- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Final release of FLTK 2.0 Dillo

by corvid＠lavabit.com

What do we need to fix before we could have a release?

Jan. 25, 2011

Final release of FLTK 2.0 Dillo

by obeythepenguin＠gmail.com

*thinks switching toolkits every couple years was never a good idea to begin with* On 1/25/11, corvid <corvid(a)lavabit.com> wrote: > Johannes wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 08:21:35AM +0000, Alexander Voigt wrote: >> > Dear Dillo developers, >> > >> > since you started porting Dillo to FLTK 1.3, I wonder if you plan to >> > do a last release of the current FLTK 2.0 Dillo? (This would seem >> > reasonable to me, since this version works pretty well and some of us >> > can't wait so long for the next release. :) >> >> Sounds like a good idea. > > *agrees* > > > _______________________________________________ > Dillo-dev mailing list > Dillo-dev(a)dillo.org > http://lists.auriga.wearlab.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dillo-dev >

Jan. 25, 2011

Final release of FLTK 2.0 Dillo

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Johannes wrote: > On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 08:21:35AM +0000, Alexander Voigt wrote: > > Dear Dillo developers, > > > > since you started porting Dillo to FLTK 1.3, I wonder if you plan to > > do a last release of the current FLTK 2.0 Dillo? (This would seem > > reasonable to me, since this version works pretty well and some of us > > can't wait so long for the next release. :) > > Sounds like a good idea. *agrees*

Jan. 25, 2011

Final release of FLTK 2.0 Dillo

by johannes.hofmann＠gmx.de

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 08:21:35AM +0000, Alexander Voigt wrote: > Dear Dillo developers, > > since you started porting Dillo to FLTK 1.3, I wonder if you plan to > do a last release of the current FLTK 2.0 Dillo? (This would seem > reasonable to me, since this version works pretty well and some of us > can't wait so long for the next release. :) Sounds like a good idea. Cheers, Johannes

Jan. 25, 2011

Final release of FLTK 2.0 Dillo

by Hole.destructor＠gmx.de

Dear Dillo developers, since you started porting Dillo to FLTK 1.3, I wonder if you plan to do a last release of the current FLTK 2.0 Dillo? (This would seem reasonable to me, since this version works pretty well and some of us can't wait so long for the next release. :) Many thanks in advance, Alexander Voigt

Jan. 25, 2011

1.3 port status

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Roger wrote: > Capi_filters_test: DENY from 'news.google.com' to 'nt3.ggpht.com' If you want all of those, in dillorc, change filter_auto_requests to allow_all.

Jan. 25, 2011

1.3 port status

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Roger wrote: > I was just using hg update (after the initial hg clone $url). hg update is something different. You use hg pull to get changes from a repository. > Here's my description now, pages load, even news.google.com loads! Scrolling > on news.google.com pauses/lags at times. No images loaded on news.google.com. Right now, the scrolling doesn't happen while the cursor wanders outside of the scrollbar bounds. > As for the dillo interface, tabs appear after a few seconds/minutes of mouse > wandering. I do have buttons, but the "File, View, ..." buttons are still > hidden. After mouse wandering? Of their own accord? View?

Jan. 25, 2011

1.3 port status

by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com

> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:39:37PM +0000, corvid wrote: >Roger wrote: >> Yup. I performed the 'hg tip' and compared with your times and mine still >> showed older. This is exactly what I was afraid of. svn/cvs update seems so >> much friendlier! >> >> So, I just wiped and re-cloned. > >Had you been using 'hg pull http://hg.dillo.org/dillo_port1.3'? > >I'll take a look at this pthread/lock matter... > >UI brokenness: Is the patch applying cleanly for you? >I'll send you a screenshot of what I see with and without the patch. >It should look rather like ordinary dillo but unpolished. I was just using hg update (after the initial hg clone $url). Totally scratch the buggy GUI description I gave! I forgot to apply 1.3_ui_hardcoded.patch from this thread! Here's my description now, pages load, even news.google.com loads! Scrolling on news.google.com pauses/lags at times. No images loaded on news.google.com. As for the dillo interface, tabs appear after a few seconds/minutes of mouse wandering. I do have buttons, but the "File, View, ..." buttons are still hidden. Images do load for "http://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?zoneid=AKZ222" and www.google.com. But negative images for news.google.com ... no biggy as I only really read text. I'll try the pthread patch next.

Jan. 24, 2011

1.3 port status

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Roger wrote: > Here's that pthread issue again: > g++ -I/usr/include/libpng14 -I/usr/include/fltk-1.1 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE > -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -g -O2 -Wall -W > -Wno-unused-parameter -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -L/usr/local/lib -o dillo > dillo.o paths.o ui.o uicmd.o bw.o cookies.o auth.o colors.o misc.o history.o > prefs.o prefsparser.o keys.o url.o bitvec.o klist.o chain.o utf8.o timeout.o > dialog.o web.o nav.o cache.o decode.o dicache.o capi.o css.o cssparser.o > styleengine.o plain.o html.o form.o table.o bookmark.o dns.o gif.o jpeg.o png.o > imgbuf.o image.o menu.o dpiapi.o findbar.o xembed.o ../dlib/libDlib.a > ../dpip/libDpip.a IO/libDiof.a ../dw/libDw-widgets.a ../dw/libDw-fltk.a > ../dw/libDw-core.a ../lout/liblout.a -ljpeg -L/usr/lib -lpng14 > -L/usr/lib/fltk-1.1 -Wl,-rpath,/usr/lib/fltk-1.1 -lfltk -lXext -lXft > -lfontconfig -ldl -lm -lX11 -lz > dns.o: In function `Dns_server_req': > /home/roger/src/dillo/dillo_port1.3/src/dns.c:360: undefined reference to > `pthread_create' Does the attached fix this for you?

Jan. 24, 2011

1.3 port status

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Roger wrote: > Yup. I performed the 'hg tip' and compared with your times and mine still > showed older. This is exactly what I was afraid of. svn/cvs update seems so > much friendlier! > > So, I just wiped and re-cloned. Had you been using 'hg pull http://hg.dillo.org/dillo_port1.3'? I'll take a look at this pthread/lock matter... UI brokenness: Is the patch applying cleanly for you? I'll send you a screenshot of what I see with and without the patch. It should look rather like ordinary dillo but unpolished.

Jan. 24, 2011