- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Search from address bar

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 09:21:51AM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:02:12PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > Hi Johannes, > > > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:51:39PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:20:27PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:41:23PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > > Johannes wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 03:16:09PM +0300, Aki Helin wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently when using a window manager where focus follows mouse, making a > > > > > > > search usually requires you to reach for the mouse. One way to avoid this > > > > > > > would be to allow using search engine(s) directly from the address bar. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Searches would have to be differentiated somehow from URLs. Dillo already > > > > > > > has a customizable list of engines in preferences, so one natural solution > > > > > > > would be to interpret url strings which start with the name of a search > > > > > > > engine as searches to be performed using it, so that e.g. 'wikipedia > > > > > > > slartibartfast', 'google foo' and 'weather oulu' do what you would expect. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Below is a quick patch I've used to do this for a while, should anyone > > > > > > > else find this feature useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > This has been discussed before, but somehow wasn't completed. I like > > > > > > your idea to reuse the search engine name to derive the shortcut. > > > > > > However, I would allow arbitrary prefixes of the search engine name > > > > > > as in the slightly modified patch below. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > This is good, although there's a leading space in the search text that > > > > > some of my search sites don't like. > > > > > > > > The leading space should of course not be part of the search term. > > > > > > If nobody objects I will commit this tomorrow. > > > > The current format for search_url in a_Misc_parse_search_url() is: > > > > "[<label> ]<url>" > > > > IMHO, it'd be much better to have it this way in the patch: > > > > "[<label[:abbr]> ]<url>" > > > > where "abbr" means abbreviation. e.g. > > > > search_url="Free Dictionary:fd http://www.thefreedictionary.com/%s" > > > > that way I could search "slick" from the location box like this: > > > > fd slick > > > > and keep the descriptive names for the GUI interface. > > The idea of the proposed patch is to allow arbitrary prefixes of the > descriptive names as shortcuts, so > > goo dillo > duck dillo > > but also > > g dillo > d dillo > > would work without further configuration work. In case there is more > than one match, the first wins. Does this make sense or should do you prefer explicit configurable shortcuts? Cheers, Johannes

July 18, 2013

Search from address bar

by johannes.hofmann＠gmx.de

On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 05:02:12PM -0400, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > Hi Johannes, > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:51:39PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:20:27PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:41:23PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > > Johannes wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 03:16:09PM +0300, Aki Helin wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Currently when using a window manager where focus follows mouse, making a > > > > > > search usually requires you to reach for the mouse. One way to avoid this > > > > > > would be to allow using search engine(s) directly from the address bar. > > > > > > > > > > > > Searches would have to be differentiated somehow from URLs. Dillo already > > > > > > has a customizable list of engines in preferences, so one natural solution > > > > > > would be to interpret url strings which start with the name of a search > > > > > > engine as searches to be performed using it, so that e.g. 'wikipedia > > > > > > slartibartfast', 'google foo' and 'weather oulu' do what you would expect. > > > > > > > > > > > > Below is a quick patch I've used to do this for a while, should anyone > > > > > > else find this feature useful. > > > > > > > > > > This has been discussed before, but somehow wasn't completed. I like > > > > > your idea to reuse the search engine name to derive the shortcut. > > > > > However, I would allow arbitrary prefixes of the search engine name > > > > > as in the slightly modified patch below. > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > This is good, although there's a leading space in the search text that > > > > some of my search sites don't like. > > > > > > The leading space should of course not be part of the search term. > > > > If nobody objects I will commit this tomorrow. > > The current format for search_url in a_Misc_parse_search_url() is: > > "[<label> ]<url>" > > IMHO, it'd be much better to have it this way in the patch: > > "[<label[:abbr]> ]<url>" > > where "abbr" means abbreviation. e.g. > > search_url="Free Dictionary:fd http://www.thefreedictionary.com/%s" > > that way I could search "slick" from the location box like this: > > fd slick > > and keep the descriptive names for the GUI interface. The idea of the proposed patch is to allow arbitrary prefixes of the descriptive names as shortcuts, so goo dillo duck dillo but also g dillo d dillo would work without further configuration work. In case there is more than one match, the first wins. Cheers, Johannes

July 10, 2013

Search from address bar

by jcid＠dillo.org

Hi Johannes, On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:51:39PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:20:27PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:41:23PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > > Johannes wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 03:16:09PM +0300, Aki Helin wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Currently when using a window manager where focus follows mouse, making a > > > > > search usually requires you to reach for the mouse. One way to avoid this > > > > > would be to allow using search engine(s) directly from the address bar. > > > > > > > > > > Searches would have to be differentiated somehow from URLs. Dillo already > > > > > has a customizable list of engines in preferences, so one natural solution > > > > > would be to interpret url strings which start with the name of a search > > > > > engine as searches to be performed using it, so that e.g. 'wikipedia > > > > > slartibartfast', 'google foo' and 'weather oulu' do what you would expect. > > > > > > > > > > Below is a quick patch I've used to do this for a while, should anyone > > > > > else find this feature useful. > > > > > > > > This has been discussed before, but somehow wasn't completed. I like > > > > your idea to reuse the search engine name to derive the shortcut. > > > > However, I would allow arbitrary prefixes of the search engine name > > > > as in the slightly modified patch below. > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > This is good, although there's a leading space in the search text that > > > some of my search sites don't like. > > > > The leading space should of course not be part of the search term. > > If nobody objects I will commit this tomorrow. The current format for search_url in a_Misc_parse_search_url() is: "[<label> ]<url>" IMHO, it'd be much better to have it this way in the patch: "[<label[:abbr]> ]<url>" where "abbr" means abbreviation. e.g. search_url="Free Dictionary:fd http://www.thefreedictionary.com/%s" that way I could search "slick" from the location box like this: fd slick and keep the descriptive names for the GUI interface. -- Cheers Jorge.-

