- Dillo-dev - lists.mailman3.com

Baby steps for patch submission?

by Voland0 De Caribilla

Greetings with wishes of health and peace. I've been programming for a long time, but have never contributed to a project. My programming has been building mouse driver and graphics acceleration libraries using X86 assembly for DOS programs, serial communications (simple terminal emulator) using Mix PowerC atop DOS, file-manipulation utilities using Sun cc, and Perl/CGI with DBI. I've now made to small edits necessary to correct the links on the about:splash, and need to know the best way to create and submit a patch. I made the edits in a copy of the source for 0.6.6 that I obtained through Debian. Is the best diff to diff -pru <mySrcDir> <origSrcDir>, or just to diff the edited file with the original file? Do I email the patch, or check it in to the CVS server? -- _______________________________________________ Get your free email from http://mymail.operamail.com Powered by Outblaze

Jan. 20, 2003

[PATCH] Limit size of Cache

by Livio Baldini Soares

Hello everyone! A long, long time ago I sent in a patch for limiting the size of the Cache in Dillo. Here is a very precise description of what I had done: http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=1642897 I have been using this patch for daily use for the past 6 months. I haven't experienced a single crash. So I think it is high time I rediffed my patch for current CVS. The patch can be found here: http://www.ime.usp.br/~livio/dillo/patches/cache-size-limit.20020119.diff The diffstat output: dillorc | 15 ++++++-- src/IO/about.c | 10 +++-- src/browser.h | 3 + src/cache.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- src/cache.h | 2 - src/interface.c | 4 +- src/prefs.c | 5 ++ src/prefs.h | 2 + 8 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) There are some changes from this version to the previous. First, I have removed the about:cache-clean functionality. I have had private discussions with some users and we've concluded it was not a very good idea. The about:cache functionality is still there, though. I think it's nice. Oh, and I had to "undo" the changes with respect to num_bw and browser_window variables in browser.h and interface.c; they are now global again. This could be easily changed if wanted - just make a helper function in interface.c which returns a copy of browser_window. Jorge, please consider applying this patch. Any problems, don't hesitate to e-mail. best wishes, -- Livio <livio(a)ime.usp.br>

Jan. 19, 2003

copy from page

by slymer＠slymer.org

When will dillo enable it's user to copy from the pages it renders ? I read somewhere on the dillo site that this has been fixed, but latest cvs build doesn't seem to be enable me to copy text. -- People tend to make rules for others and exceptions for themselves. Registered Linux user #298569

Jan. 19, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] hi

by Sebastian Geerken

On Sat, Jan 18, Andr?s Mujica - Linux SEAQ wrote: > i want to share with all of u this article.. sorry if it was already > reported... > > > http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/695/ Was already reported, and has been added to the press page. > by the way, dillo is a great, great browser.. is the one i use all time.. Thanks. Sebastian

Jan. 18, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Web pages - compatibility

by Sebastian Geerken

On Thu, Jan 09, Andreas Schweitzer wrote: > Since I'm not quite sure who is maintainig the web pages > I send it here : > The Compatibility page should list the BSD's as follows > >  > > <LI> NetBSD (in pkgsrc) > <li> FreeBSD (in the ports) > <li> OpenBSD (in the ports) > >  > > I.e. OpenBSD certainly is not restricted to Version 2.9. Also > the phrases in the parantheses mean something to BSD users :-) > (essentially that dillo is part of the OS in a broader sense). > > Also, for the handhelds : NetBSD has binaries for the > StrongARM and the MIPS based handhelds on their ftp sites. Done. I also added a section in the "Packages" section, on the "Download" page. Sebastian

Jan. 18, 2003

hi

by Andrés Mujica - Linux SEAQ

i want to share with all of u this article.. sorry if it was already reported... http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/695/ by the way, dillo is a great, great browser.. is the one i use all time..

Jan. 18, 2003

Re: Dillo-dev -- confirmation of subscription -- request 535129

by Pierre Maon

On Sat, 18 Jan 2003 13:41:33 +0100 dillo-dev-request(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de wrote: > Dillo-dev -- confirmation of subscription -- request 535129 > > We have received a request from 80.200.16.25 for subscription of your > email address, <pierre.maon(a)skynet.be>, to the > dillo-dev(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de mailing list. To confirm the > request, please send a message to > dillo-dev-request(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de, and either: > > - maintain the subject line as is (the reply's additional "Re:" is > ok), > > - or include the following line - and only the following line - in the > message body: > > confirm 535129 > > (Simply sending a 'reply' to this message should work from most email > interfaces, since that usually leaves the subject line in the right > form.) > > If you do not wish to subscribe to this list, please simply disregard > this message. Send questions to > dillo-dev-admin(a)lists.auriga.wearlab.de. >

Jan. 18, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] Freshmeat article

by Sebastian Geerken

Hi Livio, On Sat, Jan 18, Livio Baldini Soares wrote: > Dillo has a section on an article about Lightweight Browsers: > http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/695/ > > Maybe someone could add this to the "Dillo In The Press!" section. Done. I don't know how Jorge sorts them, I assume that it is done by relevance. Sebastian

Jan. 18, 2003

Freshmeat article

by Livio Baldini Soares

Hi all, Dillo has a section on an article about Lightweight Browsers: http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/695/ Maybe someone could add this to the "Dillo In The Press!" section. best regards, -- Livio <livio(a)ime.usp.br>

Jan. 18, 2003

Re: [Dillo-dev] cvs not compiling ?

by Nicola Girardi

Sebastian Geerken wrote: > configure should probably not be part of the CVS. Along with other files, as I suggested some time ago, but nobody replied. :-(

Jan. 18, 2003