- Cheers Jorge.-

May 10, 2009