- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Hello!

by nick＠linicks.net

On 17/04/16 14:15, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > @Per: please send only plain text to dillo-dev. It's simpler and, BTW, > most of HTML email gets filtered out somewhere. Per is a MS Windows guy :/ Nick -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"

April 17, 2016

Hello!

by jcid＠dillo.org

Hi Per, Is good to see you're still there! On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 11:44:23AM +0100, Nick Warne wrote: > Hi Per, > > On 17/04/16 11:23, Per Andersson wrote: > >(my previous messages did not reach the list, it seems: trying again) > > One of your messages reached the list - I replied: > > http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2016-April/010756.html > > It doesn't appear in the archive, though. @Per: please send only plain text to dillo-dev. It's simpler and, BTW, most of HTML email gets filtered out somewhere. -- Cheers Jorge.-

April 17, 2016

Status of dillo_grows

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On So, Apr 17, 2016, Nick Warne wrote: > On 17/04/16 11:40, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > >On Do, Apr 14, 2016, Nick Warne wrote: > >>I am sorry, this build is borken: > >> > >>http://forums.thinkbroadband.com > > > >This is a problem with CSS `height`. Consider this HTML: > > > > <table style="height: 20px; border: 1px solid"> > > <tr> > > <td>Sunt autem quidam e nostris, qui haec subtilius velint > > [...] > > putant.</td> > > </tr> > > </table> > > > >Dillo shows the table only 20px high, while Firefox seems to treat > >`height` the same way as `min-height`. I'm not sure which is correct, > >but probably we ought to do something about this, even if dillo is > >correct. > > Using Dillo 3.0.5, that table looks the same in Dillo, Firefox and > links/lynx (but no border in links or lynx, of course). > > ? The problem with versions 3.1-dev (at hg.dillo.org) and 3.1-dev_grows2. Dillo 3.0.5 has no problem, since CSS `heigh` was introduced in the 3.1-dev version (not yet released). Sebastian

April 17, 2016

Status of dillo_grows

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On So, Apr 17, 2016, Nick Warne wrote: > On 17/04/16 11:40, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > >On Do, Apr 14, 2016, Nick Warne wrote: > >>I am sorry, this build is borken: > >> > >>http://forums.thinkbroadband.com > > > >This is a problem with CSS `height`. Consider this HTML: > > > > <table style="height: 20px; border: 1px solid"> > > <tr> > > <td>Sunt autem quidam e nostris, qui haec subtilius velint > > [...] > > putant.</td> > > </tr> > > </table> > > > >Dillo shows the table only 20px high, while Firefox seems to treat > >`height` the same way as `min-height`. I'm not sure which is correct, > >but probably we ought to do something about this, even if dillo is > >correct. > > Using Dillo 3.0.5, that table looks the same in Dillo, Firefox and > links/lynx (but no border in links or lynx, of course). > > ? Simple answer: dillo 3.0.5 does not yet support CSS `height`. Sebastian

April 17, 2016

Status of dillo_grows

by nick＠linicks.net

On 17/04/16 11:40, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > On Do, Apr 14, 2016, Nick Warne wrote: >> I am sorry, this build is borken: >> >> http://forums.thinkbroadband.com > > This is a problem with CSS `height`. Consider this HTML: > > <table style="height: 20px; border: 1px solid"> > <tr> > <td>Sunt autem quidam e nostris, qui haec subtilius velint > tradere et negent satis esse, quid bonum sit aut quid > malum, sensu iudicari, sed animo etiam ac ratione > intellegi posse et voluptatem ipsam per se esse > expetendam et dolorem ipsum per se esse > fugiendum. itaque aiunt hanc quasi naturalem atque > insitam in animis nostris inesse notionem, ut alterum > esse appetendum, alterum aspernandum sentiamus. Alii > autem, quibus ego assentior, cum a philosophis > compluribus permulta dicantur, cur nec voluptas in bonis > sit numeranda nec in malis dolor, non existimant > oportere nimium nos causae confidere, sed et > argumentandum et accurate disserendum et rationibus > conquisitis de voluptate et dolore disputandum > putant.</td> > </tr> > </table> > > Dillo shows the table only 20px high, while Firefox seems to treat > `height` the same way as `min-height`. I'm not sure which is correct, > but probably we ought to do something about this, even if dillo is > correct. Using Dillo 3.0.5, that table looks the same in Dillo, Firefox and links/lynx (but no border in links or lynx, of course). ? Nick -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"

April 17, 2016

Hello!