July 9, 2013

Search from address bar

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 08:20:27PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 04:41:23PM +0000, corvid wrote: > > Johannes wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 03:16:09PM +0300, Aki Helin wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Currently when using a window manager where focus follows mouse, making a > > > > search usually requires you to reach for the mouse. One way to avoid this > > > > would be to allow using search engine(s) directly from the address bar. > > > > > > > > Searches would have to be differentiated somehow from URLs. Dillo already > > > > has a customizable list of engines in preferences, so one natural solution > > > > would be to interpret url strings which start with the name of a search > > > > engine as searches to be performed using it, so that e.g. 'wikipedia > > > > slartibartfast', 'google foo' and 'weather oulu' do what you would expect. > > > > > > > > Below is a quick patch I've used to do this for a while, should anyone > > > > else find this feature useful. > > > > > > This has been discussed before, but somehow wasn't completed. I like > > > your idea to reuse the search engine name to derive the shortcut. > > > However, I would allow arbitrary prefixes of the search engine name > > > as in the slightly modified patch below. > > > What do you think? > > > > This is good, although there's a leading space in the search text that > > some of my search sites don't like. > > The leading space should of course not be part of the search term. If nobody objects I will commit this tomorrow. Johannes

July 9, 2013

line wrapping

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On Sa, Jun 29, 2013, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:08:13PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > On Do, Jun 27, 2013, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:20:23PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > > > On Mi, Jun 26, 2013, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:17:41PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > > > > > On Mi, Jun 19, 2013, corvid wrote: > > > > > > > I noticed that lines aren't wrapping for me with > > > > > > > http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html . > > > > > > > hg bisect says that it started with: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > changeset: 2838:b2b239eb45b9 > > > > > > > summary: Fixed problem with hyphenation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Fixed. I didn't fully understand the problem, but the latest change > > > > > > makes sense and solves the problem. > > > > > > > > > > After updating to hg tip, the problem persists for me... > > > > > > > > With revision 2861:686f563e96d4? How does it look like? (Perhaps send > > > > a screenshot, or scp it to dillo.org.) > > > > > > > > How does the attached page look like? What experiences do other users > > > > make? > > > > > > The only difference I noticed compared to firefox is that dillo > > > doesn't seem to line-break stuff in the inner boxes (e.g. > > > "body {background-color: purple}") > > > I can't really say whether it should though. > > > > What do you mean with "inner boxes"? BTW, I do not see any difference > > between Firefox (Iceweasel 10.0.12) and dillo revision 2861. > > > > What about <http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html>? > > I meant the "inner boxes" on http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html. E.g the > one containing "body {background-color: purple}". > > That one doesn't line break for me in dillo, but does so in firefox. > But I don't know whether this is the thing Jorge was talking about > in his initial post. As far as I see, this is because the maximal width of these "inner boxes" is larger than the minimal width of the "outer box", which is defined by a wider "pre" section. The differences should depend on fonts etc. Anyway, Jorge has confirmed that his problem has been fixed by my latest change. I hope that also some other glitches (which can be seen but are hard to define precisely) have gone. Sebastian

July 2, 2013

line wrapping

by jcid＠dillo.org

On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 06:30:09PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:08:13PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > On Do, Jun 27, 2013, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:20:23PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > > > On Mi, Jun 26, 2013, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:17:41PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > > > > > On Mi, Jun 19, 2013, corvid wrote: > > > > > > > I noticed that lines aren't wrapping for me with > > > > > > > http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html . > > > > > > > hg bisect says that it started with: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > changeset: 2838:b2b239eb45b9 > > > > > > > summary: Fixed problem with hyphenation. > > > > > > > > > > > > Fixed. I didn't fully understand the problem, but the latest change > > > > > > makes sense and solves the problem. > > > > > > > > > > After updating to hg tip, the problem persists for me... > > > > > > > > With revision 2861:686f563e96d4? How does it look like? (Perhaps send > > > > a screenshot, or scp it to dillo.org.) > > > > > > > > How does the attached page look like? What experiences do other users > > > > make? > > > > > > The only difference I noticed compared to firefox is that dillo > > > doesn't seem to line-break stuff in the inner boxes (e.g. > > > "body {background-color: purple}") > > > I can't really say whether it should though. > > > > What do you mean with "inner boxes"? BTW, I do not see any difference > > between Firefox (Iceweasel 10.0.12) and dillo revision 2861. > > > > What about <http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html>? > > I meant the "inner boxes" on http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html. E.g the > one containing "body {background-color: purple}". > > That one doesn't line break for me in dillo, but does so in firefox. > But I don't know whether this is the thing Jorge was talking about > in his initial post. FYI, I managed to reduce the test page to under 1KB, sent it to Sebastian along with some debug info, and two interesting facts that pinpoint much better what's going on. For instance, I had: pre {white-space: pre-wrap} in my .dillo/style.css, commenting it avoids the bug. There's also a DIV element in the test page with lang=en, setting lang to "de", but keeping my style.css, also avoids the bug. Setting lang to "es" also shows the bug. -- Cheers Jorge.-

