- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Alternative styles support?

by eocene＠gmx.com

Sebastian wrote: > Iceweasel (Firefox): > View -> Page Style -> (No Style | Fresh, Revolution) Only now do I find that it's possible to get the menu bar back. I believe mine disappeared when firefox decided to move everything into that stupid three-horizontal-bars icon because they're trend-followers, and anyway I thought that was just the new terrible way of things to not have access to anything anymore.

May 24, 2015

Alternative styles support?

by johnfound＠asm32.info

On Sun, 24 May 2015 19:26:17 +0000 eocene <eocene at gmx.com> wrote: > > How do other browsers inform the user that alternative stylesheets are > available? > In firefox, all styles can be switched from "View|Page Style" menu. Also, there is a plugin that displays the available styles in the status bar, allows fast switching and can remember the preferred style for the particular web sites. -- http://fresh.flatassembler.net http://asm32.info John Found <johnfound at asm32.info>

May 24, 2015

Alternative styles support?

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

On So, Mai 24, 2015, eocene wrote: > John wrote: > > On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:39:14 +0000 > > eocene <eocene at gmx.com> wrote: > > > > > John wrote: > > > > Are there plans about supporting alternative page styles? > > > > > > > > I mean, those defined by <link rel="alternate stylesheet" />. > > > > > > I'd sort of idly considered it. How is the existence of these > > > alternatives presented in other browsers? How common are > > > alternative stylesheets on the contemporary web? > > > > This is feature, supported by all major browsers. I don't know about the > > whole www, but I have a site, that uses such approach: > > > > http://fresh.flatassembler.net > > > > The supplementary style (named Revolution) was made because of user > > request - he/she wanted to use more screen area and without hidden > > menus. > > How do other browsers inform the user that alternative stylesheets are > available? Iceweasel (Firefox): View -> Page Style -> (No Style | Fresh, Revolution) Haven't yet found out how it works with Chromium. In dillo, it should be rather simple to integrate the styles into the tools menu. Perhaps some configuration per site would be nice, too. Sebastian

May 24, 2015

Alternative styles support?

by eocene＠gmx.com

John wrote: > On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:39:14 +0000 > eocene <eocene at gmx.com> wrote: > > > John wrote: > > > Are there plans about supporting alternative page styles? > > > > > > I mean, those defined by <link rel="alternate stylesheet" />. > > > > I'd sort of idly considered it. How is the existence of these > > alternatives presented in other browsers? How common are > > alternative stylesheets on the contemporary web? > > This is feature, supported by all major browsers. I don't know about the > whole www, but I have a site, that uses such approach: > > http://fresh.flatassembler.net > > The supplementary style (named Revolution) was made because of user > request - he/she wanted to use more screen area and without hidden > menus. How do other browsers inform the user that alternative stylesheets are available?

May 24, 2015

Alternative styles support?

by johnfound＠asm32.info

On Sun, 24 May 2015 15:39:14 +0000 eocene <eocene at gmx.com> wrote: > John wrote: > > Are there plans about supporting alternative page styles? > > > > I mean, those defined by <link rel="alternate stylesheet" />. > > I'd sort of idly considered it. How is the existence of these > alternatives presented in other browsers? How common are > alternative stylesheets on the contemporary web? This is feature, supported by all major browsers. I don't know about the whole www, but I have a site, that uses such approach: http://fresh.flatassembler.net The supplementary style (named Revolution) was made because of user request - he/she wanted to use more screen area and without hidden menus. -- http://fresh.flatassembler.net http://asm32.info John Found <johnfound at asm32.info>

May 24, 2015

Documentation in the tarball?

by eocene＠gmx.com

Sebastian wrote: > Keeping it out of the tarball would have advantages: > > - It makes the tarball smaller. > > - We developers would not have to think that much about file sizes of > the documentation: these files do not go into the tarball; and for > those using the lastest version from the Hg repository, it should be > reasonable to spend some more disc space. > > What do you think? *agrees*

May 24, 2015

Alternative styles support?

by eocene＠gmx.com

John wrote: > Are there plans about supporting alternative page styles? > > I mean, those defined by <link rel="alternate stylesheet" />. I'd sort of idly considered it. How is the existence of these alternatives presented in other browsers? How common are alternative stylesheets on the contemporary web?

May 24, 2015

Documentation in the tarball?

by sgeerken＠dillo.org

Hi! Does it make sense to include all developer documentation into the tarball? As an alternative, only user documentation, plus a notice where to find the developer docs, could be included, while the rest can only be found in the repository at hg.dillo.org. I assume that someone who is interested in the internals of dillo will anyway refer to the lastest version from the Hg repository. Keeping it out of the tarball would have advantages: - It makes the tarball smaller. - We developers would not have to think that much about file sizes of the documentation: these files do not go into the tarball; and for those using the lastest version from the Hg repository, it should be reasonable to spend some more disc space. What do you think? Sebastian

May 24, 2015

Alternative styles support?

by johnfound＠asm32.info

Hi, Dillo team. Are there plans about supporting alternative page styles? I mean, those defined by <link rel="alternate stylesheet" />. This should be really easy to be implemented. In addition, if there is defined style with name="Dillo", it can be switched by default and this way to provide better support for Dillo from the web masters. Of course this behaviour can be made optional. Best Regards. -- http://fresh.flatassembler.net http://asm32.info John Found <johnfound at asm32.info>

May 24, 2015

valgrind

by onepoint＠starurchin.org

eocene wrote: > Jeremy wrote: > > [...] > > Something has broken my hg access. I just noticed that my hg update > > job has been failing for a while, but I haven't made any changes to it > > ages. > > > > $ hg incoming > > abort: error: [SSL: CERTIFICATE_VERIFY_FAILED] certificate verify failed (_ssl.c:581) > > > > Can anyone help? > > I see that I get the same thing if I have cacerts in .hgrc. My .hgrc does not mention cacerts. All it does is set my name and enable the mq and graphlog extensions. > (It would seem that I normally use hostfingerprints instead. It's > been long enough that I don't remember whether I had any good reason > for that...) Maybe I should use host fingerprints too. How do you set that up? Regards, Jeremy Henty

May 23, 2015