- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev]Preparing the 0.8.1 release

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > Jorge Arellano Cid wrote > > > Please test our current CVS hardly, and tell us how it did. > > Hi, I have been using dillo CVS since a day or so after you announced > the improved HTML bug detection and error recovery. It is certainly a > great improvement over 1.8.0 . No more occasional crashes (I notice > the "aborts on HTML table inside <sup>" bug I reported is fixed, which > is well cool). Slashdot renders OK now (though I suspect this is > partially due to them cleaning up their cruddy HTML a little). > > Have there been any more improvements in CVS? If so I'll update and > check them out! Sure there are. You can check the change entries here: http://cvs.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/dillo/dillo/ChangeLog BTW, I still don't know how to recover the last commit-log entries from CVS (by date if possible). Any CVS wizard here? > Kudos to the dillo project for a great tool! Thanks a lot. Cheers Jorge.-

April 23, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]About proxy authorization && password storing

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Ivan Daniluk wrote: > > [...] > > - renamed a_Http_use_proxy_passwd() to a_Http_set_proxy_passwd(). > > - Made the password not visible when typed. > > - Added a commented entry for "http_proxyuser" in dillorc. > > > > This patch is now in CVS, but is not tested because I don't > > have a proxy at hand! :-) > I've tested - it seems to be ok. Good. > And one correction from Francis Daly: > ------------------------------------------- > > From: "Francis Daly" <francis(a)daoine.org> > > To: "Ivan Daniluk" <Ivan.Daniluk(a)ucl.com.ua> > > > > On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 06:49:45PM +0300, Ivan Daniluk wrote: > > Hi there, > > One small thing: > > > + static const char *base64_hex = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ" > > > + "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz" > > > + "0123456789._"; > > > > RFC 2068 (HTTP/1.1) defers to RFC 2045 (MIME), which uses "+/" as the > > final two elements, instead of "._". > > > > RFC 1945 (HTTP/1.0) defers to RFC 1521 (MIME, obsoleted by 2045) which > > uses the same. Done! > PS. I've sent a letter to Madis, but have got no reply yet. Yes, he's under too much work now (we were working on the SSL plugin and he had to stop because of his duties). Please allow him some time. BTW, we have a new SSL dpi prototype (not for the next release though). More on this later. I'll send a recapitualtion about the FLTK port first... Cheers Jorge.-

April 23, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]Preparing the 0.8.1 release

by Daniel Fairhead

Sorry, forgot to mention platform, Latest CVS (11:30am - Fri 23 Apr 2004), x86 Gentoo Linux System, gcc version 3.3.3 20040217 compiled with CFLAGS='-pipe -O2 -mcpu=pentium2 -march=pentium2 -mmmx -fomit-frame-pointer' Dan -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

April 23, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]Preparing the 0.8.1 release

by Daniel Fairhead

Hi, > That is, the new parser (going to lots of sites and asserting > there're no crashes), and the recently found problems with puppy > linux and downloading and FTP (has anyone experienced trouble > with these dillo plugins on their systems?). New renderer seems good. Improvements on some sites. No crashes or anything like that. The FTP plugin seems to be working too, for directories. It doesn't seem to handle files though, it gives me "Illegal Seek" errors. A simple example is ftp.sf.net, and then clicking on index-sf.html or robots.txt. One question... if I go to an invalid ftp URL, it doesn't say in the statusbar "not a directory" or whatever, it only says so in the console, is this correct behaviour? Thanks all, Dan -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.

