- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Downloading a file twice

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 10:20:54AM +0200, Alexander Voigt wrote: > Hi Dillo developers. > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 09:49:10PM +0200, Alexander Voigt wrote: > > Thanks, the current repo fixes the bug for me! > > I just noticed that this bug is also present in the current release > candidate dillo-2.2.1-rc1. I would recommend to fix this bug also in > the upcomming release, if possible. There were several other bugfixes and improvements that were not backported to the dillo-2.x branch. We could think we lack a maintainer for the 2.x branch, but that's not the case as the branch is officially deprecated, and we want to focus all the manpower in dillo3. Thanks for the catch anyway. -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 26, 2011

multiple search engines

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 09:35:41PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > What if it was like: > > > Search [Fl_Choice] > > [Fl_Input] > > [Fl_Button] [Fl_Button] Yes, I thought of it, and also about just a down arrow, but receeded. 1.- Down arrow . . Search: [ ][v] [Fl_Button] [Fl_Button] . . It is less visible (and not obvious) and may be expected to bring past search strings. 2.- . . Search: [Fl_Choice]: [ ] [Fl_Button] [Fl_Button] . . It brings attention first to [Fl_Choice], and in most cases, it's better to focus it first on the text input (and when the user wants a secondary search engine he knows beforehand he'll be changing it). It breaks just hitting tabkey to change search engine quickly. -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 26, 2011

release preparations (was Re: [Dillo-dev] Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?)

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 07:54:34PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > [...] > No more reports have come my way. > A couple more days and it'll become a release. OK, the dillo-2.2.1 release is done. The freshmeat announcement was also submitted (now waiting for verification). I'm happy because now we can concentrate on dillo3 and its upcoming release! :-) -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 26, 2011

multiple search engines

by corvid＠lavabit.com

What if it was like: Search [Fl_Choice] [Fl_Input] [Fl_Button] [Fl_Button]

July 24, 2011

release preparations (was Re: [Dillo-dev] Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?)

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > OK, rc1 for dillo-2.2.1 is here: > > http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-2.2.1-rc1.tar.bz2 > > Please download, build, test and report how it works in your OS. Looks good here! Linux 3.0.0, gcc 4.4.1, fltk-2.0.x-r7513. Regards, Jeremy Henty

July 24, 2011

multiple search engines

by jcid＠dillo.org

Hi there, Just committed a patch that allows having multiple search engines in dillorc. Available from the web search dialog. They feel quite handy. Please try, enjoy, and comment ;-). -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 24, 2011

Downloading a file twice

by Hole.destructor＠gmx.de

Hi Dillo developers. On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 09:49:10PM +0200, Alexander Voigt wrote: > Thanks, the current repo fixes the bug for me! I just noticed that this bug is also present in the current release candidate dillo-2.2.1-rc1. I would recommend to fix this bug also in the upcomming release, if possible. Kind regards, Alexander

July 23, 2011

release preparations (was Re: [Dillo-dev] Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?)

by Hole.destructor＠gmx.de

Hi, I just tried Dillo 2.2.1-rc1 on Scientific Linux 6.0 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.x86_64 gcc 4.4.4 20100726 (Red Hat 4.4.4-13) FLTK 2.0.x r7513 and it works very well. Kind regards, Alexander

July 23, 2011

release preparations (was Re: [Dillo-dev] Benchmark for web page rendering speed; dillo-svn vs dillo 2.2?)

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:52:20PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 03:01:36PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 07:57:18PM +0200, Alexander Voigt wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > > OK, rc1 for dillo-2.2.1 is here: > > > > > > > > http://www.dillo.org/download/dillo-2.2.1-rc1.tar.bz2 > > > > > > > > Please download, build, test and report how it works in your OS. > > > > > > Dillo 2.2.1 rc1 compiles and runs smoothly on my machine: > > > > > > Debian 6.0 GNU/Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 > > > gcc (Debian 4.4.5-8) 4.4.5 > > > FLTK 2.0.x r7513 > > > > Thanks for the report. > > Now, let's expect some more... > > Compiles and runs fine on: > > DragonFly 2.11-DEVELOPMENT > gcc (DragonFly) 4.4.6 No more reports have come my way. A couple more days and it'll become a release. -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 23, 2011

Nav_save_cb() after bw closed

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Saw this in Jeremy's valgrind log. There's a a_UIcmd_set_msg(Web->bw, "File saved (%d Bytes)", st.st_size); that works not so well when the bw is gone. I know there's a /* TODO: keep track of this client */ in a_Nav_save_url... Should this be associated with a bw in this way?

July 22, 2011