- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

website FAQ update

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:34:57PM +0200, Justus Winter wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:21:25PM +0000, corvid wrote: > >> Are "dillo1" and "dillo2" official names? If so, I'll add in some text to > >> make it clear what's what. > > > > They're not official, but good mnemonics! > > > > When there was GTK1 dillo only, there was no confusion. > > Currently the CVS is using dillo-fltk, but I'd much prefer > > to have a binary named "dillo2". > > > > Probably this is a good choice. Let's hear what dillo-dev > > people say. Here's the proposal: > > > > * call the new binary "dillo2", and refer to the old 0.8.x series > > as dillo1. > > I think it's problematic to have a digit in the official name (or in the > name of the binary) since people will think it's the version. I'd > suggest something along these lines: > > * Dillo is the name of the brand > * dillo2 is the codename for the fltk branch > * for marketing reasons sell any snapshots / upcoming releases of that > branch as the all new dillo version 2.x.y with tons of new features > * the binary is called dillo (it's what people expect to type in to > start the lightweight web browser thingie [at least I tried to run > $PREFIX/bin/dillo a couple of times now...]) Well, that's the canonical way of doing it (no pun intended). OK, let's do it that way then, and let's talk about "dillo2" in the FAQ. -- Cheers Jorge.-

May 19, 2008

patch: dw configure args: rtfl and doublebuffer

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 08:34:38PM +0000, corvid wrote: > I saw in the bug tracker that --disable-rtfl still turns on rtfl msgs. > > Did some reading. > The third argument to AC_ARG_ENABLE is always run if the option was > specified, regardless of the value. If the option is not specified, > the fourth argument is run. > > --disable-FEATURE just becomes --enable-FEATURE=no. > > (I'll send a separate patch to Jorge to allow compilation with rtfl.) Committed. -- Cheers Jorge.-

May 19, 2008

[patch] dillo and huge pages

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

Hi, to test how dillo behaves on huge pages, I downloaded the mysql manual as a single html page: http://downloads.mysql.com/docs/refman-5.1-en.html.tar.gz With this page I noticed that the drawRegion in FltkViewBase can grow pretty large which slows down loading the page. Attached patch limits the size of the drawRegion to 16 rectangles. With this patch (and HUGE_FILESIZE in cache.c increased to 16M) dillo works pretty well on this huge page. Better than dillo1 and firefox! One problem is that clicking on anchor links (to anchors within the page) reloads the page which take some time. Also memory usage gets pretty high (250M with images disabled). I'm experimenting with reducing the size of struct Word in textblock.hh by moving the highlight stuff out of struct Word and into Textblock. This brings memory usage down to 199M. However, I don't know the highlighting stuff enough to be sure I don't break anything. This probabely falls into the "premature optimization" category anyway. Cheers, Johannes

May 19, 2008

patch: dw configure args: rtfl and doublebuffer

by corvid＠lavabit.com

I saw in the bug tracker that --disable-rtfl still turns on rtfl msgs. Did some reading. The third argument to AC_ARG_ENABLE is always run if the option was specified, regardless of the value. If the option is not specified, the fourth argument is run. --disable-FEATURE just becomes --enable-FEATURE=no. (I'll send a separate patch to Jorge to allow compilation with rtfl.)

May 19, 2008

Uncluttering dillos UI - getting rid of the dialog boxes

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 07:15:11PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 05:46:26PM +0200, Justus Winter wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > I thought about dillos fullscreen mode, which is not a fullscreen mode > > at all but a "get rid of those panels"-mode. So I decided to rename > > those functions and variables accordingly (00-*) to make it possible to > > implement a real fullscreen mode (01-*). > > shouldn't window resizing be done by the window manager? Yes, AFAIS. > Do we really need to implement this inside dillo? I'd let the WM do it. (e.g. ALT+F11 in Xfce). > I agree on the name change however. Maybe "fullwindow" is a good name. -- Cheers Jorge.-

