Dillo-dev

Download

By thread

dillo-dev@mailman3.com

2 participants
11684 messages

1.3 port status

by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com

>Other then these, dillo built against fltk-1.3 looks fully functional to me so >far. ...might be one or two more quirks. One more GUI bug found, the "X" at the far upper right corner for closing tabs/windows appears to be completely missing. (imo, it's usually much easier to click ctrl-q anyways. ;-) -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Jan. 26, 2011

1.3 port status

by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com

> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 11:03:35PM +0000, corvid wrote: >Roger wrote: >> I was just using hg update (after the initial hg clone $url). > >hg update is something different. You use hg pull to get changes >from a repository. > >> Here's my description now, pages load, even news.google.com loads! Scrolling >> on news.google.com pauses/lags at times. No images loaded on news.google.com. > >Right now, the scrolling doesn't happen while the cursor wanders >outside of the scrollbar bounds. > >> As for the dillo interface, tabs appear after a few seconds/minutes of mouse >> wandering. I do have buttons, but the "File, View, ..." buttons are still >> hidden. > >After mouse wandering? Of their own accord? >View? I think I see one cause of a bug of the GUI. When opening a bookmark from dpi:/bm/ by right clicking and seleting "open link in new tab", the refresh to redraw the GUI frontend is not occurring. As such, the new tab is created invisibily and the GUI isn't refreshed showing the new tab has been opened until the user tries clicking one of the tabs. Now, once the bookmark url has been visited (I'm guessing cached), closing the tab and then reopening the tab via the same bookmark method as described above, the new tab will be visibily created and the GUI bug can no longer being seen. I'm guessing, a full window or GUI refresh or redraw is being dropped somewhere? Concerning the "File" button above the tab bar, I have none showing ... oh wait, thar it is! It's a big "F" button on the button bar next to the "Tools" button! Other then these, dillo built against fltk-1.3 looks fully functional to me so far. ...might be one or two more quirks. -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Jan. 26, 2011

patch: configure rm libpng version tests

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Joerg wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 03:49:05AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Is there a good reason not to use whatever libpng-config is linked to? > > I like the idea of not having to touch configure.in every time there's > > a new minor version, especially given how long we go between releases. > > As long as the libpng-config can be overriden by environment / configure > argument and the name of the variable is documented, that's fine. There is a $PNG_CONFIG in there. Hmm, a quick attempt to look through the autoconf manual doesn't say anything about how to tell --help to list env variables. What is generally done?

Jan. 26, 2011

patch: configure rm libpng version tests

by joerg.sonnenberger＠web.de

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 03:49:05AM +0000, corvid wrote: > Joerg wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:42:19AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > It seems that libpng is up to 1.5.0 now, so it's time to rip > > > out some version tests. > > > > libpng 1.5.0 also creates a lot of fallout, so expect users to stay with > > 1.4 for a while... > > In that people don't like the changes hiding data structures, or > that it will take time before developers get their software sorted > out to handle it? A lot of software was broken by it and it will take time to sort that out. > Is there a good reason not to use whatever libpng-config is linked to? > I like the idea of not having to touch configure.in every time there's > a new minor version, especially given how long we go between releases. As long as the libpng-config can be overriden by environment / configure argument and the name of the variable is documented, that's fine. Joerg

Jan. 26, 2011

patch: configure rm libpng version tests

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Joerg wrote: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:42:19AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > It seems that libpng is up to 1.5.0 now, so it's time to rip > > out some version tests. > > libpng 1.5.0 also creates a lot of fallout, so expect users to stay with > 1.4 for a while... In that people don't like the changes hiding data structures, or that it will take time before developers get their software sorted out to handle it? Is there a good reason not to use whatever libpng-config is linked to? I like the idea of not having to touch configure.in every time there's a new minor version, especially given how long we go between releases.

Jan. 26, 2011

patch: configure rm libpng version tests

by joerg.sonnenberger＠web.de

On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:42:19AM +0000, corvid wrote: > It seems that libpng is up to 1.5.0 now, so it's time to rip > out some version tests. libpng 1.5.0 also creates a lot of fallout, so expect users to stay with 1.4 for a while... Joerg

Jan. 26, 2011

patch: configure rm libpng version tests

by corvid＠lavabit.com

It seems that libpng is up to 1.5.0 now, so it's time to rip out some version tests.

Jan. 26, 2011

Final release of FLTK 2.0 Dillo

by corvid＠lavabit.com

What do we need to fix before we could have a release?

Jan. 25, 2011

Final release of FLTK 2.0 Dillo

by obeythepenguin＠gmail.com

*thinks switching toolkits every couple years was never a good idea to begin with* On 1/25/11, corvid <corvid(a)lavabit.com> wrote: > Johannes wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 08:21:35AM +0000, Alexander Voigt wrote: >> > Dear Dillo developers, >> > >> > since you started porting Dillo to FLTK 1.3, I wonder if you plan to >> > do a last release of the current FLTK 2.0 Dillo? (This would seem >> > reasonable to me, since this version works pretty well and some of us >> > can't wait so long for the next release. :) >> >> Sounds like a good idea. > > *agrees* > > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)dillo.org > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev >

Jan. 25, 2011

Final release of FLTK 2.0 Dillo

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Johannes wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 08:21:35AM +0000, Alexander Voigt wrote: > > Dear Dillo developers, > > > > since you started porting Dillo to FLTK 1.3, I wonder if you plan to > > do a last release of the current FLTK 2.0 Dillo? (This would seem > > reasonable to me, since this version works pretty well and some of us > > can't wait so long for the next release. :) > > Sounds like a good idea. *agrees*

Jan. 25, 2011

Jump to page: