- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: [Dillo-dev]Dillo resolving problems

by Patrick Shanahan

* Liam J. Foy <liamfoy(a)sepulcrum.org> [03-30-05 18:48]: > On to more important topics, I have a strange problem which I > dont understand. I believe it could possibly be dillo related. I am > currently using Dillo 0.8.4 for your information. The problem is > strange. A few websites I browse on a regular basis cannot be viewed. I > get the error: ERROR: No route to host. However, I can ping and view > these websites using another browser. An example of a website I cannot > view is: www.netbsd.org/ > > The system dillo is on currenly runs DragonFly BSD following > the Stable tag. Whats really strange is I can ping and view these > websites using other means =/ You have problems with your system. I have forwarded to you directly a screen capture of the site accessed with dillo .... -- Patrick Shanahan Registered Linux User #207535 http://wahoo.no-ip.org @ http://counter.li.org HOG # US1244711 Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery

March 30, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?

by Jeremy Henty

On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:51:05PM +0200, meka wrote: > ... 1.2.x version [of FLTK] which is not supported any more by the > fltk team (if I understood well). Pardon me, but I *think* you misunderstand. The FLTK web site <URL:http://www.fltk.org/> lists version 1.1.6 as the *stable* version. Both 1.2.x and 2.0.x appear to be works in progress. Cheers, Jeremy Henty

March 30, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?

by meka

On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:17:54 -0800 Kelson Vibber <kelson(a)pobox.com> wrote: > The current plan (unless it's been changed off-list) is to move to FLTK > instead, which should pick up things like Unicode support and a more > current code base. > > -- > Kelson Vibber > www.hyperborea.org > > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)dillo.org > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev BTW, how is this plan going? I mean, I like fltk, but on the site says (or said, I haven't seen it recently) that it will use 1.2.x version which is not supported any more by the fltk team (if I understood well). Which version is is is going to be used? I vote for 2.0 (Unicode by default is there). -- I haven't even got up and the bug is here :o)

March 30, 2005

[Fwd: Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?]

by R. Tyler Ballance

oops, forgot to reply to the list :-! -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: R. Tyler Ballance <tyler(a)tamu.edu> To: Kelson Vibber <kelson(a)pobox.com> Subject: Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..? Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2005 12:16:56 -0600 On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 09:17 -0800, Kelson Vibber wrote: > R. Tyler Ballance wrote: > > Is there any reason Dillo is still building against the GTK+ 1.2 > > libraries as opposed to 2.0 ? > > People have done tests, and Dillo becomes much slower and much larger > under GTK2. > > The current plan (unless it's been changed off-list) is to move to FLTK > instead, which should pick up things like Unicode support and a more > current code base. > That's fine, but where (if any) is the code in CVS, i've worked with FLTK before, but only from a C++ perspective...is Dillo staying in C? By the way, jcid@, I heard you were at FOSDEM, and were staying with Mind.be, which one were you again, I was staying there with the MirOS/MirBSD hackers, I stayed up all night working on ports, so I probably saw you downstairs sometime hacking away (or listening to those comical Plan9 fellows talk ;)) Have you given thought to wxWidgets, or anything other graphics libs? (FLTK was kinda ugly the last time I used it, then again, GTK+ 1.2 isn't much pretty either) -R. Tyler Ballance

March 30, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?

by Kelson Vibber

R. Tyler Ballance wrote: > Is there any reason Dillo is still building against the GTK+ 1.2 > libraries as opposed to 2.0 ? People have done tests, and Dillo becomes much slower and much larger under GTK2. The current plan (unless it's been changed off-list) is to move to FLTK instead, which should pick up things like Unicode support and a more current code base. -- Kelson Vibber www.hyperborea.org

March 30, 2005

[Dillo-dev]GTK 1.2 ..?

by R. Tyler Ballance

Is there any reason Dillo is still building against the GTK+ 1.2 libraries as opposed to 2.0 ? I'm not sure what it would break to build against the 2.0 libs, but I would really like to start building against them so I can add the clipboard code that i've had my eye on ;) I don't think the size would grow _that_ much, and I think the benefits would be large from using 2.0. Right now, the only difference I can see would be in the autoconf files, GTK+ 2.0 uses pkg-config to supply the correct cflags and ldflags, while GTK+ 1.2 uses gtk-config. Ideas, suggestions? -R. Tyler Ballance p.s. I'm working through bug #668 which I added last night on my NetBSD laptop right now, woo

March 30, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Refresh patch for 0.8.4

by Brian Hechinger

On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 09:19:34AM +0100, Roberto A. Foglietta wrote: > > For this reason I decide to have -r option instead put an option in a > config file because packager could deliver its own default config with > that option activated by default. It could be much more difficult for > the packager to force me using that option by command line, instead. > ;-) this is why my plan was to have an rc file similar to the cookierc file so you can have fine grained control over which sites are allowed to meta-refresh and which ones aren't. IMNSHO, the best solution. ;) -brian -- "Now you know why I got the everliving hell OUT of Windows administration. Knowing it doesn't make it any easier. It's just broken-as-designed."

March 16, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]Patch: config option for page increment

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 02:41:31PM +0100, Alexander Becher wrote: > Hi everyone, Hi! > I have made a small change to dillo-0.8.4, so I can put a line like > > scroll_factor=0.5 > > in my dillorc and get the old behaviour for scrolling a page. > > It would be great if this could be included in the dillo distribution, > so I don't have to patch my source every time I build a new version. > > I know that the current effort is the port to FLTK. If this makes this > patch useless for new versions, I'll try to adapt it once the port to > FLTK is done. Don't worry, most probably there will not be a 0.8.5. Just be sure that once the protoype is available (with scrolling ;) you submit a patch for it. -- Cheers Jorge.-

March 14, 2005

[Dillo-dev]Patch: config option for page increment

by Alexander Becher

Hi everyone, I have made a small change to dillo-0.8.4, so I can put a line like scroll_factor=0.5 in my dillorc and get the old behaviour for scrolling a page. It would be great if this could be included in the dillo distribution, so I don't have to patch my source every time I build a new version. I know that the current effort is the port to FLTK. If this makes this patch useless for new versions, I'll try to adapt it once the port to FLTK is done. Regards Alexander -- PGP key available

March 14, 2005

Re: [Dillo-dev]configure cache size

by Jorge Arellano Cid

On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 09:09:39AM +0100, G. Milde wrote: > > Dear developers, > > thanks for dillo. :-) > [...] > > PS: This is a re-post. I sent this mail once, before subscribing and it > seems like it did not get through the moderation process. dillo-dev receives too much SPAM, so the moderation process became: if (!subscribed) reject; -- Cheers Jorge.-

March 14, 2005