- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Status of dillo_grows

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On Do, Apr 14, 2016, Nick Warne wrote: > On 14/04/16 19:24, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > >On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:29:14PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > >>Hi! > >> > >>I've just pushed some optimizatios to > >><http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows>, so that all performance issues > >>I know of seem fixed now. Since this version runs quite stable, I'd > >>like to merge this into the main repository at hg.dillo.org, so that > >>it hopefully soon becomes a new release. What do you think? > > I am sorry, this build is borken: > > http://forums.thinkbroadband.com > > There are lots of forums there - this build of Dillo only shows the first > screen with no option to scroll down. > > Also I have found a few other issues. I see the problem with forums.thinkbroadband.com, I'll look at it. However, the current version at hg.dillo.org shows the same problem, so this should not block the merge, only a release. Sebastian

April 14, 2016

Status of dillo_grows

by nick＠linicks.net

On 14/04/16 19:24, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:29:14PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: >> Hi! >> >> I've just pushed some optimizatios to >> <http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows>, so that all performance issues >> I know of seem fixed now. Since this version runs quite stable, I'd >> like to merge this into the main repository at hg.dillo.org, so that >> it hopefully soon becomes a new release. What do you think? I am sorry, this build is borken: http://forums.thinkbroadband.com There are lots of forums there - this build of Dillo only shows the first screen with no option to scroll down. Also I have found a few other issues. Nick > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev at dillo.org > http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev > -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"

April 14, 2016

Status of dillo_grows

by nick＠linicks.net

On 14/04/16 19:35, Nick Warne wrote: > > > On 14/04/16 19:22, Johannes Hofmann wrote: >>> What is the URL to the repository (default?) to clone the latest Dillo >>> build? >> >> you can get the dillo_grows branch with >> >> hg clone http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows > > OK, thanks... but there is no ./configure file. Ignore this - me being an idiot. All is fine. Nick -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"

April 14, 2016

Status of dillo_grows

by nick＠linicks.net

On 14/04/16 19:24, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > I'm running it for some minutes now and it feels super fast! Heh. Dillo on my lowly notebook is to fast - quicker than an eyeblick - how can it get faster? Nick -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"

April 14, 2016

Status of dillo_grows

by nick＠linicks.net

On 14/04/16 19:22, Johannes Hofmann wrote: >> What is the URL to the repository (default?) to clone the latest Dillo >> build? > > you can get the dillo_grows branch with > > hg clone http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows OK, thanks... but there is no ./configure file. Nick -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"

April 14, 2016

Status of dillo_grows

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:29:14PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > Hi! > > I've just pushed some optimizatios to > <http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows>, so that all performance issues > I know of seem fixed now. Since this version runs quite stable, I'd > like to merge this into the main repository at hg.dillo.org, so that > it hopefully soon becomes a new release. What do you think? I'm running it for some minutes now and it feels super fast! I'll report back after some more testing. Johannes

April 14, 2016

Status of dillo_grows

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 07:02:47PM +0100, Nick Warne wrote: > Hi all, > > On 13/04/16 21:29, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I've just pushed some optimizatios to > > <http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows>, so that all performance issues > > I know of seem fixed now. Since this version runs quite stable, I'd > > like to merge this into the main repository at hg.dillo.org, so that > > it hopefully soon becomes a new release. What do you think? > > I have messed about a bit with hg, but getting nowhere. > > What is the URL to the repository (default?) to clone the latest Dillo > build? you can get the dillo_grows branch with hg clone http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows Cheers, Johannes

April 14, 2016

Status of dillo_grows

by nick＠linicks.net

Hi all, On 13/04/16 21:29, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > Hi! > > I've just pushed some optimizatios to > <http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows>, so that all performance issues > I know of seem fixed now. Since this version runs quite stable, I'd > like to merge this into the main repository at hg.dillo.org, so that > it hopefully soon becomes a new release. What do you think? I have messed about a bit with hg, but getting nowhere. What is the URL to the repository (default?) to clone the latest Dillo build? Thanks, Nick -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"

April 14, 2016

Status of dillo_grows

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

Hi! I've just pushed some optimizatios to <http://flpsed.org/hgweb/dillo_grows>, so that all performance issues I know of seem fixed now. Since this version runs quite stable, I'd like to merge this into the main repository at hg.dillo.org, so that it hopefully soon becomes a new release. What do you think? Sebastian

April 13, 2016

px in HTML

by nick＠linicks.net

On 10/04/16 23:23, James C wrote: > Hi All, > > I wonder what the steps are, to have a conversation about whether this > is a good move: > http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2014-August/010200.html > > Regards, > James. I just quickly looked at that. It is not right. You can't guess. Dillo does the right thing in that what it doesn't understand it drops and uses a safe 'auto' value. 'px' '%' et al are all rendered differently, so you can't ignore one that the code doesn't know what to do with - i.e.: "ignoring garbage; using %g (possibly in pixels)\n", Possibly? That could be dangerous, if not bad coding. Nick > On 11/04/2016, Nick Warne <nick at linicks.net> wrote: >> On 10/04/16 16:21, Sebastian Geerken wrote: >>> On So, Apr 10, 2016, Nick Warne wrote: >>>> I have noticed that Dillo doesn't render px properly - this snippet: >>>> >>>> <hr width=500px align=left> >>>> >>>> just produces: >>>> >>>> . >>>> >>>> Using 50% (e.g.) works OK. Is this bad HTML or a 'to-do' thing? >>> >>> The HTML width attribute (which is depricated, btw) does not support >>> "px", instead, <hr width=500 ...> would be correct. >> >> Yes, thanks, I just sussed that out. Dillo is great for debugging HTML, >> as most browsers somehow parse crappy input into what seems right (but >> is wrong!). >> >> width=475 works great now. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Nick >> >> -- >> Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with >> time travel, you never can tell." >> -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara" >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dillo-dev mailing list >> Dillo-dev at dillo.org >> http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev >> > -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"

April 11, 2016