June 29, 2013

line wrapping

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 05:08:13PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > On Do, Jun 27, 2013, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:20:23PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > > On Mi, Jun 26, 2013, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:17:41PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > > > > On Mi, Jun 19, 2013, corvid wrote: > > > > > > I noticed that lines aren't wrapping for me with > > > > > > http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html . > > > > > > hg bisect says that it started with: > > > > > > > > > > > > changeset: 2838:b2b239eb45b9 > > > > > > summary: Fixed problem with hyphenation. > > > > > > > > > > Fixed. I didn't fully understand the problem, but the latest change > > > > > makes sense and solves the problem. > > > > > > > > After updating to hg tip, the problem persists for me... > > > > > > With revision 2861:686f563e96d4? How does it look like? (Perhaps send > > > a screenshot, or scp it to dillo.org.) > > > > > > How does the attached page look like? What experiences do other users > > > make? > > > > The only difference I noticed compared to firefox is that dillo > > doesn't seem to line-break stuff in the inner boxes (e.g. > > "body {background-color: purple}") > > I can't really say whether it should though. > > What do you mean with "inner boxes"? BTW, I do not see any difference > between Firefox (Iceweasel 10.0.12) and dillo revision 2861. > > What about <http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html>? I meant the "inner boxes" on http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html. E.g the one containing "body {background-color: purple}". That one doesn't line break for me in dillo, but does so in firefox. But I don't know whether this is the thing Jorge was talking about in his initial post. Johannes

June 29, 2013

line wrapping

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On Do, Jun 27, 2013, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:20:23PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > On Mi, Jun 26, 2013, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:17:41PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > > > On Mi, Jun 19, 2013, corvid wrote: > > > > > I noticed that lines aren't wrapping for me with > > > > > http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html . > > > > > hg bisect says that it started with: > > > > > > > > > > changeset: 2838:b2b239eb45b9 > > > > > summary: Fixed problem with hyphenation. > > > > > > > > Fixed. I didn't fully understand the problem, but the latest change > > > > makes sense and solves the problem. > > > > > > After updating to hg tip, the problem persists for me... > > > > With revision 2861:686f563e96d4? How does it look like? (Perhaps send > > a screenshot, or scp it to dillo.org.) > > > > How does the attached page look like? What experiences do other users > > make? > > The only difference I noticed compared to firefox is that dillo > doesn't seem to line-break stuff in the inner boxes (e.g. > "body {background-color: purple}") > I can't really say whether it should though. What do you mean with "inner boxes"? BTW, I do not see any difference between Firefox (Iceweasel 10.0.12) and dillo revision 2861. What about <http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html>? Sebastian

June 28, 2013

line wrapping

by Johannes.Hofmann＠gmx.de

On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 07:20:23PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > On Mi, Jun 26, 2013, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:17:41PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > > On Mi, Jun 19, 2013, corvid wrote: > > > > I noticed that lines aren't wrapping for me with > > > > http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html . > > > > hg bisect says that it started with: > > > > > > > > changeset: 2838:b2b239eb45b9 > > > > summary: Fixed problem with hyphenation. > > > > > > Fixed. I didn't fully understand the problem, but the latest change > > > makes sense and solves the problem. > > > > After updating to hg tip, the problem persists for me... > > With revision 2861:686f563e96d4? How does it look like? (Perhaps send > a screenshot, or scp it to dillo.org.) > > How does the attached page look like? What experiences do other users > make? The only difference I noticed compared to firefox is that dillo doesn't seem to line-break stuff in the inner boxes (e.g. "body {background-color: purple}") I can't really say whether it should though. Johannes

June 27, 2013

line wrapping

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On Mi, Jun 26, 2013, Jorge Arellano Cid wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:17:41PM +0200, Sebastian Geerken wrote: > > On Mi, Jun 19, 2013, corvid wrote: > > > I noticed that lines aren't wrapping for me with > > > http://www.dillo.org/FAQ.html . > > > hg bisect says that it started with: > > > > > > changeset: 2838:b2b239eb45b9 > > > summary: Fixed problem with hyphenation. > > > > Fixed. I didn't fully understand the problem, but the latest change > > makes sense and solves the problem. > > After updating to hg tip, the problem persists for me... With revision 2861:686f563e96d4? How does it look like? (Perhaps send a screenshot, or scp it to dillo.org.) How does the attached page look like? What experiences do other users make? Sebastian

June 27, 2013