- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

experimental patch: allow alt text to wrap

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 09:39:32PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Just tried this, and I like the results quite a bit. After some testing, it looks like a worthy addition. Sites w/o images become more "readable" with it. BTW, using SHADING_DARK for drawSimpleWrappedText() helps too. > - "simple" insofar as it doesn't bother with the letter-spacing and > font-variant code. > > - it's a separate path from drawText() because this many-argument version > of fl_draw() in fl_draw.cxx is rather a long function so that it can > deal with wrapping and images and symbols and all kinds of alignment in > general. > > - if the wrapped text fits into the box, we do some unnecessary clipping. > Would it be worth the trouble to add an interface to get fl_measure() > information? It doesn't look worth the effort. If you see no further problems, please commit. -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 28, 2011

Which FLTK2 version for dillo-2.1.1 ^W dillo-2.2.1?

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 07:04:47PM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > > > corvid wrote: > > > > > In README, it has "The recommended version is >= r6916. and <=r7513". > > > > Then we have a problem as the FLTK site's download area doesn't have > > tarballs for any releases < r8323. Perhaps dillo.org could host a > > recommended version? > > Just noticed the subject of this thread says "dillo-2.1.1", > instead of "dillo-2.2.1". D'oh! A typo on my part. > dillo-2.2.1's README, does exactly what you suggest. So it does! I have updated the BLFS wiki pages[1][2]. Has the list of installed files changed between versions 2.2 and 2.2.1? Looking forward to creating a BLFS wiki page for Dillo 3! Regards, Jeremy "First person to run Dillo under Linux 3" Henty [1] http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/wiki/dillo2 [2] http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/wiki/fltk2

July 28, 2011

are we officially at feature freeze yet?

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 06:00:18PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Jorge wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 07:48:18PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > - UI_TEMPORARILY_SHOW_PANELS > > > Not exactly important: > > > - the panel problems when resizing from very small. > > > > and > > > > - alt text wrapping (which looks like a nice feature) > > > > - remove large panel > > - The findbar input doesn't know about Ctrl-A, etc. BTW, does anybody have a working URL for BUG#868? (I had a different one as test case, but it went nil...). -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 27, 2011

are we officially at feature freeze yet?

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 06:00:18PM +0000, corvid wrote: > Jorge wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 07:48:18PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > - UI_TEMPORARILY_SHOW_PANELS > > > Not exactly important: > > > - the panel problems when resizing from very small. > > > > and > > > > - alt text wrapping (which looks like a nice feature) > > > > - remove large panel > > - The findbar input doesn't know about Ctrl-A, etc. Done. -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 27, 2011

Which FLTK2 version for dillo-2.1.1?

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 07:04:47PM +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote: > > corvid wrote: > > > In README, it has "The recommended version is >= r6916. and <=r7513". > > Then we have a problem as the FLTK site's download area doesn't have > tarballs for any releases < r8323. Perhaps dillo.org could host a > recommended version? Just noticed the subject of this thread says "dillo-2.1.1", instead of "dillo-2.2.1". dillo-2.2.1's README, does exactly what you suggest. -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 27, 2011

Which FLTK2 version for dillo-2.1.1?

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

corvid wrote: > In README, it has "The recommended version is >= r6916. and <=r7513". Then we have a problem as the FLTK site's download area doesn't have tarballs for any releases < r8323. Perhaps dillo.org could host a recommended version? Regards, Jeremy Henty

July 27, 2011

are we officially at feature freeze yet?

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jorge wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 07:48:18PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > - UI_TEMPORARILY_SHOW_PANELS > > Not exactly important: > > - the panel problems when resizing from very small. > > and > > - alt text wrapping (which looks like a nice feature) > > - remove large panel - The findbar input doesn't know about Ctrl-A, etc.

July 27, 2011

are we officially at feature freeze yet?

by obeythepenguin＠gmail.com

On Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:54:45 -0400, corvid <corvid(a)lavabit.com> wrote: > Benjamin wrote: >> I'd say just reintroduce the close button alongside click-to-close. > > I would say that a nice patch that does this -- or, better yet, puts > one on each tab -- would be accepted with a smile. I'll try to take a look if I have time (I haven't updated my local copy to dillo-3.0 yet). ~Benjamin

July 27, 2011

are we officially at feature freeze yet?

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:53:55PM -0400, Benjamin Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Jorge Arellano Cid <jcid(a)dillo.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 11:23:49PM +0000, corvid wrote: > >> > >> Do you think the tabs should have a tooltip indicating that they > >> can be closed with a click? Somehow it's hard for me to remember > >> that that feature exists. > > > > ?Yeah, it's probably a good idea. > > ?(something like the clear URL button). > > I'd say just reintroduce the close button alongside click-to-close. > That way you're not changing a familiar, intuitive user interface > users would expect from other applications, but you've still got a > useful shortcut for more advanced users. AFAIS, this idea looks like the best trade off so far. Although I'd hoped a tooltip label to be enough hint, the single close button to the right is more obvious, and it can bear a tooltip that lists the other ways to close a tab. The tooltip is effective because almost everything in the panel has one, so at some point the user will explore them. As for one close button per tab label, I'd prefer not to. > [...] > Dillo's way is quite convenient once you get used to it, but > it's harder for new users because it breaks with other > applications' conventions. -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 27, 2011

Which FLTK2 version for dillo-2.1.1?

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Jeremy wrote: > > I want to update the BLFS pages for Dillo-2.2.1 so I need to know > which version(s) of FLTK2 to recommend. I remember there was a recent > discussion but I can't find it in the list archives (strangely, > searches for "fltk2" and "fltk version" turn up next to nothing - is > search working?). In README, it has "The recommended version is >= r6916. and <=r7513". I'd noticed earlier that search was misbehaving, which was strange because it's been working well for a long time now...

July 27, 2011