April 23, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]Preparing the 0.8.1 release

by Jeremy Henty

Jorge Arellano Cid wrote > Please test our current CVS hardly, and tell us how it did. Hi, I have been using dillo CVS since a day or so after you announced the improved HTML bug detection and error recovery. It is certainly a great improvement over 1.8.0 . No more occasional crashes (I notice the "aborts on HTML table inside <sup>" bug I reported is fixed, which is well cool). Slashdot renders OK now (though I suspect this is partially due to them cleaning up their cruddy HTML a little). Have there been any more improvements in CVS? If so I'll update and check them out! Kudos to the dillo project for a great tool! Regards, Jeremy Henty

April 23, 2004

[Dillo-dev][OT] Fonts in Ted wordprocessor

by Barry Kauler

This is off-topic, but it may interest someone on the Dillo-dev list. I am using the "Ted" wordprocessor in my tiny Puppy Linux distro, and I notice that Damn Small Linux has also gone over to Ted. We are both using the GTK version. Mark de Does, the author, wrote it for Motif, and someone helped him to get it to work on GTK 1.2, and we use the GTK version on Puppy and DSL. That person who originally helped him has moved on, and the GTK interface is left somewhat immature. I don't want to poach anyone off the Dillo development, as I want Dillo to go full steam ahead, but if anyone reading this has an interest in helping Mark as an additional temporary project, you can find his web page at www.nllgg.nl/Ted and his email is mdedoes(a)xs4all.nl Ted is philosophically like Dillo, small and powerful. Ted works on RTF as its native format and can export to html, ps and pdf. Ted is also WYSIWYG. Note that the html generated uses a lot of CSS, to get the layout right. Mostly what is wrong is that the GTK dialog boxes are enormous, and font selection is disfunctional (plus more things). I upgraded to the latest, v2.16, but I get a gdk error message when change fonts, had to go back to v2.14. Dillo handles fonts very smoothly (hats off to you guys on that one) and some of that would be very good in Ted. So, thought I would post this, in case it interests anyone. There might be some code that can come the other way. Regards, Barry Kauler

April 22, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev]Preparing the 0.8.1 release

by Jens Arm

> Please test our current CVS hardly, and tell us how it did. Directories like http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/linux/DVD+RW/tools/ or others are not rendered correctly Jens

April 22, 2004

[Dillo-dev]Preparing the 0.8.1 release

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Hi guys, 0.8.1 is getting closer every day. It will feature what's currently in the CVS (basically the improved HTML bug detection and rendering). I'd love to be able to switch this dillo version from alpha to beta stable, but for that there's a lot of testing required. That is, the new parser (going to lots of sites and asserting there're no crashes), and the recently found problems with puppy linux and downloading and FTP (has anyone experienced trouble with these dillo plugins on their systems?). Please test our current CVS hardly, and tell us how it did. Thanks to Jim, who was the first one to send some feesback: > Wow! I can see a big improvement, lots of sites that rendered readably, > but 'iffy', are now much clearer and cleaner. Cheers Jorge.-

April 22, 2004

Re: [Dillo-dev] ftp, ssl, download plugins not working

by Jorge Arellano Cid

Hi Barry, > Jorge, > Below is a repeat of part of my last posting in thread "Can't start dpid". > I would like to know, is there anything further that I can do > to help chase this bug down? A few days ago I answered this email with some new code in CVS for testing. Did it solve the problem? It'd be good to have it solved before the dillo-0.8.1 release, which is coming soon. Cheers Jorge.-

April 22, 2004

[Dillo-dev]Re: [Fink-devel] [Dillo] FONTS

by Michèle Garoche

Le 22 avr. 2004, à 3:51, Joe Corneli a écrit : > Thanks. I'm somewhat amazed that the Dillo people didn't catch > that. I did not catch it at once. Actually I did not even see at once the part where you put you .dillorc file, only that you could not change the fonts. Suddenly my fingers scrolled the mouse on their own, and it was there right before my eyes :-) Just to say it's pure chance. > >>> My ~/.dillo/.dillorc > > Note that the file should be named ~/.dillo/dillorc (leave the > second dot). > > I do think it would be nice to support a .dillorc too, for people > who, like me, automatically type the `.'. Why not *, $, etc... :-) You have another option: click on help in the splash screen after dillo launch. Then scroll down to Usage, and search for the second red word, then follow strictly the instructions. Michèle <http://micmacfr.homeunix.org>

April 22, 2004