- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Re: the *_freeall() patch

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 01:21:12AM +0000, corvid wrote: > In http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/pipermail/dillo-dev/2009-March/006234.html > about key bindings, the matter of the *freeall()s came up. > My copy of the patch that I sent you has that same date on it, Mar 25, > and I think I sent it within maybe...two days. > > I've been running on it without incident since that time, other > than that since-fixed klist bug that it found. Committed. BTW, I also added a a_Prefs_freeall() function. Please test. -- Cheers Jorge.-

May 31, 2009

view source dpi question

by corvid＠lavabit.com

> annoyed by the slow source view widget I'd like to play with > a source viewer dpi (Jorge, I think you suggested to use a > dpi instead of coding it in dillo directly). > However I want to avoid to reload the page from the dpi, as I want > to be able to view the source exactly as it is currently displayed. > > How should I pass the html document from dillo to the dpi? Any > ideas? Can you borrow the start_send_page stuff used to send local files to dillo?

May 31, 2009

view source dpi question

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

Hi, annoyed by the slow source view widget I'd like to play with a source viewer dpi (Jorge, I think you suggested to use a dpi instead of coding it in dillo directly). However I want to avoid to reload the page from the dpi, as I want to be able to view the source exactly as it is currently displayed. How should I pass the html document from dillo to the dpi? Any ideas? Cheers, Johannes

May 31, 2009

[patch]: more doxygen fixes

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Johannes wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 02:58:40PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 06:50:28AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > > > > > Doxygen is missing some methods because it's not smart enough about > > > namespaces and sometimes thinks that the signatures of the declaration > > > and the definition are different when they are not. You can see the > > > warnings in its output (hint: redirect stdout to /dev/null to extract > > > the warnings from the noise). Patch attached that adds some explicit > > > namespace qualifiers. This removes doxygen's confusion, fixes the > > > docs and silences the warnings. > > > > It looks OK to me. > > Does anybody have any objection/comment? > > +1 No objections.

May 31, 2009

patch: Re: [Dillo-dev] https through a proxy

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 12:17:26AM +0000, corvid wrote: > Here you go. As I said, I have not had the opportunity to > test this under a wide range of conditions. I'd like to see this in the release, because ignoring the proxy for https is not only unexpected, but can be a security / privacy problem e.g. when using tor. Cheers, Johannes

May 31, 2009

[patch]: more doxygen fixes

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 02:58:40PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 06:50:28AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > > > Doxygen is missing some methods because it's not smart enough about > > namespaces and sometimes thinks that the signatures of the declaration > > and the definition are different when they are not. You can see the > > warnings in its output (hint: redirect stdout to /dev/null to extract > > the warnings from the noise). Patch attached that adds some explicit > > namespace qualifiers. This removes doxygen's confusion, fixes the > > docs and silences the warnings. > > It looks OK to me. > Does anybody have any objection/comment? +1 Cheers, Johannes

May 31, 2009

[patch]: spelling: instanciate

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 01:54:32PM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > Replying to myself, > > > You have been reading "Great stupidities of English spelling", > > number 361 of a *very* long series. > > Hasty clarification: I meant that English spelling itself is stupid > (since "instanciate" is more logical than "instantiate"). I wasn't > insulting the authors of the code (and didn't intend to write anything > that could be construed as though I was). :-) Although the meaning looked quite unambiguous to me from the beginning... -- Cheers Jorge.-

May 31, 2009

[patch]: more doxygen fixes

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 06:50:28AM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > Doxygen is missing some methods because it's not smart enough about > namespaces and sometimes thinks that the signatures of the declaration > and the definition are different when they are not. You can see the > warnings in its output (hint: redirect stdout to /dev/null to extract > the warnings from the noise). Patch attached that adds some explicit > namespace qualifiers. This removes doxygen's confusion, fixes the > docs and silences the warnings. It looks OK to me. Does anybody have any objection/comment? -- Cheers Jorge.-

May 31, 2009

[patch]: more doxygen fixes

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

Doxygen is missing some methods because it's not smart enough about namespaces and sometimes thinks that the signatures of the declaration and the definition are different when they are not. You can see the warnings in its output (hint: redirect stdout to /dev/null to extract the warnings from the noise). Patch attached that adds some explicit namespace qualifiers. This removes doxygen's confusion, fixes the docs and silences the warnings. Regards, Jeremy Henty

May 31, 2009

[patch]: spelling: instanciate

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jeremy wrote: > The act of creating an instance is not "instanciation" but > "instantiation". Patch attached. Committed.

May 30, 2009