by nick＠linicks.net

Hi Per, On 17/04/16 11:23, Per Andersson wrote: > (my previous messages did not reach the list, it seems: trying again) One of your messages reached the list - I replied: http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/2016-April/010756.html It doesn't appear in the archive, though. Nick > I am the new guy: programming since 1976 (before that it was only hardware). > I have tried most fields in software, except databases. > I live in Arl?v in southern Sweden. I'm also a musician and archive > researcher/genealogist. > Before i can do anything useful, I need some general understanding of the > project and the software. > Best regards > > Per Andersson > > Senior developer > Artifex Software > > artifex at europe.com > PS My company has no connection with the makers of Ghostscript! ( I had the name > first :-) > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev at dillo.org > http://lists.dillo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev > -- Gosh that takes me back... or is it forward? That's the trouble with time travel, you never can tell." -- Doctor Who "Androids of Tara"

April 17, 2016

Status of dillo_grows

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On Do, Apr 14, 2016, Nick Warne wrote: > I am sorry, this build is borken: > > http://forums.thinkbroadband.com This is a problem with CSS `height`. Consider this HTML: <table style="height: 20px; border: 1px solid"> <tr> <td>Sunt autem quidam e nostris, qui haec subtilius velint tradere et negent satis esse, quid bonum sit aut quid malum, sensu iudicari, sed animo etiam ac ratione intellegi posse et voluptatem ipsam per se esse expetendam et dolorem ipsum per se esse fugiendum. itaque aiunt hanc quasi naturalem atque insitam in animis nostris inesse notionem, ut alterum esse appetendum, alterum aspernandum sentiamus. Alii autem, quibus ego assentior, cum a philosophis compluribus permulta dicantur, cur nec voluptas in bonis sit numeranda nec in malis dolor, non existimant oportere nimium nos causae confidere, sed et argumentandum et accurate disserendum et rationibus conquisitis de voluptate et dolore disputandum putant.</td> </tr> </table> Dillo shows the table only 20px high, while Firefox seems to treat `height` the same way as `min-height`. I'm not sure which is correct, but probably we ought to do something about this, even if dillo is correct. Sebastian

April 17, 2016

Hello!

by artifex.since.1979＠gmail.com

An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.dillo.org/pipermail/dillo-dev/attachments/20160417/257516db/at…>

April 17, 2016

Status of dillo_grows

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On Fr, Apr 15, 2016, Nick Warne wrote: > One more issue to look at - on one of my pages, the in line style renders > correctly with: > > <div style="height: 2px; width: 850px; background-color: blue; text-align: > center;"> > <span style="background-color: white; position: relative; top: -0.75em"> > <font size=-1><b> Word search section ['agc' > engine] </b></font> > </span> > </div> > > Now, current release Dillo just makes it a background colour bar ~ > acceptable. Your patch makes it a sort of underscore coloured line that > passes through the text. I looked at this in detail, and found some strange behaviour in all three versions of dillo (3.0.4, 3.1-dev, and 3.1-dev_grows2). Consider this HTML: <div> A <span style="background-color: green">B</span> C </div> <div> A <span style="background-color: green"><font>B</font></span> C </div> In the first line, "B" is shown with a green background, as expected, but not in the second line, where the only difference is the <font> element. Is this a bug of the HTML parser? Sebastian

April 17, 2016

Status of dillo_grows

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On Sa, Apr 16, 2016, Nick Warne wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > On 16/04/16 14:38, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > >On Fr, Apr 15, 2016, Nick Warne wrote: > >>One more issue to look at - on one of my pages, the in line style renders > >>correctly with: > >> > >><div style="height: 2px; width: 850px; background-color: blue; text-align: > >>center;"> > >> <span style="background-color: white; position: relative; top: -0.75em"> > >> <font size=-1><b> Word search section ['agc' > >>engine] </b></font> > >> </span> > >></div> > >> > >>Now, current release Dillo just makes it a background colour bar ~ > >>acceptable. Your patch makes it a sort of underscore coloured line that > >>passes through the text. > >> > >>To test: > >> > >>https://linicks.net/AnAdIc/ > > > >Again, this is again an issue also with the version at hg.dillo.org, > >although the result is slightly different. > > > > From what I see at a first glance the problem is that backgrounds for > >inline sections is not yet supported. > > > >If noone reports severe problems with dillo_grows, which do *not* > >affect the version at hg.dillo.org, I'll do the merge soon. > > Thanks for the hard work. I don't understand what you mean by that last > sentence. If dillo_grows does have a few issues, then surely merging it > with hg.dillo.org will taint that too? Or have I read it wrong? Not if a bug is already in hg.dillo.org. Sebastian

April 16, 2016