- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Dillo ported to DOS

by mailbox＠georgpotthast.de

I have tested the port with MSDOS 7.0 and in a Windows XP DOS box. I am sure it will also work with FreeDOS. I uploaded the screenshot as a file to my google code site and made a link to that. Therefore the browsers start to download it. Georg Potthast

Nov. 14, 2011

Dillo ported to DOS

by rogerx.oss＠gmail.com

> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 06:02:32PM +0100, Georg Potthast wrote: >I can announce that the Dillo browser has been ported to DOS now. You can >download the first beta here: > >http://nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos.googlecode.com/files/DilloDos-… > >I recently ported the FLTK toolkit to DOS. Based on that I could port the >Dillo GUI to DOS. Benjamin Johnson, who ported Dillo to Windows joined me >and so this beta is available now based on Dillo for Windows. DOS also has a >problem with dpi, therefore the port is based on Dillo-Win32. Yea FreeDOS? -- Roger http://rogerx.freeshell.org/

Nov. 14, 2011

Dillo ported to DOS

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

Georg Potthast wrote: > I can announce that the Dillo browser has been ported to DOS now. > [...] > Here is a screenshot: > http://nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos.googlecode.com/files/Dillo_for… Wow! At this rate Microsoft will be our main platform soon! ;-) Joking apart, that is impressive. Regards, Jeremy Henty PS: there seems be a MIME problem or something with that URL. Both Dillo and Firefox insist on downloading it rather than displaying it. They both display the downloaded file with no problem.

Nov. 14, 2011

Dillo ported to DOS

by mailbox＠georgpotthast.de

I can announce that the Dillo browser has been ported to DOS now. You can download the first beta here: http://nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos.googlecode.com/files/DilloDos-… I recently ported the FLTK toolkit to DOS. Based on that I could port the Dillo GUI to DOS. Benjamin Johnson, who ported Dillo to Windows joined me and so this beta is available now based on Dillo for Windows. DOS also has a problem with dpi, therefore the port is based on Dillo-Win32. Here is a screenshot: http://nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos.googlecode.com/files/Dillo_for… Georg Potthast

Nov. 14, 2011

text alignment and list item markers

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 01:21:10AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Any objection to removing the special case for putting list item markers > at the far left even when the text is centered or whatever? > I've never liked this weird special case, and I see that Firefox doesn't > do it, anyway. +1 -- Cheers Jorge.-

Nov. 13, 2011

text alignment and list item markers

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

corvid wrote: > Any objection to removing the special case for putting list item > markers at the far left even when the text is centered or whatever? > I've never liked this weird special case, and I see that Firefox > doesn't do it, anyway. +1. It looks much nicer the Firefox way. Regards, Jeremy Henty

Nov. 13, 2011

text alignment and list item markers

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 01:21:10AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Any objection to removing the special case for putting list item markers > at the far left even when the text is centered or whatever? > I've never liked this weird special case, and I see that Firefox doesn't > do it, anyway. > diff -r 284f9065236f dw/textblock.cc > --- a/dw/textblock.cc Sat Nov 12 20:35:34 2011 +0000 > +++ b/dw/textblock.cc Sun Nov 13 01:16:11 2011 +0000 > @@ -1079,15 +1079,7 @@ > if (leftOffset < 0) > leftOffset = 0; > > - if (hasListitemValue && lastLine == lines->getRef (0)) { > - /* List item markers are always on the left. */ > - lastLine->leftOffset = 0; > - words->getRef(0)->effSpace = words->getRef(0)->origSpace + leftOffset; > - //DBG_OBJ_ARRSET_NUM (this, "words.%d.effSpace", 0, > - // words->getRef(0)->effSpace); > - } else { > - lastLine->leftOffset = leftOffset; > - } > + lastLine->leftOffset = leftOffset; > } > mustQueueResize = true; > +1 Cheers, Johannes

Nov. 13, 2011

text alignment and list item markers

by corvid＠lavabit.com

Any objection to removing the special case for putting list item markers at the far left even when the text is centered or whatever? I've never liked this weird special case, and I see that Firefox doesn't do it, anyway.

Nov. 13, 2011

tests that should not be case-sensitive

by corvid＠lavabit.com

I wrote: > - a bunch of cases where we test url strings with the scheme > included. This seems to work all right for me, anyway. As for whether it really makes sense to test for dpi scheme in some of the DPIs, or whether I should care about URL_AUTHORITY anywhere, I'm not certain...

Nov. 11, 2011

is* character classification

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 05:14:23AM +0000, corvid wrote: > > I was just looking at how the is* functions treat characters with the > high bit set. If I set LC_CTYPE to en_US, 0xC0 is alpha, but it > understandably isn't in en_US.UTF-8. > > So I found my way to > /usr/share/i18n/locales/ en_US -> en_GB -> i18n > > And found that: > upper 41-5A, C0-D6, D8-DE > lower 61-7A, B5, DF-F6, F8-FF > alpha 41-5A, 61-7A, AA, B5, BA, C0-D6, D8-F6, F8-FF > digit 30-39 > space 09-0D, 20 > cntrl 00-1F, 7F-9F > punct 21-2F, 3A-40, 5B-60, 7B-7E, A0-A9, AB-B4, B6-B9, BB-BF, D7, F7 > graph 21-7E, A0-FF > print 20-7E, A0-FF > xdigit 30-39, 41-46, 61-66 > blank 9, 20 > > In dillo: > isupper not used > islower not used > isalpha cssparser, html > isdigit doesn't matter > isalnum cssparser, html, datauri, downloads, dlib.h > dIsalnum url > isspace cssparser, html, keys, dlib.h, findtext.hh > dIsspace colors, src/cookies, misc, dpi/cookies, file, ftp, dlib > iscntrl keys, auth, misc > ispunct textblock > isgraph not used > isprint dlib > isxdigit doesn't matter > isblank not used > isascii not used > > I'm not sure that any real harm is done in these cases, but it might not > be a bad idea to check that it's ascii when we only want ascii. Sure. I could imagine you already regret that you started looking into this stuff :)

Nov. 10, 2011