May 18, 2008

Bug that aborts Dillo

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 02:17:55AM +0000, corvid wrote: > Jorge wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > I reviewed my personal notes on dillo segfaults and all of them > > but one are fixed now. This is: > > > > BUG: > > http://episteme.arstechnica.com/groupee/forums/a/tpc/f/96509133 > > /m/151006647731/r/264004847731 > > Aborts dillo. > > I tried it and it crashed. > Then I dug up the > > - requisition->width += getStyle()->boxDiffHeight (); > + requisition->width += getStyle()->boxDiffWidth (); > > in sizeRequestImpl from > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/pipermail/dillo-dev/2008-January/003690.html > and it no longer wanted to crash for me. Committed, also with the rest of the patch. BTW, when I skip one of these patches, please send me a reminder. I commented the patch to let Sebastian delete/fix the commented-out lines when working there. -- Cheers Jorge.-

May 18, 2008

Uncluttering dillos UI - getting rid of the dialog boxes

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 05:46:26PM +0200, Justus Winter wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I thought about dillos fullscreen mode, which is not a fullscreen mode > at all but a "get rid of those panels"-mode. So I decided to rename > those functions and variables accordingly (00-*) to make it possible to > implement a real fullscreen mode (01-*). shouldn't window resizing be done by the window manager? Do we really need to implement this inside dillo? I agree on the name change however. Cheers, Johannes

May 18, 2008

Horizontal scrolling

by 4winter＠informatik.uni-hamburg.de

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Huhu there :) attached is a tiny patch that enables the horizontal scrolling of the content of the main dillo widget. Unfortunately fltk supports this up to now (r6129) only on OSX. I do have a patch for fltk that enables this on x11, let's see if I can slip it in ;) Justus - -- gpg key fingerprint: C82D 382A AB38 1A54 5290 19D6 A0F9 B035 686C 6996 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIL0tNoPmwNWhsaZYRAmE+AJ9LN79iT4/nyt1JWJYt7BP1PYcFlQCeLV/g BRZ6xTrW7ER5rbDm7V5E1Hk= =SWKS -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

May 18, 2008

Keyboard shortcuts & fullscreen button

by 4winter＠informatik.uni-hamburg.de

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The UI constructor creates a button for the fullscreen mode, but it is not added to anything: // Make the full screen button (to be attached to the viewport later) // TODO: attach to the viewport FullScreen = new HighlightButton(0,0,15,15); [...] Any idea why this was postponed? Should it be enabled now? Also I noticed, that the way events are handled is somewhat lax with respect to modifier keys. The code just checks if ctrl is pressed, not if ctrl but none of the other modifiers are pressed. This makes ctrl-l equivalent with ctrl-shift-alt-l. I'd like to hear your opinions, is this a bug or a feature? Justus - -- gpg key fingerprint: C82D 382A AB38 1A54 5290 19D6 A0F9 B035 686C 6996 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFILwMvoPmwNWhsaZYRAmHYAJ49XUO6F6mBTG+CbWAzfN5yknkrKgCfQOjB QzlODEtqUdlztUo6tHuluUE= =hCHy -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

May 17, 2008

Uncluttering dillos UI - getting rid of the dialog boxes

by 4winter＠informatik.uni-hamburg.de

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I thought about dillos fullscreen mode, which is not a fullscreen mode at all but a "get rid of those panels"-mode. So I decided to rename those functions and variables accordingly (00-*) to make it possible to implement a real fullscreen mode (01-*). Cheers, Justus - -- gpg key fingerprint: C82D 382A AB38 1A54 5290 19D6 A0F9 B035 686C 6996 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFILv3RoPmwNWhsaZYRAtAeAKCpvjp7U4n+NW7U25gfd1DJDpnGkACeJw2c PhKxtMxtFGQ1zPs+Qi/Wv8o= =jxiR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

May 17, 2008